| Literature DB >> 34069037 |
Lin Chen1,2,3, Jian-Xin Hu1,2, Chang Liu1,2, Jiao Liu1,2, Zhen-Bao Ma1,2, Zi-Yun Tang1,2, Ya-Fei Li3, Zhen-Ling Zeng1,2.
Abstract
Previous studies on the prevalence and transmission mechanism of oxazolidinone resistance gene poxtA in CoNS are lacking, which this study addresses. By screening 763 CoNS isolates from different sources of several livestock farms in Guangdong, China, 2018-2020, we identified that the poxtA was present in seven CoNS isolates of pig and feed origins. Species identification and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) confirmed that seven poxtA-positive CoNS isolates were composed of five ST64-Staphylococcus haemolyticus and two Staphylococcus saprophyticus isolates. All poxtA-positive Staphylococcus haemolyticus isolates shared similar pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns. Transformation assays demonstrated all poxtA-positive isolates were able to transfer poxtA gene to Staphylococcus aureus RN4220. S1-PFGE and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) revealed the presence of poxtA-carrying plasmids in size around 54.7 kb. The plasmid pY80 was 55,758 bp in size and harbored the heavy metal resistance gene czcD and antimicrobial resistance genes, poxtA, aadD, fexB and tet(L). The regions (IS1216E-poxtA-IS1216E) in plasmid pY80 were identified in Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. with different genetic and source backgrounds. In conclusion, this was the first report about the poxtA gene in Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus saprophyticus, and IS1216 may play an important role in the dissemination of poxtA among different Gram-positive bacteria.Entities:
Keywords: CoNS; IS1216; antimicrobial; heavy metal; plasmids; poxtA; transformation
Year: 2021 PMID: 34069037 PMCID: PMC8156375 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10050601
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathogens ISSN: 2076-0817
Background information on the 7 CoNS isolates carrying the poxtA gene.
| Isolate | Sampling Time | Origin (Farm Type) | Species | MLST |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| June 2018 | Feed sample (chicken farm A) |
| – |
|
| December 2018 | swine nasal swab (pig farm D) |
| ST64 |
|
| December 2018 | swine nasal swab (pig farm D) |
| ST64 |
|
| December 2018 | swine nasal swab (pig farm D) |
| ST64 |
|
| December 2018 | swine nasal swab (pig farm D) |
| ST64 |
|
| December 2018 | swine nasal swab (pig farm D) |
| ST64 |
|
| December 2018 | swine nasal swab (pig farm D) |
| – |
MLST: “–” indicates that S. saprophyticus cannot be typed by MLST.
Figure 1Genomic analysis of five Staphylococcus haemolyticus isolates carrying poxtA and cfr and two Staphylococcus saprophyticus isolates carrying poxtA of various origins in Guangdong, China. Phylogenic tree was constructed using CSI Phylogeny 1.4. Sources of the isolates are indicated by different colors for geographic regions (squares), farms (stars), hosts (circles) and sample origins (squares). Antimicrobial resistance genes are indicated by the following method: purple, positive; white, negative.
Characterization of poxtA-positive strains, their electrotransformants and the recipient strain.
