| Literature DB >> 34069314 |
Debora F Silva1, Klinsmann T Lima2, Gilmara N T Bastos2, Johnatt Allan R Oliveira3, Luís Adriano S do Nascimento1, Carlos Emmerson F Costa1, Geraldo N R Filho1, Viktor O C Concha4, Marcele F Passos1.
Abstract
Developing a biomimetic material to wound care is an emerging need for the healing process. Poly (ε-caprolactone) (PCL) is a polymer with the necessary dressing's requirements often used in medicine. Their surface, physic-chemical and biological properties can be modified by adding bioactive compounds, such as andiroba seed oil (Carapa guianensis). This Amazonian natural plant has medicinal and pharmacological properties. For this purpose, PCL polymeric films incorporated with andiroba oil were investigated. The synthesis of hybrids materials was carried out in the solvent casting method. Thermal properties were evaluated using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA/DTGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The solvent type on the surface and hydrophilicity of samples was studied using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Additionally, contact angle measurements, functional groups analysis, fluid absorption capacity, and cell viability were performed. The results demonstrated the influences of andiroba oil under the morphology and thermal properties of the polymeric matrix; the hydrophilicity of the hybrid film obtained by acetic acid was reduced by 13%; the porosity decreased as the concentration of oil increased, but its higher thermal stability. The L929 cell line's proliferation was observed in all materials, and it presented nontoxic nature. It was demonstrated the ability of PCL hybrid film as a matrix for cell growth. Then, the materials were proved potential candidates for biomedical applications.Entities:
Keywords: andiroba oil; cell viability; polycaprolactone; polymer; wound healing
Year: 2021 PMID: 34069314 PMCID: PMC8157046 DOI: 10.3390/polym13101591
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Physicochemical properties of commercial andiroba oil.
| Physicochemical Data | Units | Values * |
|---|---|---|
| Acidity level | % weight | <15.0 |
| Density | 25 °C g/mL | 0.9261 |
| Iodine index | gI2/100 g | 55–80 |
| Melting point | °C | 22 |
| Peroxide content | 10 meq O2/kg | <10.0 |
| Saponification index | mg KOH/g | 190–210 |
| Unsaponifiable matter (bioactive) | % | 3–5 |
* Data obtained by the Amazon Oil supplier.
Figure 1Schematic diagram of poly (ε-caprolactone) (PCL) film synthesis by the solvent casting technique.
Samples identification and composition.
| Sample Name | Solvent | Andiroba oil (AO) |
|---|---|---|
| PAcA-control | Acetic Acid | - |
| PAcA-1.7 | Acetic Acid | 1.7 |
| PAcA-2.7 | Acetic Acid | 2.7 |
| PAC-control | Acetone | - |
| PAC-1.7 | Acetone | 1.7 |
| PAC-2.7 | Acetone | 2.7 |
| PD-control | Dichloromethane | - |
| PD-1.7 | Dichloromethane | 1.7 |
| PD-2.7 | Dichloromethane | 2.7 |
Fatty acids composition of andiroba seed oil (Carapa guianensis) determined by gas chromatography.
| Nomenclature | Chain | Composition * (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Lauric acid | C12:0 | 0.89 ± 0.38 |
| Myristic acid | C14:0 | 0.68 ± 0.25 |
| Palmitic acid | C16:0 | 26.89 ± 0.98 |
| Palmitoleic acid | C16:1 | 0.81 ± 0.06 |
| Heptadecanoic acid | C17:0 | 0.29 ± 0.34 |
| Stearic acid | C18:0 | 8.80 ± 0.10 |
| Oleic acid | C18:1 (ω-9) | 48.67 ± 1.19 |
| Linoleic acid | C18:2 (ω-6) | 10.79 ± 0.39 |
| Linolenic acid | C18:3 (ω-3) | 0.22 ± 0.02 |
| Arachidic acid | C 20:0 | 1.30 ± 0.16 |
| Behenic acid | C22:0 | 0.25 ± 0.14 |
| Lignoceric acid | C24:0 | 0.20 ± 0.04 |
* Average values and standard derivations of the three andiroba oil (AO) samples studied.
Figure 2The optical images (OI) and microscopic (SEM) of PCL casting film at magnification 1000×, respectively: (A) PD-control OI; (B) PAC-control OI; (C) PAcA-control OI; (D) PD-control SEM; (E) PAC-control SEM; (F) PAcA-control SEM; (G) PAcA-1.7 SEM; (H) PAcA-2.7 SEM.
Water contact angle measurements (average ± standard deviation) for control and hybrid samples of PCL.
| Samples | Water Contact Angle/Degrees |
|---|---|
| PAcA-control | 80.26 ± 5.72 |
| PAcA-1.7 | 87.25 ± 6.05 |
| PAcA-2.7 | 91.39 ± 5.10 |
Figure 3Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) of andiroba oil and control and hybrids film of PCL.
Figure 4(a) TGA (b) and DrTGA analysis of andiroba oil and PCL films in acetic acid (PAcA-control, PAcA-1.7, PAcA-2.7).
TGA and DrTGA curves parameters of the PCL casting films and andiroba oil: degradation onset temperature (Tonset), maximum degradation temperature (Tdmax), weight loss (%), and the percentage of residues.
| Samples | Tonset (°C) | Tdmax (°C) | Weight Loss (%) | Residue (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1° Stage | 2° Stage | 3° Stage | 4° Stage | 1° Stage | 2° Stage | 3° Stage | 4° Stage | |||
| PAcA-control | 242.7 | - | - | - | 402.4 | - | - | - | 96.5 | 3.5 |
| PAcA-1.7 | 262.9 | - | - | - | 401.5 | - | - | - | 99.1 | 0.9 |
| PAcA-2.7 | 269.9 | - | - | - | 408.9 | - | - | - | 99.5 | 0.5 |
| AO | 150.0 | 288.1 | 404.0 | 482.0 | 249.8 | 386.0 | 413.5 | 531.3 | 99.9 | 0.1 |
Figure 5DSC (second heat) analysis of andiroba oil and PCL films in acetic acid (PAcA-control, PAcA-1.7, PAcA-2.7).
DSC curves parameters of the PCL casting films: onset melting temperature (Tm onset), peak melting temperature (Tm peak), enthalpy for melting (ΔH), and degree of crystallinity (xc%).
| Parameters | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samples | Tm Onset (°C) | Tm Peak (°C) | ΔH (J g−1) | xc (%) |
| PAcA-control | 54.40 | 56.54 | 38.93 | 28.52 |
| PAcA-1.7 | 54.23 | 57.22 | 46.70 | 34.21 |
| PAcA-2.7 | 54.15 | 58.79 | 61.31 | 44.91 |
Figure 6Cell viability of L929 cells on PAcA-control and hybrids (PAcA 1.7 and PAcA-2.7) film after 24 h in culture. p < 0.05, n = 4. The asterisk (*) indicates a significant difference between the control and treated groups.
Figure 7Evaluation of the fluid absorption capacity of PCL control polymeric films (PAcA-control) and incorporated with andiroba oil (PAcA-1.7 and PAcA-2.7) immersed for one hour in aqueous or protein solution. The data were plotted in the average format and standard error of the mean. The analysis was performed by 2-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test, with p < 0.05, n = 4. The asterisk (*) indicates a significant difference between the control and treated groups.