| Literature DB >> 34069093 |
Yen-Cheng Chen1, Ching-Sung Lee2, Shuo-Hui Kuan2.
Abstract
Given the development of food tourism, food culture has become an important motivation for tourists. This study focuses on food tourism and examines the effects of message appeal and personality traits (food neophilia or neophobia) on tourists' willingness to consume pig blood cake (PBC) and meatballs, two rice-based Taiwanese street foods. A total of 181 valid questionnaires were administered to foreign tourists in Taiwan (the majority of subjects were Europeans and Americans) through snowball sampling. The questionnaires were analysed using the AMOS 6.0 statistical software package. Foreign tourists' food neophobia or neophilia was found to significantly affect their willingness to consume rice-based Taiwanese street food (PBC and meatballs) and to strongly regulate the effect of message appeal on their willingness to consume the two delicacies. Past studies on food neophobia/neophilia traits have mostly focused on Western and European foods and have rarely investigated the effect of message appeal on the consumption of traditional rice-based street food in Eastern Asia (e.g., Taiwanese special delicacies). This study's most important contribution is that food neophilia or neophobia moderates the message appeal effect on foreign tourists' intention to consume local delicacies. This finding has implications for the hospitality industry and relevant government agencies in Asia for the marketing and promotion of food tourism.Entities:
Keywords: food neophilia; food neophobia; food tourism; personality trait; rice-based delicacies
Year: 2021 PMID: 34069093 PMCID: PMC8157230 DOI: 10.3390/foods10051093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Demographic characteristics (n = 181).
| Characteristics | N | Percentage | Characteristics | N | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| Male | 84 | 46.4 | High school, vocational school | 26 | 14.4 |
| Female | 97 | 53.6 | College | 110 | 60.8 |
|
| Graduate school | 45 | 24.9 | ||
| 15–20 | 37 | 20.4 | |||
| 21–25 | 57 | 31.6 |
| ||
| 26–30 | 40 | 22.1 | Agriculture, fisheries and manufacturing | 7 | 3.9 |
| 31–35 | 19 | 10.5 | Service industry | 11 | 6.1 |
| 36–40 | 28 | 15.4 | Other | 73 | 40.3 |
|
|
| ||||
| Southeast Asian | 40 | 22.1 | Have not been to other countries | 15 | 8.3 |
| New Zealander or Australian | 10 | 5.5 | 1–5 countries | 83 | 45.9 |
| European | 7 | 3.9 | 6–10 countries | 54 | 29.8 |
| West Asian | 35 | 19.3 | 11–15 countries | 10 | 5.5 |
| North American | 72 | 39.8 | 16–20 countries | 10 | 5.5 |
| Central or South American | 11 | 6.1 | More than 21 countries | 9 | 5.0 |
| Other | 6 | 3.3 | |||
Note: West Asia includes Turkey, Cyprus, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Iran, Israel, Jordan, Egypt, Sudan, Libya and the Arabian Peninsula countries.
Effect of message appeal type on foreigners’ willingness to eat meatballs (n = 181).
| Variable | Message Appeal | Number of People | Mean | Standard Deviation | Source of Variation | df | MS | F | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willingness to eat meatballs | No appeal | 50 | 3.67 | 0.59 | Inter-group | 2.00 | 0.11 | 0.25 | 0.78 |
| Rational appeal | 61 | 3.58 | 0.74 | Intra-group | 178.00 | 0.46 | |||
| Emotional appeal | 70 | 3.61 | 0.67 | Total | 180.00 |
Effect of message appeal on foreigners’ willingness to eat PBC (n = 181).
| Variable | Message Appeal | Number of People | Mean | Standard Deviation | Source of Variation | df | MS | F | Sig. | Scheffe |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willingness to eat PBC | No appeal | 50 | 3.59 | 0.82 | Inter-group | 2.00 | 8.40 | 8.67 | 0.00 *** | 1 > 3 > 2 |
| Rational appeal | 61 | 2.81 | 1.12 | Intra-group | 178.00 | 0.97 | ||||
| Emotional appeal | 70 | 3.22 | 0.97 | Total | 180.00 |
Note: *** p < 0.001.
Effect of food-related personality traits on foreigners’ willingness to eat meatballs (n = 181).
| Variable | Food-Related Personality Trait | Number of People | Mean | Standard Deviation | t | df | Sig. (2-Tailed) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willingness to eat meatballs | Neophilia | 64 | 3.80 | 0.48 | 3.13 | 174 | 0.00 ** |
| Neophobia | 117 | 3.52 | 0.74 | ||||
| Willingness to eat PBC | Neophilia | 64 | 3.62 | 1.04 | 4.43 | 179 | 0.00 *** |
| Neophobia | 117 | 2.95 | 0.94 |
Note: ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Hierarchical regression analysis of the effect of food neophilia/neophobia personality traits, message appeal type and their interaction on foreigners’ willingness to eat meatballs.
| Block 1 | Block 2 | Block 3 | Block 4 | Block 5 | Block 6 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables in the Model | Beta | Beta | Beta | Beta | Beta | Beta | |
|
| Gender | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.03 |
| Age | −0.06 | −0.07 | −0.07 | −0.08 | −0.08 | −0.08 | |
| Educational level (college as benchmark) | |||||||
| High school, vocational school, or below | −0.23 | −0.28 | −0.27 | −0.23 | −0.24 | −0.21 | |
| Graduate school | −0.24 | −0.24 * | −0.24 * | −0.28 * | −0.27 * | −0.26 * | |
| Occupation (student as benchmark) | |||||||
| Agriculture, fisheries and manufacturing | 0.39 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.34 | |
| Service industry | −0.15 | −0.21 | −0.21 | −0.20 | −0.18 | −0.18 | |
| Other | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.00 | −0.01 | |
| Nationality (North American as benchmark) | |||||||
| Southeast Asian | −0.14 | −0.18 | −0.16 | −0.08 | −0.05 | ||
| New Zealander or Australian | −0.04 | −0.04 | 0.01 | −0.01 | −0.02 | ||
| European | −0.05 | −0.04 | −0.09 | −0.10 | −0.11 | ||
| West Asian | −0.81 *** | −0.80 * | −0.85 * | −0.80 *** | −0.81 *** | ||
| Central or South American | −0.13 | −0.14 | −0.14 | −0.07 | −0.08 | ||
| Other | −0.47 | −0.49 | −0.47 | −0.34 | −0.30 | ||
| Number of countries visited | −0.03 | −0.02 | 0.00 | −0.01 | |||
| Number of Asian countries visited | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |||
| Message appeal type (no appeal as benchmark) | |||||||
| Rational appeal | −0.24 | −0.21 | 0.02 | ||||
| Emotional appeal | −0.13 | −0.08 | −0.03 | ||||
| Food neophilia/neophobia | −0.25 * | −0.09 | |||||
| Rational appeal*Food neophilia/neophobia trait | −0.39 | ||||||
| Emotional appeal*Food neophilia/neophobia trait | −0.10 | ||||||
|
|
| 0.08 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.21 |
|
| 2.13 * | 2.37 ** | 2.07 * | 2.03 * | 2.24 ** | 2.15 ** | |
| ∆ | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | |
| 2.13 * | 2.52 * | 0.26 | 1.57 | 4.97 * | 1.27 | ||
Dependent variable: willingness to eat meatballs. Note: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Hierarchical regression analysis of the effect of food neophilia/neophobia personality traits, types of message appeals and their interaction on foreigners’ willingness to eat PBC.
| Block 1 | Block 2 | Block 3 | Block 4 | Block 5 | Block 6 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables in the Model | Beta | Beta | Beta | Beta | Beta | Beta | |
|
| Gender | −0.11 | −0.11 | −0.10 | −0.06 | −0.09 | −0.09 |
| Age | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.03 | |
| Education level (college as benchmark) | |||||||
| High school, vocational school, or below | −0.11 | −0.14 | −0.13 | −0.10 | −0.11 | −0.13 | |
| Graduate school | −0.13 | −0.14 | −0.13 | −0.19 * | −0.18 * | −0.16 * | |
| Occupation (student as benchmark) | |||||||
| Agriculture, fisheries and manufacturing | −0.02 | −0.05 | −0.05 | −0.03 | −0.04 | −0.04 | |
| Service industry | −0.10 | −0.15 | −0.15 | −0.15 | −0.13 | −0.14 | |
| Other | −0.10 | −0.15 | −0.16 | −0.15 | −0.19 | −0.19 * | |
| Nationality (North American as benchmark) | |||||||
| Southeast Asian | −0.26 * | −0.29 * | −0.28 * | −0.20 * | −0.21 * | ||
| New Zealander or Australian | −0.08 | −0.08 | −0.05 | −0.06 | −0.05 | ||
| European | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.00 | −0.01 | 0.00 | ||
| West Asian | −0.07 | −0.07 | −0.10 | −0.08 | −0.06 | ||
| Central or South American | −0.05 | −0.06 | −0.05 | −0.02 | −0.01 | ||
| Other | −0.14 | −0.14 | −0.14 | −0.08 | −0.10 | ||
| Number of countries visited | −0.07 | −0.03 | 0.01 | 0.00 | |||
| Number of Asian countries visited | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.02 | |||
| Message appeal (no appeal as benchmark) | |||||||
| Rational appeal | −0.35 *** | −0.32 *** | −0.30 * | ||||
| Emotional appeal | −0.24 * | −0.18 | 0.07 | ||||
| Food neophilia/neophobia trait | −0.28 *** | −0.13 | |||||
| Rational appeal*Food neophilia/neophobia trait | −0.03 | ||||||
| Emotional appeal*Food neophilia/neophobia trait | −0.35 * | ||||||
|
|
| 0.04 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.30 |
|
| 1.13 | 1.97 * | 1.74 * | 2.50 * | 3.32 *** | 3.38 *** | |
| ∆ | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.03 | |
| 1.13 | 2.88 | 0.30 | 7.27 *** | 13.89 *** | 3.11 * | ||
Dependent variable: willingness to eat PBC. Note: * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001.