Maria Gabriela O Fernandes1,2,3, Natália Cruz-Martins2,4,5, Conceição Souto Moura6, Susana Guimarães2,6, Joana Pereira Reis3,4, Ana Justino3,4, Maria João Pina3,4, Adriana Magalhães1, Henrique Queiroga1, José Carlos Machado2,3,4, Venceslau Hespanhol1,2,3,4, José Luis Costa2,3,4. 1. Pulmonology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Alameda Prof. Hernani Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal. 2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernani Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal. 3. Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal. 4. Institute for Research and Innovation in Health (i3S), University of Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal. 5. Laboratory of Neuropsychophysiology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal. 6. Pathology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Alameda Prof. Hernani Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has remarkable potential as a non-invasive lung cancer molecular diagnostic method. This prospective study addressed the clinical value of a targeted-gene amplicon-based plasma next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay to detect actionable mutations in ctDNA in patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung adenocarcinoma. METHODS: ctDNA test performance and concordance with tissue NGS were determined, and the correlation between ctDNA findings, clinical features, and clinical outcomes was evaluated in 115 patients with paired plasma and tissue samples. RESULTS: Targeted-gene NGS-based ctDNA and NGS-based tissue analysis detected 54 and 63 genomic alterations, respectively; 11 patients presented co-mutations, totalizing 66 hotspot mutations detected, 51 on both tissue and plasma, 12 exclusively on tissue, and 3 exclusively on plasma. NGS-based ctDNA revealed a diagnostic performance with 81.0% sensitivity, 95.3% specificity, 94.4% PPV, 83.6% NPV, test accuracy of 88.2%, and Cohen's Kappa 0.764. PFS and OS assessed by both assays did not significantly differ. Detection of ctDNA alterations was statistically associated with metastatic disease (p = 0.013), extra-thoracic metastasis (p = 0.004) and the number of organs involved (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the potential use of ctDNA for mutation detection in newly diagnosed NSCLC patients due to its high accuracy and correlation with clinical outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has remarkable potential as a non-invasive lung cancer molecular diagnostic method. This prospective study addressed the clinical value of a targeted-gene amplicon-based plasma next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay to detect actionable mutations in ctDNA in patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung adenocarcinoma. METHODS: ctDNA test performance and concordance with tissue NGS were determined, and the correlation between ctDNA findings, clinical features, and clinical outcomes was evaluated in 115 patients with paired plasma and tissue samples. RESULTS: Targeted-gene NGS-based ctDNA and NGS-based tissue analysis detected 54 and 63 genomic alterations, respectively; 11 patients presented co-mutations, totalizing 66 hotspot mutations detected, 51 on both tissue and plasma, 12 exclusively on tissue, and 3 exclusively on plasma. NGS-based ctDNA revealed a diagnostic performance with 81.0% sensitivity, 95.3% specificity, 94.4% PPV, 83.6% NPV, test accuracy of 88.2%, and Cohen's Kappa 0.764. PFS and OS assessed by both assays did not significantly differ. Detection of ctDNA alterations was statistically associated with metastatic disease (p = 0.013), extra-thoracic metastasis (p = 0.004) and the number of organs involved (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the potential use of ctDNA for mutation detection in newly diagnosed NSCLCpatients due to its high accuracy and correlation with clinical outcomes.
Entities:
Keywords:
cell-free DNA (cfDNA); circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA); genotyping; liquid biopsy; lung adenocarcinoma; next generation sequencing (NGS)
Authors: Adrian G Sacher; Cloud Paweletz; Suzanne E Dahlberg; Ryan S Alden; Allison O'Connell; Nora Feeney; Stacy L Mach; Pasi A Jänne; Geoffrey R Oxnard Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: D Planchard; S Popat; K Kerr; S Novello; E F Smit; C Faivre-Finn; T S Mok; M Reck; P E Van Schil; M D Hellmann; S Peters Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Mark G Kris; Bruce E Johnson; Lynne D Berry; David J Kwiatkowski; A John Iafrate; Ignacio I Wistuba; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Wilbur A Franklin; Samuel L Aronson; Pei-Fang Su; Yu Shyr; D Ross Camidge; Lecia V Sequist; Bonnie S Glisson; Fadlo R Khuri; Edward B Garon; William Pao; Charles Rudin; Joan Schiller; Eric B Haura; Mark Socinski; Keisuke Shirai; Heidi Chen; Giuseppe Giaccone; Marc Ladanyi; Kelly Kugler; John D Minna; Paul A Bunn Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-05-21 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Neal I Lindeman; Philip T Cagle; Dara L Aisner; Maria E Arcila; Mary Beth Beasley; Eric H Bernicker; Carol Colasacco; Sanja Dacic; Fred R Hirsch; Keith Kerr; David J Kwiatkowski; Marc Ladanyi; Jan A Nowak; Lynette Sholl; Robyn Temple-Smolkin; Benjamin Solomon; Lesley H Souter; Erik Thunnissen; Ming S Tsao; Christina B Ventura; Murry W Wynes; Yasushi Yatabe Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2018-01-22 Impact factor: 5.534
Authors: J Remon; C Caramella; C Jovelet; L Lacroix; A Lawson; S Smalley; K Howarth; D Gale; E Green; V Plagnol; N Rosenfeld; D Planchard; M V Bluthgen; A Gazzah; C Pannet; C Nicotra; E Auclin; J C Soria; B Besse Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Bastiaan B J Tops; Nicola Normanno; Henriette Kurth; Eliana Amato; Andrea Mafficini; Nora Rieber; Delphine Le Corre; Anna Maria Rachiglio; Anne Reiman; Orla Sheils; Christoph Noppen; Ludovic Lacroix; Ian A Cree; Aldo Scarpa; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Pierre Laurent-Puig Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2015-01-31 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Clare M McCourt; Darragh G McArt; Ken Mills; Mark A Catherwood; Perry Maxwell; David J Waugh; Peter Hamilton; Joe M O'Sullivan; Manuel Salto-Tellez Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-07-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Maria Gabriela O Fernandes; Natália Cruz-Martins; José Carlos Machado; José Luís Costa; Venceslau Hespanhol Journal: Cancer Cell Int Date: 2021-12-16 Impact factor: 5.722