Literature DB >> 34071085

Lack of Relationship between Fibrosis-Related Biomarkers and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance-Assessed Replacement and Interstitial Fibrosis in Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

Paweł Rubiś1, Ewa Dziewięcka1, Magdalena Szymańska2, Robert Banyś3, Małgorzata Urbańczyk-Zawadzka3, Maciej Krupiński3, Małgorzata Mielnik3, Sylwia Wiśniowska-Śmiałek1, Aleksandra Karabinowska1, Piotr Podolec1, Mateusz Winiarczyk4, Matylda Gliniak4, Monika Kaciczak4, Jan Robak4, Arman Karapetyan4, Ewa Wypasek2,5.   

Abstract

The relationship between circulating fibrosis-related molecules and magnetic resonance-assessed cardiac fibrosis in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is poorly understood. To compare circulating biomarkers between DCM patients with high and low fibrosis burdens, we performed a prospective, single-center, observational study. The study population was composed of 100 DCM patients (87 male, mean age 45.2 ± 11.8 years, mean ejection fraction 29.7% ± 10.1%). Replacement fibrosis was quantified by means of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), whereas interstitial fibrosis was assessed via extracellular volume (ECV). Plasma concentrations of cardiotrophin-1, growth differentiation factor-15, platelet-derived growth factor, procollagen I C-terminal propeptide, procollagen III N-terminal propeptide, and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen were measured. There were 44% patients with LGE and the median ECV was 27.7%. None of analyzed fibrosis serum biomarkers were associated with the LGE or ECV, whereas NT-proBNP was independently associated with both LGE and ECV, and troponin T was associated with ECV. None of the circulating fibrosis markers differentiated between DCM patients with and without replacement fibrosis, or patients stratified according to median ECV. However, cardiac-specific markers, such as NT-proBNP and hs-TnT, were associated with fibrosis. Levels of circulating markers of fibrosis seem to have no utility in the diagnosis and monitoring of cardiac fibrosis in DCM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; collagen; dilated cardiomyopathy; interstitial fibrosis; replacement fibrosis

Year:  2021        PMID: 34071085     DOI: 10.3390/cells10061295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cells        ISSN: 2073-4409            Impact factor:   6.600


  46 in total

1.  Soluble ST2 and myocardial fibrosis in 3T cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Silvio Quick; Nadine K Waessnig; Nadine Kandler; David M Poitz; Steffen Schoen; Karim Ibrahim; Ruth H Strasser; Uwe Speiser
Journal:  Scand Cardiovasc J       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.589

Review 2.  Dynamic changes in myocardial matrix and relevance to disease: translational perspectives.

Authors:  Ai-Hsien Li; Peter P Liu; Francisco J Villarreal; Ricardo A Garcia
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  Biventricular mechanics in prediction of severe myocardial fibrosis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: CMR study.

Authors:  Łukasz Mazurkiewicz; Joanna Petryka; Mateusz Spiewak; Barbara Miłosz-Wieczorek; Konrad Werys; Łukasz A Małek; Magdalena Polanska-Skrzypczyk; Natalia Ojrzynska; Agata Kubik; Magdalena Marczak; Jolanta Misko; Jacek Grzybowski
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 4.  Left ventricular remodeling in heart failure: current concepts in clinical significance and assessment.

Authors:  Marvin A Konstam; Daniel G Kramer; Ayan R Patel; Martin S Maron; James E Udelson
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-01

5.  Serum Matrix Metalloproteinases as Quantitative Biomarkers for Myocardial Fibrosis and Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Stratification in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Julia Münch; Maxim Avanesov; Peter Bannas; Dennis Säring; Elisabeth Krämer; Giulia Mearini; Lucie Carrier; Anna Suling; Gunnar Lund; Monica Patten
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 5.712

6.  Usefulness of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and brain natriuretic peptide as biomarkers of myocardial fibrosis in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Tatsuya Kawasaki; Chieko Sakai; Kuniyasu Harimoto; Michiyo Yamano; Shigeyuki Miki; Tadaaki Kamitani
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Classification of the cardiomyopathies: a position statement from the European Society Of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases.

Authors:  Perry Elliott; Bert Andersson; Eloisa Arbustini; Zofia Bilinska; Franco Cecchi; Philippe Charron; Olivier Dubourg; Uwe Kühl; Bernhard Maisch; William J McKenna; Lorenzo Monserrat; Sabine Pankuweit; Claudio Rapezzi; Petar Seferovic; Luigi Tavazzi; Andre Keren
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 8.  The Diagnosis and Evaluation of Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Alan G Japp; Ankur Gulati; Stuart A Cook; Martin R Cowie; Sanjay K Prasad
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Cardiac magnetic resonance-derived fibrosis, strain and molecular biomarkers of fibrosis in hypertensive heart disease.

Authors:  Gernot Pichler; Josep Redon; Fernando Martínez; Elena Solaz; Oscar Calaforra; Marta San Andrés; Begoña Lopez; Javier Díez; Rainer Oberbauer; Christopher Adlbrecht; Georg Delle Karth; Alicia Maceira
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.844

10.  Soluble St2 Induces Cardiac Fibroblast Activation and Collagen Synthesis via Neuropilin-1.

Authors:  Lara Matilla; Vanessa Arrieta; Eva Jover; Amaia Garcia-Peña; Ernesto Martinez-Martinez; Rafael Sadaba; Virginia Alvarez; Adela Navarro; Amaya Fernandez-Celis; Alicia Gainza; Enrique Santamaria; Joaquín Fernandez-Irigoyen; Patrick Rossignol; Faiez Zannad; Natalia Lopez-Andres
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 6.600

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Detection of myocardial fibrosis: Where we stand.

Authors:  Leyi Zhu; Yining Wang; Shihua Zhao; Minjie Lu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.