Igor A Schepetkin1, Mark B Plotnikov2, Andrei I Khlebnikov3,4, Tatiana M Plotnikova5, Mark T Quinn1. 1. Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA. 2. Goldberg Research Institute of Pharmacology and Regenerative Medicine, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 634028 Tomsk, Russia. 3. Kizhner Research Center, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia. 4. Scientific Research Institute of Biological Medicine, Altai State University, 656049 Barnaul, Russia. 5. Department of Pharmacology, Siberian State Medical University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.
Abstract
Oximes have been studied for decades because of their significant roles as acetylcholinesterase reactivators. Over the last twenty years, a large number of oximes have been reported with useful pharmaceutical properties, including compounds with antibacterial, anticancer, anti-arthritis, and anti-stroke activities. Many oximes are kinase inhibitors and have been shown to inhibit over 40 different kinases, including AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK), serine/threonine kinases glycogen synthase kinase 3 α/β (GSK-3α/β), Aurora A, B-Raf, Chk1, death-associated protein-kinase-related 2 (DRAK2), phosphorylase kinase (PhK), serum and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase (SGK), Janus tyrosine kinase (JAK), and multiple receptor and non-receptor tyrosine kinases. Some oximes are inhibitors of lipoxygenase 5, human neutrophil elastase, and proteinase 3. The oxime group contains two H-bond acceptors (nitrogen and oxygen atoms) and one H-bond donor (OH group), versus only one H-bond acceptor present in carbonyl groups. This feature, together with the high polarity of oxime groups, may lead to a significantly different mode of interaction with receptor binding sites compared to corresponding carbonyl compounds, despite small changes in the total size and shape of the compound. In addition, oximes can generate nitric oxide. This review is focused on oximes as kinase inhibitors with anticancer and anti-inflammatory activities. Oximes with non-kinase targets or mechanisms of anti-inflammatory activity are also discussed.
Oximes have been studied for decades because of their significant roles as acetylcholinesterase reactivators. Over the last twenty years, a large number of n class="Chemical">oximes have been reported with useful pharmaceutical properties, including compounds with antibacterial, anticancer, anti-arthritis, and anti-stroke activities. Many oximes are kinase inhibitors and have been shown to inhibit over 40 different kinases, including AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK), serine/threonine kinases glycogen synthase kinase 3 α/β (GSK-3α/β), Aurora A, B-Raf, Chk1, death-associated protein-kinase-related 2 (DRAK2), phosphorylase kinase (PhK), serum and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase (SGK), Janus tyrosine kinase (JAK), and multiple receptor and non-receptor tyrosine kinases. Some oximes are inhibitors of lipoxygenase 5, humanneutrophil elastase, and proteinase 3. The oxime group contains two H-bond acceptors (nitrogen and oxygen atoms) and one H-bond donor (OH group), versus only one H-bond acceptor present in carbonyl groups. This feature, together with the high polarity of oxime groups, may lead to a significantly different mode of interaction with receptor binding sites compared to corresponding carbonyl compounds, despite small changes in the total size and shape of the compound. In addition, oximes can generate nitric oxide. This review is focused on oximes as kinase inhibitors with anticancer and anti-inflammatory activities. Oximes with non-kinase targets or mechanisms of anti-inflammatory activity are also discussed.
Authors: Igor A Schepetkin; Liliya N Kirpotina; Andrei I Khlebnikov; Tracey S Hanks; Irina Kochetkova; David W Pascual; Mark A Jutila; Mark T Quinn Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2012-03-20 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Andrew J Franjesevic; Sydney B Sillart; Jeremy M Beck; Shubham Vyas; Christopher S Callam; Christopher M Hadad Journal: Chemistry Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 5.236
Authors: P X Franklin; Ajay D Pillai; Parendu D Rathod; Swapnil Yerande; Manish Nivsarkar; Harish Padh; Kamala K Vasu; V Sudarsanam Journal: Eur J Med Chem Date: 2007-03-01 Impact factor: 6.514
Authors: Gordon Munro; Jeppe K Christensen; Helle K Erichsen; Tino Dyhring; Joachim Demnitz; Eva Dam; Philip K Ahring Journal: CNS Neurosci Ther Date: 2015-12-10 Impact factor: 5.243
Authors: Stefan Liebner; Monica Corada; Thorsten Bangsow; Jane Babbage; Andrea Taddei; Cathrin J Czupalla; Marco Reis; Angelina Felici; Hartwig Wolburg; Marcus Fruttiger; Makoto M Taketo; Harald von Melchner; Karl Heinz Plate; Holger Gerhardt; Elisabetta Dejana Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2008-10-27 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: Tina Blazevic; Anja M Schaible; Katharina Weinhäupl; Daniel Schachner; Felix Nikels; Christina Weinigel; Dagmar Barz; Atanas G Atanasov; Carlo Pergola; Oliver Werz; Verena M Dirsch; Elke H Heiss Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2013-12-23 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Igor A Schepetkin; Anastasia R Kovrizhina; Ksenia S Stankevich; Andrei I Khlebnikov; Liliya N Kirpotina; Mark T Quinn; Matthew J Cook Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2022-09-12 Impact factor: 5.988
Authors: Igor A Schepetkin; Gulmira Özek; Temel Özek; Liliya N Kirpotina; Andrei I Khlebnikov; Mark T Quinn Journal: Molecules Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 4.411