| Literature DB >> 34069286 |
Xuetao Lyu1,2, Liqiang Zhang3, Tong Zhang3, Ben Li2, Huan Li4, Yang Yu5.
Abstract
This paper adopts the method of steel tube wall thickness and strength reduction to simulate corrosion damage. The numerical model of the square concrete-filled steel tube long column (SCFST-LC) under eccentric compression after acid rain corrosion is established in the finite element software, ABAQUS. The reliability and accuracy of the model are verified by comparing it with published relevant experimental results. The failure mode, load-deformation curve, and ultimate compressive load were analysed. Following that, the impacts of section size, yield strength of the steel tube, axial compressive strength of concrete, steel ratio, slenderness ratio, and load eccentricity on its ultimate compressive load are comprehensively investigated. The results demonstrate that the ultimate compressive load of the SCFST-LC decreases significantly with the increase in corrosion rate. The corrosion rate increases from 10 to 40%, and the ultimate bearing capacity decreases by 37.6%. Its ultimate bearing capacity can be enhanced due to the increase in section size, material strength, and steel ratio. In contrast, the ascending slenderness ratio and load eccentricity has harmful effects on the ultimate compressive load of the specimens. Finally, a simplified formula for the axial compressive load of the SCFST-LC under eccentric compression after acid rain corrosion is proposed. The calculation accuracy is high and the deviation of the results is basically within 15%, which is in good agreement with the numerical simulation results.Entities:
Keywords: acid rain corrosion; concrete-filled square steel tube long column; eccentric compression; finite element analysis; ultimate bearing capacity
Year: 2021 PMID: 34069286 PMCID: PMC8156212 DOI: 10.3390/ma14102568
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Schematic diagram of mesh dividing and boundary conditions of the finite element model.
The main design parameters in [35].
| Model Number | ∆ | Ref. | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC-50-0 | 160 × 1250 × 3.64 | 0 | 53.5 | 342.5 | 0 | 50 | 1095.00 | [ |
| NC-50-1 | 160 × 1250 × 3.64 | 0.36 | 53.5 | 342.5 | 10 | 50 | 970.00 | |
| NC-50-2 | 160 × 1250 × 3.64 | 0.758 | 53.5 | 342.5 | 20 | 50 | 805.00 | |
| NC-25-2 | 160 × 1250 × 3.64 | 0.758 | 53.5 | 342.5 | 20 | 25 | 1105.00 | |
| S3-0-0 | 80 × 300 × 3.0 | 0.00 | 49.8 | 358 | 0 | 0 | 606.25 | [ |
| S3-0-10 | 80 × 300 × 3.0 | 0.30 | 49.8 | 358 | 10 | 0 | 543.75 | |
| S3-0-20 | 80 × 300 × 3.0 | 0.60 | 49.8 | 358 | 20 | 0 | 493.75 | |
| S3-0-30 | 80 × 300 × 3.0 | 0.90 | 49.8 | 358 | 30 | 0 | 456.25 | |
| S4.5-0-0 | 80 × 300 × 4.5 | 0.00 | 49.8 | 358 | 0 | 0 | 774.78 | |
| S4.5-0-10 | 80 × 300 × 4.5 | 0.45 | 49.8 | 358 | 10 | 0 | 704.35 | |
| S4.5-0-20 | 80 × 300 × 4.5 | 0.90 | 49.8 | 358 | 20 | 0 | 610.44 | |
| S4.5-0-30 | 80 × 300 × 4.5 | 1.35 | 49.8 | 358 | 30 | 0 | 547.83 |
Note, B and t are the side length of specimen and the initial thickness of steel tube; ∆t is the wall thickness reduction of steel tube due to corrosion; γ is the corrosion rate; N is the test value of the bearing capacity of specimen; e is the load eccentricity.
