| Literature DB >> 34067862 |
Mihaela Turtoi1, Maria Anghelache1, Andrei A Patrascu2, Catalin Maxim2, Ileana Manduteanu1, Manuela Calin1, Delia-Laura Popescu2.
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes became an alarming global health issue since the existing drugs do not preEntities:
Keywords: L-/D-valine Schiff base ligands; anti-diabetic activity; crystallography: insulin-mimetic compounds; oxidovanadium(V) coordination compounds
Year: 2021 PMID: 34067862 PMCID: PMC8156053 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9050562
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomedicines ISSN: 2227-9059
Figure 1Structure formulas of the Schiff base ligands, R-/S-salvalH2 (salval = N-salicylidenvaline) and R-/S-vanvalH2 (vanval = 3-Methoxy-N-salicylidenvaline).
Electronic spectral data of 1 × 10−4 M 1a, 1b, 2a, and 2b complexes in PBS, pH 7.4.
| Compound | λmax | ε | Assignments |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 232 | 35796 | 1st band (232, 233 nm): π → π* transition of the benzene ring and charge-transfer transitions [ |
|
| 232 | 36574 | |
|
| 233 | 34090 | |
|
| 233 | 30692 |
1 CT = charge transfer.
Figure 2Absorption spectra (190 ÷ 450 nm) of 1 × 10−4 M 1a/1b (A) and 2a/2b (B) complexes in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) and CD spectra of 5 × 10−4 M 1a/1b (C) and 2a/2b (D) complexes in PBS, pH 7.4 outright on the prepared solutions (T 0 h) and at 9 h (T 9 h) after preparation.
Figure 3The asymmetric unit with the atom-labeling scheme of 1a. The two independent molecules (I and II) in the asymmetric unit (A) and the hydrogen-bonding scheme between the carboxyl oxygens and the water molecules of 1a (B). Hydrogen atoms have been excluded for clarity.
Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles () for 1a.
| Bond | (Å) | Angle | (o) | Angle | (o) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V1—O12 | 1.589(5) | O12—V1—O3 | 101.4(3) | O4—V2—O14 | 101.9(5) |
| V1—O3 | 1.814(5) | O12—V1—O15 | 100.8(3) | O4—V2—O10 | 102.4(4) |
| V1—O15 | 1.824(6) | O3—V1—O15 | 108.4(3) | O14—V2—O10 | 105.7(3) |
| V1—O11 | 1.960(5) | O12—V1—O11 | 99.3(3) | O4—V2—O13 | 98.8(4) |
| V1—N1B | 2.100(6) | O3—V1—O11 | 82.2(2) | O14—V2—O13 | 154.8(3) |
| V1—O1W | 2.351(7) | O15—V1—O11 | 154.8(3) | O10—V2—O13 | 83.5(2) |
| V4—O2 | 1.572(6) | O12—V1—N1B | 95.6(3) | O4—V2—N2A | 96.5(3) |
| V4—O3 | 1.797(6) | O3—V1—N1B | 154.8(2) | O14—V2—N2A | 86.4(3) |
| V4—O7 | 1.844(6) | O15—V1—N1B | 86.2(2) | O10—V2—N2A | 154.8(3) |
| V4—O9 | 1.948(6) | O11—V1—N1B | 76.8(2) | O13—V2—N2A | 77.1(3) |
| V4—N2B | 2.110(7) | O12—V1—O1W | 175.2(3) | O4—V2—O2W | 176.4(3) |
| V4—O11 | 2.413(5) | O3—V1—O1W | 83.1(2) | O14—V2—O2W | 78.7(3) |
| O15—V1—O1W | 79.3(3) | O10—V2—O2W | 80.9(3) | ||
| V1—V4 | 3.088(18) | O11—V1—O1W | 79.4(2) | O13—V2—O2W | 79.8(3) |
| N1B—V1—O1W | 79.6(2) | N2A—V2—O2W | 79.9(3) | ||
| V2—O4 | 1.584(8) | V4—O3—V1 | 117.5(3) | V3—O10—V2 | 117.9(3) |
| V2—O14 | 1.796(7) | V1—O11—V4 | 89.23(19) | V2—O13—V3 | 87.4(2) |
| V2—O10 | 1.811(6) | O2—V4—O3 | 103.9(3) | O1—V3—O10 | 103.7(3) |
| V2—O13 | 1.955(5) | O2—V4—O7 | 99.1(3) | O1—V3—O16 | 99.6(4) |
| V2—N2A | 2.105(7) | O3—V4—O7 | 99.6(2) | O10—V3—O16 | 99.1(3) |
| V2—O2W | 2.386(8) | O2—V4—O9 | 98.3(3) | O1—V3—O6 | 98.3(4) |
