| Literature DB >> 34070197 |
Anna Zawada1, Iwona Przerada1, Małgorzata Lubas1, Maciej Sitarz2, Magdalena Leśniak2.
Abstract
This paper uses mathematical methods as the basic tool at the stage of experiment planning. The importance of research programming applications was shown using the theory of experiments and the STATISTICA software. The method of experiment planning used in the case of studying the properties of a mixture, depending on its composition, features considerable complexity. The aim of the statistical analysis was to determine the influence of variable chemical composition of waste materials on selected properties of glass-ceramic materials. A statistical approach to multicomponent systems, such as ceramic sets, enables the selection of appropriate amounts of raw materials through the application of 'a plan for mixtures'. To utilize the raw waste materials, e.g., slags from a solid waste incinerator, fly or bottom ashes, in the modeling of new materials, a mathematical relationship was developed, which enables estimating, based on the waste chemical composition, selected technological and practical properties of the glass so as to obtain a material featuring the required technological-practical parameters. For the obtained glasses, a comparative analysis of the experimentally and computationally determined properties was carried out: transformation temperature, liquidus temperature, density, and thermal expansion coefficient. The obtained high theoretical approximation (at the level of determination correlation coefficient R2 > 0.8) confirms the suitability of the polynomial model for mixtures for applications in the design of new glass-ceramic products.Entities:
Keywords: experiment planning; glass-ceramic materials; statistical modeling; waste management
Year: 2021 PMID: 34070197 PMCID: PMC8158504 DOI: 10.3390/ma14102651
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Number of experimental points for 3 and 4 components (k). N—number of experimental points; g—the degree of the regression polynomial [18].
Number of coefficients b of a regression polynomial in relation to the degree of the polynomial and the number of components [18].
| Number of | Regression Polynomial | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2nd Degree | 3rd Degree | 4th Degree | |
| Number of Coefficients b | |||
| 3 | 6 | 10 | 15 |
| 4 | 10 | 20 | 35 |
| 5 | 15 | 35 | 70 |
| 6 | 21 | 56 | 126 |
| 7 | 28 | 84 | 210 |
Figure 2Changes in properties of aluminosilicate glasses related to their chemical composition (RO: CaO + MgO).
Oxides content ranges (in wt%).
|
| SiO2 | Al2O3 | CaO | MgO | Fe2O3 | R2O * |
|
| 45–60 | 8–20 | 10–25 | 3–15 | 2–10 | 4–6 |
* R—alkalimetals (Na, K).
Examples of oxide compositions of glasses melted according to the research plan (wt%).
| Nr | SiO2 | Al2O3 | CaO | MgO | Fe2O3 | Alkali |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 46 | 21 | 23 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| 2 | 44 | 13 | 21 | 8 | 9 | 4 |
| 3 | 59 | 9 | 10 | 13 | 2 | 5 |
| 4 | 46 | 10 | 22 | 14 | 2 | 5 |
| 5 | 60 | 19 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| 6 | 45 | 21 | 23 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 7 | 58 | 14 | 19 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 8 | 45 | 23 | 18 | 3 | 6 | 4 |
| 9 | 46 | 19 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 5 |
| 10 | 43 | 21 | 18 | 3 | 10 | 4 |
| 11 | 44 | 8 | 21 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| 12 | 46 | 9 | 19 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 13 | 45 | 9 | 19 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| 11 | 43 | 8 | 21 | 4 | 3 | 6 |
| 12 | 44 | 9 | 19 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| 13 | 45 | 8 | 19 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| 14 | 54 | 8 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 15 | 46 | 9 | 17 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 16 | 49 | 8 | 18 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
| 17 | 48 | 8 | 18 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 18 | 48 | 8 | 18 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 19 | 48 | 8 | 19 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 20 | 47 | 8 | 18 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 14 | 50 | 8 | 18 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 15 | 46 | 9 | 20 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| 16 | 47 | 9 | 20 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| 21 | 47 | 9 | 20 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| 22 | 47 | 8 | 19 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| 23 | 48 | 8 | 19 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 24 | 46 | 8 | 19 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 25 | 51 | 8 | 18 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| 26 | 51 | 8 | 18 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| 27 | 48 | 8 | 20 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| 28 | 45 | 8 | 19 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
Figure 3Measurement of Tg using dilatometry.
Figure 4Comparison of the measured values (experimentally tested) with the estimated values (calculated using the chosen mathematical model)—for a dependent variable: transformation temperature (Tg) in °C.
Figure 5Comparison of the measured values (experimentally tested) and the estimated values (calculated using the chosen mathematical model)—for a dependent variable: thermal expansion coefficient α, in 10−6/K.
Figure 6Comparison of the measured values (experimentally tested) and the estimated values (calculated using the chosen mathematical model)—for a dependent variable: liquidus temperature in °C.
Figure 7Comparison of the measured values (experimentally tested) and the estimated values (calculated using the chosen mathematical model)—for a dependent variable: density in g/cm3.