| Literature DB >> 34068155 |
Andrea Bernardos1,2,3, Matěj Božik1, Ana Montero1, Édgar Pérez-Esteve4, Esther García-Casado5, Miloslav Lhotka5, Adéla Fraňková1, María Dolores Marcos2,3, José Manuel Barat4, Ramón Martínez-Máñez2,3, Pavel Klouček1.
Abstract
Essential oil components (EOCs) such as eugenol play a significant role in plant antimicrobial defense. Due to the volatility and general reactivity of these molecules, plants have evolved smart systems for their storage and release, which are key prerequisites for their efficient use. In this study, biomimetic systems for the controlled release of eugenol, inspired by natural plant defense mechanisms, were prepared and their antifungal activity is described. Delivery and antifungal studies of mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN) loaded with eugenol and capped with different saccharide gates-starch, maltodextrin, maltose and glucose-against fungus Aspergillus niger-were performed. The maltodextrin- and maltose-capped systems show very low eugenol release in the absence of the fungus Aspergillus niger but high cargo delivery in its presence. The anchored saccharides are degraded by exogenous enzymes, resulting in eugenol release and efficient inhibition of fungal growth.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus niger; antifungal; antimicrobial; essential oil component; exogenous enzyme; nanoparticles
Year: 2021 PMID: 34068155 PMCID: PMC8153022 DOI: 10.3390/nano11051280
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Content (α) of saccharide gates and eugenol per gram of MSNs.
| System | αsaccharide | αeugenol |
|---|---|---|
| MSN-Eu | - | 0.5 |
| Glucose-MSN-Eu | 0.195 | 0.069 |
| Maltose-MSN-Eu | 0.188 | 0.076 |
| Maltodextrin-MSN-Eu | 0.175 | 0.082 |
| Starch-MSN-Eu | 0.294 | 0.036 |
Figure 1Representation of the Saccharide-MSN-Eu system in the presence of exogenous fungal enzymes.
Figure 2Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of the scaffolds and systems: (a) MCM-41 type as-made, (b) MSN, (c) MSN-Eu, (d) Glucose-MSN-Eu, (e) Maltose-MSN-Eu, (f) Maltodextrin-MSN-Eu and (g) Starch-MSN-Eu.
Figure 3Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms for (a) MSN, (b) MSN-Eu and (c) Maltodextrin-MSN-Eu. The insets in each graph show the pore size distributions of the systems.
BET-specific surface values, pore volumes and pore sizes calculated from the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms for selected materials.
| Pore Volume | Pore Size | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| MSN (MCM-41 type) | 825 | 1.1 | 2.4 |
| MSN-Eu | 101.5 | 0.41 | - |
| Maltodextrin-MSN-Eu | 67.7 | 0.59 | - |
Pore volumes and pore sizes associated with intraparticle mesopores. Pore size estimated by using the BJH model applied on the adsorption branch of the isotherm.
Hydrodynamic diameter of materials measured by DLS and zeta potential measurements.
| Hydrodynamic Particle Diameter (nm) | Zeta Potential (mV) | |
|---|---|---|
| MSN (MCM-41 type) | 105 ± 2 | −39.5 ± 0.9 |
| MSN-Eu | 108 ± 3 | −40.0 ± 0.9 |
| Maltodextrin-MSN-Eu | 174 ± 8 | 42 ± 2 |
Figure 4TEM images of bare MSN (a) and Maltodextrin-MSN-Eu (b), and FESEM images of bare MSN (c) and Maltodextrin-MSN-Eu (d), showing the typical shape and structured pores of the MCM-41 matrix.
Figure 5Kinetic release profile of eugenol from Maltodextrin-MSN-Eu in the absence and presence of fungi in the SPME assay after 15 d.
Minimal inhibitory doses (MIDs, mg/Petri dish) of eugenol and mesoporous silica systems with different saccharide gates.
| 3 d | 6 d | 15 d | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eugenol | 2.5 | N | N |
| MSN-Eu | 0.5 | 1.5 | N |
| Glucose-MSN-Eu | 0.69 | N | N |
| Maltose-MSN-Eu | 0.38 | 0.76 | 0.76 |
| Maltodextrin-MSN-Eu | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.41 |
| Starch-MSN-Eu | 0.54 | N | N |
| N: no fungal inhibition | - | - | - |
Figure 6The degree of antifungal activity according to luminosity measurement for 15 d. The values are the ratios of the respective material to the growth control. The higher the relative luminosity, the greater the difference in inhibition compared with the growth control.