| Literature DB >> 34067720 |
Yinglong Liu1, Wenpeng Hou1, Jie Jin2, Michael J Christensen3, Lijun Gu1, Chen Cheng1, Jianfeng Wang1.
Abstract
In the long-term evolutionary process,Entities:
Keywords: Epichloë gansuensis; grass; low P stress; metabolomics
Year: 2021 PMID: 34067720 PMCID: PMC8156409 DOI: 10.3390/jof7050390
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Figure 1The dry weight of leaves and roots in E− and E+ plants at 0.01 and 0.5 mM P. (a) The dry weight of leaves; (b) the dry weight of roots. *, ** and *** showed differences at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively.
Figure 2The content of C, N, and P of leaves (a,c,e) and roots (b,d,f) in E− and E+ plants at 0.01 and 0.5 mM P. *, ** and *** showed differences at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively.
Figure 3The content of K, Ca, Na, Mg, and Fe of leaves (a,c,e,g,i) and roots (b,d,f,h,j) in E− and E+ plants at 0.01 and 0.5 mM P. *, **, and *** showed differences at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively.
Figure 4The PCA displayed the metabolic profiles in E+ and E− leaves at 0.01 and 0.5 mM P (a). OPLS-DA displayed Epichloë gansuensis effects on the metabolism of Achnatherum inebrians leaves between LE+ and LE− at 0.01 mM P (b), between LE+ and LE− at 0.5 mM P (c); and dose-dependence of P effects on the metabolism of Achnatherum inebrians leaves between 0.01 and 0.5 mM P in LE+ (d), between 0.01 and 0.5 mM P in LE− (e). LE+: E+ leaves, LE−: E− leaves.
Figure 5The PCA displayed the metabolic profiles in E+ and E− roots at 0.01 and 0.5 mM P (a). OPLS-DA displayed Epichloë gansuensis effects on the metabolism of Achnatherum inebrians roots between RE+ and RE− at 0.01 mM P (b), between RE+ and RE− at 0.5 mM P (c); and dose-dependence of P effects on the metabolism of Achnatherum inebrians roots between 0.01 and 0.5 mM P in RE+ (d), between 0.01 and 0.5 mM P in RE− (e). RE+: E+ roots, RE−: E− roots.
Figure 6Venn diagram showed the significant difference of metabolites between LE+ and LE− at 0.01 and 0.5 mM P (a), between 0.01 and 0.5 mM P in LE+ and LE− (b).
Figure 7Venn diagram indicated the significant difference of metabolites between RE+ and RE− under 0.01 and 0.5 mM P (a), between 0.01 and 0.5 mM P in RE+ and RE− (b).
Figure 8The enrichment analysis of metabolic pathway in leaves. The metabolic pathways of a, b, and c mean between LE+ and LE− at 0.01 mM P (0.01 mM LE+ vs. LE−) (a); between 0.01 and 0.5 mM P in LE+ (LE+ 0.01 mM vs. 0.5 mM) (b); between 0.01 and 0.5 mM P in LE− (LE− 0.01 mM vs. 0.5 mM) (c), respectively.
Figure 9The enrichment analysis of metabolic pathway in roots. The metabolic pathways of a, b, c, and d mean between RE+ and RE− at 0.01 mM P (0.01 mM RE+ vs. RE−) (a); between RE+ and RE− at 0.5 mM P (0.01 mM RE+ vs. RE−) (b); between 0.01 and 0.5 mM P in RE+ (RE+ 0.01 mM vs. 0.5 mM) (c); between 0.01 and 0.5 mM P in RE− (RE− 0.01 mM vs. 0.5 mM) (d), respectively.
Figure 10Principal component analysis for Epichloë gansuensis-infection and the different P concentration treatment with the content of amino acids in leaves (a) and roots (c). The content of amino acids with heatmap in leaves (b) and roots (d).
Figure 11Phosphorus utilization efficiency of leaves (a), roots (b), and total (c) in E+ and E− Achnatherum inebrians at different P concentration. *, ** and *** showed differences at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively.