| Literature DB >> 34072270 |
Tamás Pivarcsik1,2, Gábor Tóth1, Nikoletta Szemerédi3, Anita Bogdanov3, Gabriella Spengler1,3, Jakob Kljun4, Jerneja Kladnik4, Iztok Turel4, Éva A Enyedy1,2.
Abstract
In this work, the various biological activities of eight organoruthenium(II) complexes were evaluated to reveal correlations with their stability and reactivity in aqueous media. Complexes with general formula [Entities:
Keywords: MRSA; MTT assay; UV-vis; albumin binding; ligand effect; solution stability
Year: 2021 PMID: 34072270 PMCID: PMC8226722 DOI: 10.3390/ph14060518
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8247
Figure 1ABCB1 modulating activity on multidrug-resistant Colo 320 colonic adenocarcinoma cells in the presence of complexes 1–8, RAPTA-C at 2 μM (stripped bars) and 20 μM (full bars) concentrations. Verapamil (Verap.) was used as a positive control at 20 μM.
Scheme 1Structures of the studied [Ru(η6-p-cymene)(X,Y)(Z)] complexes 1–8.
IC50 values of the complexes determined on chemo-sensitive (Colo 205), multidrug resistant (Colo 320) human colonic adenocarcinoma cell lines and normal human embryonal lung fibroblast cells (MRC-5) (72 h), in addition to selectivity indexes (S.I., ratio of the indicated IC50 values).
| IC50 (μM) | S.I. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colo 205 | Colo 320 | MRC-5 | MRC-5/Colo 205 | MRC-5/Colo 320 | |
|
| 14.04 ± 0.62 | 3.3 ± 1.3 | 2.17 ± 0.22 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
|
| >100 | >100 | >100 | – | – |
|
| 17.3 ± 3.1 | 10.7 ±1.5 | 7.6 ± 1.6 | 0.44 | 0.71 |
|
| >100 | >100 | 81.0 ± 6.2 | <0.81 | <0.81 |
|
| 21.0 ± 2.4 | 13.74 ± 0.85 | 2.95 ± 0.71 | 0.14 | 0.21 |
|
| >100 | >100 | >100 | – | – |
|
| 52.4 ± 2.7 | 29.1 ± 2.0 | 26.5 ± 3.2 | 0.51 | 0.91 |
|
| 80.6 ± 1.1 | 47.8 ± 7.3 | 17.6 ± 1.5 | 0.22 | 0.37 |
| RAPTA-C | >100 | >100 | >100 | – | – |
| cisplatin | 29.8 ± 1.2 | 5.58 ± 0.70 | 0.88 ± 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.16 |
Antibacterial activity of the complexes on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains. MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration.
| MIC (μM) |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
|
| 50 | 100 | >100 | >100 |
|
| >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 |
|
| 12.5 | 12.5 | >100 | >100 |
|
| >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 |
|
| 25 | 12.5 | >100 | >100 |
|
| 100 | >100 | >100 | >100 |
|
| 50 | 50 | >100 | >100 |
|
| 50 | 100 | >100 | >100 |
| RAPTA-C | >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 |
| cisplatin | >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 |
1 MRA ATCC 43300. 2 ATCC 29212. 3 AG100. 4 ATCC 49619.
Figure 2Antibacterial effect of complexes 7 and 8 against Chlamydia trachomatis.
Figure 3Antiviral effect of complexes 1–4 and 7–8 against herpes simplex virus-2.
