| Literature DB >> 34068665 |
Gabriela Woźniak1, Damian Chmura2, Eugeniusz Małkowski1, Paulina Zieleźnik-Rusinowska1, Krzysztof Sitko1, Barbara Ziemer3, Agnieszka Błońska1.
Abstract
Some sites transformed or created by humans (novel ecosystem) are different both in vegetation and ecosystems establishment and development. The unknown habitat conditions and new species composition is resulting in new abiotic and biotic systems. To improve the understanding of the process governing the relationships between the environmental factors, plant species assemblages and their arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation were studied in chronosequence on post-coal mine heaps. We hypothesized that AMF root colonization will be dependent on the age of heap and not on the dominant plant species (vegetation type). The high frequency of mycorrhizal colonization of roots (F%) of Poa compressa- and Calamagrostis epigejos-dominated vegetation type was stated. All mycorrhizal parameters were lower in C. epigejos roots when compared to P. compressa (ranging from 60% to 90%). The highest relative mycorrhizal intensity, M%, and mean abundance of arbuscula, A%, in the roots of both examined plants were recorded in vegetation patches dominated by Daucus carota. Positive and statistically significant correlations were found between F%, M%, and A%, and lack of correlation between the heaps' age and mycorrhizal parameters, and statistically significant correlations between A% and potassium and magnesium content were revealed. The interspecific relations in the novel ecosystems become more complex along with the increase of diversity.Entities:
Keywords: mycorrhiza colonization; non-analogous species assemblages; novel ecosystems; spontaneous succession; vegetation development
Year: 2021 PMID: 34068665 PMCID: PMC8151521 DOI: 10.3390/plants10050949
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
The experiment design scheme.
| Age of Heap | Dominant Plant Species | Tested Individuals | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Class I |
| four paches | 40 | |
| Class I |
| three paches | 30 | |
| Class II |
| five paches | 50 | |
| Class II |
| four paches | 40 | |
| Class II |
| four paches | 40 | |
| Class II |
| three paches | 30 | |
| Class III |
| two paches | 20 | |
| Class III |
| two paches | 20 | |
| Class IV |
| three paches | 30 | |
| Class IV |
| three paches | 30 | |
Letter “A” after the species name indicates the tree form, letter “B” after species name indicates the shrub form, and species name without letter indicates the herb layer. Class I—up to 10 years old; Class II—10–30 years old; Class III—30–60 years old; Class IV—over 60 years old heap.
Physico-chemical properties of the substrate from the rhizosphere zone of the target species growing in the studied vegetation patches on coal mine heaps.
| Heap Age | Vegetation Type | The Studied Species Indivi-duals | pH (KCl) | P | K | Mg | orgC | N-NH4 | Conductivity µS cm−1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class I |
|
| 6.47 ± 0.18 | 3.57 ± 0.77 | 13.97 ± 3.62 | 26.67 ± 3.06 | 10.00 ± 0.46 | 3.28 ± 2.70 | 175.00 ± 32.65 |
| Class II |
|
| 5.51 ± 0.68 | 4.02 ± 0.22 | 15.63 ± 1.65 | 32.50 ± 3.73 | 10.10 ± 0.74 | 1.38 ± 0.20 | 136.00 ± 21.72 |
| Class II |
|
| 5.73 ± 0.49 | 6.60 ± 0.61 | 16.13 ± 5.48 | 16.27 ± 7.23 | 15.63 ± 6.82 | 3.10 ± 0.49 | 82.67 ± 5.36 |
| Class III |
|
| 5.30 ± 0.89 | 6.20 ± 1.65 | 17.83 ± 0.62 | 22.27 ± 3.56 | 9.00 ± 1.72 | 2.50 ± 0.78 | 111.00 ± 21.38 |
| Class IV |
|
| 4.60 ± 0.18 | 4.77 ± 1.33 | 9.87 ± 2.55 | 10.97 ± 5.40 | 7.57 ± 3.58 | 2.74 ± 1.35 | 74.33 ± 9.84 |
| Class III |
|
| 6.75 ± 0.07 | 4.70 ± 0.85 | 4.15 ± 0.50 | 15.10 ± 1.98 | 18.70 ± 0.57 | 5.92 ± 0.54 | 123.00 ± 18.38 |
| Class I |
|
| 6.27 ± 0.17 | 4.08 ± 0.32 | 15.70 ± 0.34 | 32.00 ± 2.02 | 6.90 ± 0.44 | 1.86 ± 0.20 | 166.50 ± 23.09 |
| Class II |
|
| 4.59 ± 0.62 | 5.60 ± 0.95 | 16.05 ± 4.60 | 18.88 ± 4.25 | 13.22 ± 5.86 | 3.46 ± 0.97 | 242.30 ± 78.59 |
| Class II |
|
| 6.23 ± 0.36 | 4.94 ± 0.72 | 19.50 ± 2.22 | 27.68 ± 2.72 | 7.38 ± 1.21 | 2.93 ± 1.08 | 198.00 ± 97.75 |
| Class IV |
|
| 6.55 ± 1.13 | 4.40 ± 1.76 | 13.47 ± 0.18 | 23.67 ± 4.76 | 10.00 ± 3.63 | 2.60 ± 0.74 | 73.00 ± 3.79 |
Results are means ± SE (n = 35); orgC—organic carbon. Letter “A” after the species name indicates the tree form, letter “B” after species name indicates the shrub form, species name without a capital letter indicates the herb layer.
