Literature DB >> 34070253

Comparison of Fissure Sealant Chair Time and Patients' Preference Using Three Different Isolation Techniques.

Rahif E Mattar1, Ayman M Sulimany1, Saad S Binsaleh1, Ibrahim M Al-Majed1.   

Abstract

This randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the patient's preference and chair time needed during pit and fissure sealant placement under three isolation techniques (Isolite system, rubber dam isolation, and cotton roll isolation). Participants, aged 6-15 years and requiring four sealants on the first or second permanent molars, attending the pediatric dental clinics at King Saud University in Saudi Arabia were enrolled according to the inclusion criteria. Each participant received sealants on three random first or second permanent molars using three isolation techniques. The time required for sealant placement was recorded for each technique. Following sealant placement, an interview-based questionnaire was administered to the participants to evaluate their preference regarding the isolation techniques. Forty-eight children (23 male and 25 female) with a mean age of 8.58 ± 1.93 years participated in this study. The mean chair times were 248.14, 255.89, and 243.29 s for the Isolite system, rubber dam isolation, and cotton roll isolation, respectively. Approximately 79% of participants considered cotton roll isolation to be the most comfortable, whereas approximately 71% were significantly less likely to use rubber dam isolation again. In conclusion, there were no significant differences in sealant placement time among the three isolation techniques. However, cotton roll isolation was the technique that was most preferred by the participants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Isolite; children; fissure sealants; isolation; patient preference; permanent molars; randomized clinical trial; time

Year:  2021        PMID: 34070253     DOI: 10.3390/children8060444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Children (Basel)        ISSN: 2227-9067


  19 in total

1.  The effect of etch-time on the bond strength of a sealant and on the etch-pattern in primary and permanent enamel: an evaluation.

Authors:  S Tandon; R Kumari; S Udupa
Journal:  ASDC J Dent Child       Date:  1989 May-Jun

2.  A systematic review of population-based dental caries studies among children in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Dania Ebrahim Al Agili
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2012-11-10

3.  [Sanford Christie Barnum--inventor of the rubber dam].

Authors:  R Winkler
Journal:  Quintessenz       Date:  1991-03

4.  The American Dental Association Caries Classification System for clinical practice: a report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs.

Authors:  Douglas A Young; Brian B Nový; Gregory G Zeller; Robert Hale; Thomas C Hart; Edmond L Truelove
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.634

5.  A study of the Isolite system during sealant placement: efficacy and patient acceptance.

Authors:  James Collette; Stephen Wilson; David Sullivan
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.874

6.  Three-year evaluation of sealant: effect of isolation on efficacy.

Authors:  L H Straffon; J B Dennison; F G More
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.634

7.  Strong evidence for the effectiveness of resin based sealants.

Authors:  Chris Deery
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2013-09

8.  Dental caries: experience in relation to wasting and stunted growth among schoolboys in Abha, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  M A Abolfotouh; K H Hassan; M S Khattab; R M Youssef; A Sadek; M El-Sebaiei
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2000 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 1.526

9.  Attitudes of final year dental students to the use of rubber dam.

Authors:  S Mala; C D Lynch; F M Burke; P M H Dummer
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 5.264

10.  Prevalence of dental caries and associated social risk factors among preschool children in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Laila A Al-Meedani; Yousef H Al-Dlaigan
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.