Numerical modelling results of specimens with acid rain corrosion.
| Model Number | Ref. | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC-50-0 | 160 × 1250 × 3.64 | 1095 | 1078.48 | 1058.34 | 1.02 | 1.03 | [ |
| NC-50-1 | 160 × 1250 × 3.64 | 970 | 941.44 | 927.87 | 1.03 | 1.04 | |
| NC-50-2 | 160 × 1250 × 3.64 | 805 | 840.82 | 825.35 | 0.96 | 0.98 | |
| NC-25-2 | 160 × 1250 × 3.64 | 1105 | 1076.92 | 1133.61 | 1.03 | 0.97 | |
| Average value | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||
| Variance | 0.001 | 0.001 | |||||
| S3-0-0 | 80 × 300 × 3 | 606.25 | - | 625.46 | - | 0.97 | [ |
| S3-0-10 | 80 × 300 × 3 | 543.75 | - | 573.08 | - | 0.95 | |
| S3-0-20 | 80 × 300 × 3 | 493.75 | - | 511.82 | - | 0.96 | |
| S3-0-30 | 80 × 300 × 3 | 456.25 | - | 461.98 | - | 0.99 | |
| S4.5-0-0 | 80 × 300 × 4.5 | 774.78 | - | 814.8 | - | 0.95 | |
| S4.5-0-10 | 80 × 300 × 4.5 | 704.35 | - | 701.1 | - | 1.00 | |
| S4.5-0-20 | 80 × 300 × 4.5 | 610.44 | - | 610.99 | - | 1.00 | |
| S4.5-0-30 | 80 × 300 × 4.5 | 547.83 | - | 546.47 | - | 1.00 | |
| Average value | - | 0.98 | |||||
| Variance | - | 0.001 | |||||
Note, N is the numerical modeling results in references; N is the numerical modeling results obtained by using the constitutive relation equation proposed in this paper.
Figure 2Simulation verification results of Ref. [34]. (a) NC-50-0; (b) NC-50-10; (c) NC-50-20; (d) NC-25-20.
Figure 3Results verification of Ref. [35]. (a) S3-0-0; (b) S3-0-10; (c) S3-0-20; (d) S3-0-30; (e) S4.5-0-0; (f) S4.5-0-10; (g) S4.5-0-20; (h) S4.5-0-30.
Main design parameters of models.
| Model Number | ∆ |
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-40-345-0.11-0 | 160 × 1200 × 4 | 0 | 40 | 40 | 345 | 0 | 0.11 | 1043.32 |
| S-40-345-0.11-10 | 160 × 1200 × 4 | 0.4 | 40 | 40 | 345 | 10 | 0.11 | 929.41 |
| S-40-345-0.11-20 | 160 × 1200 × 4 | 0.8 | 40 | 40 | 345 | 20 | 0.11 | 824.95 |
| S-40-345-0.11-30 | 160 × 1200 × 4 | 1.2 | 40 | 40 | 345 | 30 | 0.11 | 721.63 |
| S-40-345-0.11-40 | 160 × 1200 × 4 | 1.6 | 40 | 40 | 345 | 40 | 0.11 | 651.72 |
Note: In the model number, S represents that the cross-section of a specimen is square. The first number denotes the compressive strength of the concrete cube. The second number means the yield strength of the steel tube. The third number indicates the initial steel ratio of a specimen (α = A/A, A is the initial cross-sectional area of the steel tube, A represents the cross-sectional area of the concrete). The fourth number states the corrosion rate. For example, S-40-235-0.11-0 means that the specimen is a concrete-filled square steel tube column. The compressive strength of its concrete cube and the yield strength of its steel tube are 40 and 345 MPa, respectively. Its initial steel ratio is 0.11 and its corrosion rate is 0%.
Figure 4Schematic diagram of the failure mode of concrete-filled square steel tube long column subjected to eccentric loads with different corrosion rates (a) γ = 0%; (b) γ = 10%; (c) γ = 20%; (d) γ = 30%; (e) γ = 40% (U is the buckling displacement, unit: mm).
Figure 5Stress cloud diagram (a) steel tube (b) concrete.
Figure 6Steel tube-concrete normal contact force distribution at peak load point (unit: N). (a) γ = 0%; (b) γ = 10%; (c) γ = 20%; (d) γ = 30%; (e) γ = 40%.
Figure 7Load-vertical displacement curve of specimen.
Figure 8The ultimate bearing capacity of the specimen under different corrosion rates.
Figure 9The influence of different parameters on the ultimate bearing capacity of specimens (a) section size; (b) steel pipe yield strength; (c) concrete axial compressive strength; (d) steel ratio; (e) slenderness; (f) load eccentricity.
Figure 10Comparison between the ultimate bearing capacity obtained by numerical modelling and simplified formula.