Figure 41H-NMR spectra of 6 at pH 7.4 (PBS’) in the low field region recorded for the fresh sample, after 24 h and 48 h waiting time. {T = 25.0 °C, ccomplex = 0.5 mM; 10% (v/v) DMSO-d6}.
pKa values of ligands HPYR and HHiQT and chlorido complexes 1 and 3 in pure water in the presence of 200 mM chloride ions. {T = 25.0 °C, I = 0.2 M KCl}.
| Compound | p | Method |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| H | 4.52 ± 0.04 1 | pH-potentiometry | 1.3 mM |
| H | 4.63 ± 0.08 | UV-vis | 27 μM |
|
| 10.37 ± 0.06 | pH-potentiometry | 1.30 mM |
| 10.34 ± 0.03 | UV-vis | 250 μM | |
|
| 10.29 ± 0.09 | pH-potentiometry 2 | 0.6 mM |
| 10.25 ± 0.03 | UV-vis | 250 μM |
1 pKa = 4.49 (I = 0.20 M KCl) [40]. 2 Complex 3 has much better water solubility than its ligand HiQT.
Figure 5UV-vis absorption spectra recorded for complex 1 in the presence of 200 mM chloride ions at various pH values (solid lines), in addition to the summed spectra of the unbound ligand pyrithione and [Ru(η6-p-cymene)(H2O)3]2+ at pH 2 (dashed line) using the same concentration of the complex, ligand and metal precursor in the samples. Inserted figure shows the absorbance values of complex 1 at 360 nm plotted against the pH. {T = 25.0 °C, I = 0.2 M KCl, ccomplex = 250 μM; l = 1 cm}.
Log D7.4 (n-octanol/water) and effective passive permeability values (Peff) of complexes 1–3 at pH = 7.4. {T = 25.0 °C, 20 mM phosphate buffer}.
| c(KCl) | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| log | 4 mM | −0.43 ± 0.09 | n.d. | +0.92 ± 0.06 |
| log | 24 mM | −0.10 ± 0.05 | n.d. | +1.22 ± 0.04 |
| log | 100 mM | +0.31 ± 0.03 | n.d. | +1.37 ± 0.06 |
| 100 mM | 1.13 × 10−6 | 2.88 × 10−6 | 3.35 × 10−6 | |
| recovery | 1.3% | 15% | 8.1% |
Figure 6Time-dependence of UV-vis absorption spectra recorded for (a) complex 1 and (b) complex 2 in the presence of 0.5 equiv. HSA at pH = 7.4. {T = 25.0 °C, ccomplex = 100 μM, pH = 7.40 PBS’ buffer; l = 1 cm}.
Figure 7UV-vis absorption spectra recorded for (a,d) complex 1, (b,e) complex 3 and (c,f) complex 4 in the presence of various equivalents of HSA or mim, respectively at pH = 7.4. The numbers indicate the range of the cHSA/ccomplex or cmim/ccomplex ratios. In case of PTA complexes 24 h incubation time was used. {T = 25.0 °C, pH = 7.40 PBS’ buffer, ccomplex = 210 μM, cHSA= 6.3–71.4 μM or cmim = 29–210 μM (a,b,d,e); ccomplex = 116 μM, cHSA= 6.3–71.4 μM or cmim = 29–1160 μM with 8% (v/v) DMSO (c,f); l = 1 cm}.
Figure 8(a) Fluorescence emission spectra obtained for HSA titrated by complex 1 using λEX = 295 nm. (b) Intensity changes (%) at 330 nm at the various HSA-to-complex ratios for complex 1 (■), complex 2 (×), complex 3 (●) complex 4 (∆; ▲ (batch samples using 48 h equilibration time)). {T = 25.0 °C, pH = 7.40 PBS’ buffer, cHSA= 1 μM}.
Conditional binding constants of the compounds at binding sites I and II of HSA determined by spectrofluorometric Trp-214 quenching (logKQ’) and site marker (WF or DG) displacement (logKWF’ and logKDG’) measurements. {pH = 7.40 PBS’ buffer; T = 25 °C}.
| log | log | log | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 5.81 ± 0.03 |
| 6.16 ± 0.03 | 5.80 ± 0.03 |
|
| <4 |
| – | – |
|
| 6.18 ± 0.03 |
| 5.98 ± 0.03 | 5.61 ± 0.03 |
|
| 4.46 ± 0.03 | – | – |