| Literature DB >> 34069616 |
Valeria Farriol-Baroni1, Lorena González-García1, Aina Luque-García1, Silvia Postigo-Zegarra1, Sergio Pérez-Ruiz1.
Abstract
Scientific interest in the positive aspects of aging and the development of healthy aging has increased, given the need to ensure older people well-being and quality of life. In this sense, social support and some sociodemographic variables may have a not yet entirely clear role. The main objective of this work was to analyze the predictive relationships of age, marital status, social support and subjective well-being on the general perception of the health of a group of elderly people. The participants were 137 people (77.4% women) between 61 and 91 years old (M = 73.11; SD = 6.22); 56.9% of them had a partner and 40.1% did not. The path analysis tested indicates that social support has an indirect predictive value on perceived overall health through its influence on subjective well-being. Age and life satisfaction are the most important direct predictors of perceived overall health. Conclusions highlight the need to delve into the study of explanatory factors of the general perception of the health of the elderly and promote interventions to facilitate the development of an appropriate social support network and increase the subjective well-being of this group.Entities:
Keywords: elder people; perceived overall health; social support; subjective well-being
Year: 2021 PMID: 34069616 PMCID: PMC8161148 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18105438
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Descriptive statistics of the variables used in the study.
|
| Range |
|
| Cronbach’s Alpha | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social support | 137 | 1–5 | 3.93 | 0.74 | 0.82 |
| Confidential | 137 | 1–5 | 3.78 | 0.82 | 0.78 |
| Affective | 137 | 1–5 | 4.20 | 0.79 | 0.70 |
| Life satisfaction | 137 | 1–7 | 4.99 | 1.27 | 0.81 |
| Self-esteem | 137 | 1–5 | 3.14 | 0.50 | 0.71 |
| Perceived general health | 137 | 1–100 | 67.04 | 18.94 | - |
Correlations between the study variables.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age | - | |||||||
|
Marital status | 0.35 ** | - | ||||||
|
Social support | 0.23 ** | −0.17 | - | |||||
|
SS confidential | 0.19 * | −0.16 | 0.95 ** | - | ||||
|
SS affective | 0.26 ** | −0.16 | 0.83 ** | 0.62 ** | - | |||
|
Life satisfaction | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.34 ** | 0.34 ** | 0.24 ** | - | ||
|
Self-esteem | −0.08 | 0.12 | 0.21 * | 0.23 ** | 0.11 | 0.19 * | - | |
|
General health | −0.23 ** | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.12 | −0.01 | 0.22 * | 0.19 * | - |
Note: Marital status was coded in two categories: 1 = without a partner (single, widowed) and 2 = with a partner or married. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.001.
Figure 1Path analysis to explain perceived general health. Note: Errors are not displayed to improve the visibility of the model. The estimates of the parameters (standardized beta coefficient for regression analyzes, indicated with one-way arrows; and Pearson’s coefficient for correlation, indicated with a two-way arrow) that were statistically significant are indicated: * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01.