Figure 1The mycorrhizal parameters (Mean ± SE) in the root system of Poa compressa in the vegetation patches dominated by Pc—Poa compressa, Ce—Calamagrostis epigejos, Dc—Daucus carota, and BpA—Betula pendula tree individuals. Results of ANOVA: ns—non-significant, * p < 0.05. The various letters above bars denote the significance of differences at p < 0.05 after LSD test.
Figure 2The mycorrhizal parameters (Mean ± SE) in the root system of Calamagrostis epigejos in the vegetation patches dominated by Pc—Poa compressa, Ce—Calamagrostis epigejos, Dc—Daucus carota, BpB—Betula pendula shrub, BpA—Betula pendula tree, and PsB—Pinus sylvestris shrub. Results of ANOVA: ns—non-significant, * p < 0.05. The various letters above bars denote significance of differences at p < 0.05 after LSD test.
The inclusion of analyzed factors in the RDA model showing their impact on root colonization of studied plants.
| Code | Description | Df | AIC | Pseudo-F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mg | Mg (mg/100 g) | 1 | 240.56 | 4.3205 | 0.015 |
| K | K2O (mg/100 g) | 1 | 241.78 | 3.0345 | 0.020 |
| Age | Mg (mg/100 g) | 1 | 241.36 | 3.4667 | 0.025 |
| DCA1 | DCA axis 1 | 1 | 241.82 | 2.9982 | 0.035 |
| CE |
| 1 | 243.54 | 1.2636 | NS |
| PC |
| 1 | 243.54 | 1.2636 | NS |
| DCA2 | DCA axis 2 | 1 | 243.62 | 1.1863 | NS |
| Year | Year of study | 1 | 244.14 | 0.6832 | NS |
| P | P2O5 (mg/100 g) | 1 | 244.36 | 0.4712 | NS |
| pH | pH | 1 | 244.69 | 0.1569 | NS |
Figure 3Tri-plot of RDA based on mycorrhizal parameters showing samples in four classes of age (1–4) and environmental factors.
Figure 4The Venn diagrams showing variance partitioning among RDA constraints.
The summary of the main results of the study conducted on Calamagrostis epigejos and Poa compressa and AMF colonization.
| Species | Soil | Spoil | Method | AMF | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| loess, perlite, Czech Republik | coal mine | Trouvelot | 94% | [ |
| loess, clay, perlite, Czech Republik | coal mine | Trouvelot | 80% | [ | |
| clay, Czech Republik | contains fly ash | Giovanetti and Mosse | present, no data | [ | |
| loess, Czech Republik | coal mine | Trouvelot | 75–97% | [ | |
| gravel, sand, loess, | fireloam strip mine | McGonigle et al. | present, no data | [ | |
| caolinite-montmorilonite-illite clays | industral areas | Giovanetti and Mosse | present, no data | [ | |
| clay, Czech Republik | coal mine | Giovanetti and Mosse | present | [ | |
|
| calcareous slope with thin-layered rendzina soil | exposed to emissions of a nearby phosphate fertilizer factory | McGonigle et al. | present 12–42% | [ |
| peat-vermiculite | - | McGonigle et al. | present | [ | |
| clay | - | - | 40% | [ | |
| mulched | coal mine | McGonigle et al. | 5–95% | [ | |
| clay, rocks | serpentine open-pit mine | McGonigle et al. | present | [ |