| V3—O1 | 1.581(7) | O3—V4—O9 | 91.5(3) | O10—V3—O6 | 92.8(3) |
| V3—O10 | 1.784(6) | O7—V4—O9 | 156.5(3) | O16—V3—O6 | 155.5(3) |
| V3—O16 | 1.833(8) | O2—V4—N2B | 104.2(3) | O1—V3—N1A | 104.5(3) |
| V3—O6 | 1.959(7) | O3—V4—N2B | 150.7(2) | O10—V3—N1A | 150.7(3) |
| V3—N1a | 2.096(7) | O7—V4—N2B | 84.3(3) | O16—V3—N1A | 83.7(3) |
| V3—O13 | 2.470(6) | O9—V4—N2B | 76.2(3) | O6—V3—N1A | 75.7(3) |
| O2—V4—O11 | 174.5(3) | O1—V3—O13 | 173.9(3) | ||
| V2—V3 | 3.080(2) | O3—V4—O11 | 70.6(2) | O10—V3—O13 | 70.3(2) |
| O7—V4—O11 | 82.6(2) | O16—V3—O13 | 82.8(3) | ||
| O9—V4—O11 | 81.6(2) | O6—V3—O13 | 81.2(2) | ||
| N2B—V4—O11 | 81.2(2) | N1a—V3—O1 | 81.3(3) |
Figure 4The molecular structure with the atom-labeling scheme of 2a. For clarity, hydrogen atoms have been excluded from the diagram.
Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles () for 2a.
| Bond | (Å) | Angle | (o) | Angle | (o) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O5—V1 | 2.379(12) | O6—V1—O7 a# | 102.3(5) | O2—V1—N1 | 84.4(5) |
a# = 1: −x, y, −z + 1.
Figure 5Absorption spectra (in the 230 ÷ 450 nm range) of 2 × 10−4 M 1a (A), 1b (B), 2a (C), and 2b (D) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4, 37 °C) recorded over 24 h.
Figure 6Fluorescence spectra of 2 × 10−6 M bovine serum albumin (BSA) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) in the presence of various concentrations (1 ÷ 25 × 10−6 M) of 1a (A), 1b (B), 2a (C), 2b (D). 0.025% Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, vehicle) was used as a negative control for oxidovanadium(V) complexes.
The Stern–Volmer constant (KSV) and collision quenching constant (Kq) of the Stern–Volmer equation for 1a, 1b, 2a, and 2b complexes.
| Compound | KSV (M−1) | Kq (M−1s−1) | Kq(2a)/Kq(1a) | Kq(2b)/Kq(1b) | Kq(1a)/Kq(1b) | Kq(2a)/Kq(2b) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.807 × 105 | 8.07 × 1012 | 2.12 | 4.14 | 1.34 | 0.690 |
|
| 0.601 × 105 | 6.01 × 1012 | ||||
|
| 1.718 × 105 | 1.718 × 1013 | ||||
|
| 2.489 × 105 | 2.489 × 1013 |
Figure 7The effect of 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b on α-amylase activity (A), HepG2 cell viability (B), total protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTP) enzymatic activity (C), insulin receptor (INS R) phosphorylation (D), and representative immunoblotting images of the phosphorylated form of INS R (pINS R), total form of INS R (tINS R-β), and β-actin (E). Acarbose was used as a positive control for α-amylase inhibition. Cisplatin was used as a positive control for cytotoxicity, Na3VVO4 was used as a control for PTP inhibition. As a negative control for VIVOSO4•3H2O, Na3VVO4 (VOSO4 and Na3VO4 for chart simplification), and insulin treatment, HepG2 cells exposed to the free-complete medium were used (depicted barely control). Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was used as a negative control for oxidovanadium(V) complexes and cisplatin treatment. The results were expressed as % of DMSO and were showed as mean ± SD and analyzed using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test; p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001 vs. DMSO and p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001 vs. Control, p < 0.001 vs. acarbose and p < 0.001 vs. VIVOSO4•3H2O.