| Literature DB >> 34067555 |
Mónica Zuzarte1,2,3, Pedro M P Correia4, Jorge M Alves-Silva1,2,3,5, Maria J Gonçalves5,6, Carlos Cavaleiro5,6, Teresa Cruz5,7, Lígia Salgueiro5,6.
Abstract
Fungal infections remain a major health concern with aromatic plants and their metabolites standing out as promising antifungal agents. The present study aims to assess, for the first time, the antifungal and anti-inflammatory potential of Bupleurum subsp. paniculatum (Brot.) H.Wolff essential oil from Portugal. The oil obtained by hydrodistillation and characterized by GC-MS, showed high amounts of monoterpene hydrocarbons, namely α-pinene (29.0-36.0%), β-pinene (26.1-30.7%) and limonene (10.5-13.5%). The antifungal potential was assessed, according to CLSI guidelines, against several clinical and collection strains. The essential oil showed a broad fungicidal effect being more potent against Cryptococcus neoformans and dermatophytes. Moreover, a significant germ tube inhibition was observed in Candida albicans as well as a disruption of mature biofilms, thus pointing out an effect of the oil against relevant virulent factors. Furthermore, fungal ultrastructural modifications were detected through transmission electron microscopy, highlighting the nefarious effect of the oil. Of relevance, the oil also evidenced anti-inflammatory activity through nitric oxide inhibition in macrophages activated with lipopolysaccharide. In addition, the essential oil's bioactive concentrations did not present toxicity towards macrophages. Overall, the present study confirmed the bioactive potential of B. rigidum subsp. paniculatum essential oil, thus paving the way for the development of effective drugs presenting concomitantly antifungal and anti-inflammatory properties.Entities:
Keywords: anti-inflammatory; antifungal; biofilm; germ tube
Year: 2021 PMID: 34067555 PMCID: PMC8156192 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10050592
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6382
Chemical composition of Portuguese Bupleurum rigidum subsp. paniculatum essential oil.
| Compound * | RI | RI | Coimbra | Fátima |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| α-Thujene | 922 | 1029 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| α-Pinene | 930 | 1030 | 36.0 | 29.0 |
| Camphene | 943 | 1077 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Fenchene | 943 | 1067 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Sabinene | 964 | 1128 | 2.0 | 2.6 |
| β-Pinene | 970 | 1118 | 26.1 | 30.7 |
| Myrcene | 981 | 1160 | 1.8 | 10.0 |
| α-Phellandrene | 997 | 1171 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| α-Terpinene | 1006 | 1183 | t | t |
| 1009 | 1271 | 0.2 | t | |
| Limonene | 1021 | 1204 | 10.5 | 13.5 |
| β-Phellandrene | 1021 | 1214 | 9.4 | 4.5 |
| Z-β-Ocimene | 1025 | 1235 | 4.1 | 1.0 |
| 1035 | 1253 | 5.1 | 2.0 | |
| γ-Terpinene | 1046 | 1249 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Terpinolene | 1076 | 1288 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
|
| 96.6 | 94.4 | ||
| Linalool | 1082 | 1543 | t | t |
| α-Pinene-xide | 1077 | 1370 | t | t |
| 1118 | 1370 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |
| Terpinene-4-ol | 1159 | 1595 | 0.1 | t |
| Myrtenal | 1176 | 1786 | 0.1 | t |
| α-Terpineol | 1168 | 1692 | t | t |
| Bornyl acetate | 1266 | 1578 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
|
| 0.5 | 0.3 | ||
| α-Copaene | 1364 | 1487 | 0.1 | t |
| β-Cubebene | 1380 | 1538 | t | t |
| 1408 | 1590 | 0.2 | 0.1 | |
| γ-Elemene | 1417 | 2136 | t | t |
| α-Humulene | 1442 | 1665 | t | t |
| Germacrene-D | 1466 | 1699 | 1.7 | 0.5 |
| Bicyclogermacrene | 1478 | 1727 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| δ-Cadinene | 1508 | 1751 | 0,1 | t |
|
| 2.4 | 0.8 | ||
| Spathulenol | 1551 | 2112 | t | t |
| Caryophyllene oxide | 1557 | 1968 | t | t |
|
| 0.1 | 0.1 | ||
|
| 99.6 | 95.6 |
* Compounds listed in order of elution in the SPB-1 column; t < 0.05%. a RI SPB 1: GC retention indices relative to C9-C23 n-alkanes on the SPB-1 column. b RI SW 10: GC retention indices relative to C9-C23 n-alkanes on the Supelcowax-10 column.
Antifungal activity of Bupleurum rigidum subsp. paniculatum essential oil.
| Strains | Essential Oil | Fluconazole | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC | MLC | MIC | MLC | |
| 576 | 576 | 1 | >128 | |
| 1125 | 1125 | 4 | >128 | |
| 288 | 288 | 64 | 64–128 | |
| 288 | 288 | 8 | 8 | |
| 576 | 576 | 1 | 1–2 | |
| 72 | 144 | 16 | 128 | |
| 288 | 288 | 16–32 | 32–64 | |
| 288 | 288 | 128 | ≥128 | |
| 72 | 72 | 16 | 64 | |
| 288 | 288 | 128 | >128 | |
| 144 | 144 | 128 | 128 | |
| 288 | 288 | 128 | >128 | |
| 144 | 144 | 16 | 16 | |
| 288 | 1125 | n.t | n.t | |
| 576 | 576 | n.t | n.t | |
| 576 | 576 | n.t | n.t | |
MIC—minimal inhibitory concentration and MLC—minimal lethal concentration determined by a macrodilution method and expressed as µg/mL; n.t—not tested.
Figure 1Filamentation percentage of Candida albicans ATCC 10231 treated with different concentrations of Bupleurum rigidum subp. paniculatum essential oil (a) or treated with fluconazole (b). One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison Test, ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001, compared to control.
Figure 2Effect of Bupleurum rigidum subp. paniculatum essential oil (a) and fluoconazole (b) on Candida albicans ATCC 10231 biofilm biomass and viability. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test (performed in separate on each feature), * p < 0.05, compared to biofilm mass control; # p < 0.05 and ## p < 0.01, compared to biofilm viability control; arrows indicate MIC value.
Figure 3Transmission electron microscopic observations of Candida albicans in the presence of DMSO (a,b) or treated with of 72 µg/mL of Bupleurum rigidum subsp. paniculatum essential oil (c–h). Arrow points to fragments from the cell wall; c—cell wall.
Figure 4Transmission electron microscopic observations of Trichophyton rubrum in the presence of DMSO (a,b) or treated with of 576 µg/mL of Bupleurum rigidum subsp. paniculatum essential oil (c–h). Arrow points to fragments from the cell wall; * shows an autophagic structure; c—cell wall, v—vacuoles.
Figure 5Effect of Bupleurum rigidum subp. paniculatum essential oil on NO production (a) and cell viability (b). One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison Test, ### p < 0.001, compared to control; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001, compared to LPS. EO—essential oil.