| Bacterial Isolate | MICs (mg/L) | Resistance Genes | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMO | PEN | FOX | GEN | AMI | NEO | KAN | DOX | TET | TIG | FFC | ERY | RIF | VAN | CIP | ENR | LZD | TZD | SXT | ||
|
| 0.125 | 0.125 | 2 | 0.25 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 2 | 0.25 | 0.008 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 0.25 | - |
|
| 8 | 16 | 8 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 1 | 0.25 | >64 | >64 | 0.25 | >64 | >256 | 0.015 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 0.5 | |
|
| 0.06 | 0.125 | 2 | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 1 | 2 | 0.06 | 32 | >256 | 0.008 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 0.25 | |
|
| 2 | 4 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 8 | >64 | >64 | 0.25 | >64 | >256 | 0.004 | 1 | >64 | 32 | 2 | 0.06 | 2 | |
|
| 0.06 | 0.125 | 2 | 0.125 | 2 | 1 | 0.25 | 1 | 2 | 0.125 | 32 | 0.125 | 0.008 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 0.25 | |
|
| 4 | 4 | 32 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 64 | >64 | 0.25 | >64 | >256 | 0.004 | 1 | >64 | >64 | 2 | 0.25 | 8 | |
|
| 0.06 | 0.125 | 2 | 0.125 | 2 | 1 | 0.25 | 2 | 2 | 0.125 | 32 | 0.125 | 0.008 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 0.25 | |
|
| 4 | 4 | 32 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 64 | >64 | 0.25 | >64 | >256 | 0.004 | 1 | >64 | >64 | 4 | 0.5 | 16 | |
|
| 0.06 | 0.125 | 2 | 0.125 | 2 | 1 | 0.25 | 2 | 1 | 0.125 | 32 | 0.125 | 0.008 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 0.25 | |
|
| 2 | 1 | 32 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 64 | 64 | 0.25 | >64 | >256 | 0.008 | 1 | >64 | >64 | 2 | 0.5 | 8 | |
|
| 0.06 | 0.125 | 2 | 0.125 | 2 | 1 | 0.25 | 1 | 1 | 0.25 | 32 | >256 | 0.002 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 0.25 | |
|
| 2 | 4 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 64 | >64 | 0.25 | >64 | >256 | 0.004 | 1 | >64 | >64 | 4 | 0.25 | 16 | |
|
| 0.06 | 0.125 | 2 | 0.125 | 2 | 1 | 0.25 | 1 | 2 | 0.25 | 32 | 0.125 | 0.008 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 0.25 | |
|
| 16 | 16 | 16 | 8 | 0.5 | 4 | 8 | 32 | 64 | 0.25 | 64 | >256 | 0.03 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0.25 | 1 | |
|
| 0.06 | 0.125 | 1 | 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.06 | 2 | 0.03 | 16 | 0.125 | 0.002 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 0.25 | |
AMO, amoxicillin; PEN, penicillin; FOX, cefoxitin; GEN, gentamicin; AMI, NEO, neomycin; KAN, kanamycin; amikacin; DOX, doxycycline; TET, tetracycline; TIG, tigecycline; FFC, florfenicol; ERY, erythromycin; RIF, rifampicin; VAN, vancomycin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; ENR, enrofloxacin; LZD, linezolid; TZD, tedizolid; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Resistance genes: “–” indicates that no resistance gene was shown in the area. MICs (mg/L) shaded grey represent strains that were resistant to the corresponding antimicrobial agents; despite the lack of clinical breakpoints applicable to staphylococci, the MICs of neomycin and kanamycin were detected in poxtA-positive strains, their electrotransformants and the recipient strain S. aureus RN4220.
Figure 2Annotation of plasmid pY80. Circles were displayed (inside to outside) (i) size in bp; (ii) GC content; (iii) GC skew; (iv) positions and directions of predicted coding sequences are indicated by colored arrows according to their predicted functions. Red arrows represent resistance genes, teal arrows represent heavy meatal resistance genes, orange arrows represent genes involved in transfer or transposition, gray arrows represent plasmid replication genes, blue arrows represent genes of unknown functions or other functions.
Figure 3Comparison of the genetic contexts of poxtA in plasmid pY80 investigated in this study with corresponding sequences in other plasmids and genomic DNA. Arrows indicate the positions and orientations of the genes. Antimicrobial resistance genes are shown in red. Mobile element regions are underlined in yellow. Insertion sequences are indicated as boxes, with the arrow inside the box showing the transposase gene. Genes with unknown functions and other functions are shown in light blue. Regions of >98% nucleotide sequence identity are shaded grey. Δ indicates an incomplete gene.