| Literature DB >> 34067894 |
Yury M Shulga1,2, Eugene N Kabachkov1,3, Vitaly I Korepanov4, Igor I Khodos4, Dmitry Y Kovalev5, Alexandr V Melezhik6, Aleksei G Tkachev6, Gennady L Gutsev7.
Abstract
The alkaline activation of a carbonized graphene oxide/dextrin mixture yielded a carbon-based nanoscale material (AC-TR) with a unique highly porous structure. The BET-estimated specific surface area of the material is 3167 m2/g, which is higher than the specific surface area of a graphene layer. The material has a density of 0.34 g/cm3 and electrical resistivity of 0.25 Ω·cm and its properties were studied using the elemental analysis, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), electron diffraction (ED), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray induced Auger electron spectroscopy (XAES), and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) in the plasmon excitation range. From these data, we derive an integral understanding of the structure of this material. The concentration of sp3 carbon atoms was found to be relatively low with an absolute value that depends on the measurement method. It was shown that there is no graphite-like (002) peak in the electron and X-ray diffraction pattern. The characteristic size of a sp2-domain in the basal plane estimated from the Raman spectra was 7 nm. It was also found that plasmon peaks in the EELS spectrum of AC-TR are downshifted compared to those of graphite.Entities:
Keywords: Raman spectroscopy; X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; activated carbon with high specific surface area; concentration of sp3 carbon atoms; electron energy-loss spectroscopy
Year: 2021 PMID: 34067894 PMCID: PMC8156701 DOI: 10.3390/nano11051324
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
SSA values for some carbon materials.
| Material and Fabrication Method | Specific Surface Area, m2/g | References |
|---|---|---|
| alkaline activation of MEGO | 3100 | [ |
| graphene (calculated data) | 2620–2675 | [ |
| alkali-activated carbon | From 3026 to 3708 | [ |
| oxidative activation of pitch-derived carbon fiber | From 1000 to 3000 | [ |
| polymer derived from zinc-mediated coordination copolymerization | >5000 | [ |
| alkaline activation of a mixture graphene oxide and dextrin | 3167 | This work |
| AC used in supercapacitors | 1000–2000 | [ |
Figure 1N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms (A) and pore size distribution curves (B) of our sample. The NLDFT method was used to obtain the pore size distribution.
Elemental composition of the AC-RT sample.
| Content | C | H | N | S | Cl | O | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wt % a | 92.97 ± 0.03 | 0.451 ± 0.069 | 0.65 ± 0.07 | 0.164 ± 0.026 | |||
| at % b | 94.6 5 | 0.15 | >0.1 | 0.31 | 4.69 | >0.2 |
a in weight percent; determined by elemental analysis. b in atomic percent; determined from X-ray photoelectron spectrum.
Figure 2TEM image (A) and electron diffraction patterns (B) of AC-TR. For comparison, the electron diffraction patterns of polycrystalline graphite (C) and SEM image (D) are also shown.
Figure 3X-ray diffraction patterns of AC-TR powder (1), low background monocrystalline Si plate (2) and stick (red) Carbon PDF2 card#000-75-1621 (http://www.icdd.com (accessed on 2 February 2021)) The inset shows the profile analysis of the diffractogram section.
Figure 4Raman spectra of AC-TR (1) and HOPG (2).
Figure 5The AC-TR Raman spectrum in the region of 800–1900 cm−1 and its five-component deconvolution (bands D *, D, D”, G, and D’).
The position (Pos), full width at half maximum (FWHM), and intensity (Int) of each peak in the Raman spectrum of AC-TR.
| Peak | Pos, cm−1 | FWHM, cm−1 | Int, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| D * | 1125.2 | 160.0 | 4.9 |
| D | 1346.0 | 220.0 | 63.1 |
| D | 1537.5 | 161.0 | 20.3 |
| G | 1592.0 | 81.8 | 10.3 |
| D | 1608.0 | 48.0 | 1.4 |
Figure 6The AC-TR wide XPS spectrum. The inset shows the C1s spectrum of the sample and its decomposition (see the text).
The positions (Eb), intensities (I) and peak assignments in the C1s spectrum of AC-TR.
| Peak | Eb, eV | I, % | Assignment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 284.4 | 75.87 | C ( |
| 2 | 285.1 | 15.23 | C ( |
| 3 | 285.9 | 4.38 | C ( |
| 4 | 286.5 | 4.51 | C ( |
Figure 7The X-Ray exited Auger C KVV (A) and the first derivative C KVV spectra (B) for AC-TR and diamond. The spectra in (A) were recorded with a step of 0.03 eV; the spectra in (B) were obtained by differentiating the corresponding spectra (A) using the Savitzky-Golay filter.
Figure 8The electron energy-loss spectra of the AC-TR sample (1) and graphite (2) in the reflection geometry. The energy of exciting electrons is 900 eV.
The peak position in the REELS spectra in Figure 7 and the ratio I of integral intensities.
| Sample | π, eV | (σ + π), eV |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| AC-TR | 5.2 | 25.0 | 0.134 |
| graphite | 6.5 | 26.5 | 0.145 |