| Literature DB >> 34067118 |
Jiaqing Guo1, Aikun Liu1, Yutian Zeng1, Haojie Cai1, Shuai Ye1, Hao Li1, Wei Yan1, Feifan Zhou1, Jun Song1, Junle Qu1,2.
Abstract
The use ofEntities:
Keywords: carbon dots; ions detection; ratiometric fluorescence
Year: 2021 PMID: 34067118 PMCID: PMC8150300 DOI: 10.3390/nano11051232
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1(a) TEM image, (b) FT–IR spectrum, and (c) XPS spectrum of NCDs. (d) Corresponding high-resolution C1s spectra, (e) O1s spectra, and (f) N1s spectra of NCDs. (g) Excitation–emission color 3D map of NCDs. (h) Excitation (black curve) and fluorescence (FL) spectra (red curve) of NCDs (311 nm excitation). (i) Absorption (blue curve), excitation (black curve), and fluorescence (FL) spectra (red curve) of NCDs (497 nm excitation).
Figure 2(a) Normalized FI of NCDs with different concentrations of NaCl. (b) Normalized FI of NCDs at different durations under UV light irradiation. Normalized FI of NCDs (c) with Cu2+ and (d) with ClO− at different response times. Normalized FI of NCDs under different pH values (e) with or without Cu2+ and (f) with or without ClO−.
Figure 3(a) Normalized FI of NCDs after the addition of various ions. (b) Normalized FI of ClO−-NCDs after the addition of various ions. (c) Normalized FI of NCDs after the addition of various ions. (d) Normalized FI of Cu2+-NCDs after the addition of various ions.
Figure 4FI of the NCDs excited by (a) 311 nm radiation and (b) 497 nm radiation after adding different ClO− concentrations (from top to bottom: 0–75 μM). (c) Relationship between the F454 nm/F515 nm ratio versus the ClO- concentrations (0–75 μM). (d) Decay PL spectra of the NCDs quenched by ClO− at different concentrations.
Figure 5FI of the NCDs excited by (a) 497 nm radiation and (b) 311 nm radiation after the addition of different Cu2+ concentrations (from top to bottom: 0–90 μM). (c) Relationship between the F515nm/F454 nm ratio versus the Cu2+ concentrations (0–90 μM). (d) Decay PL spectra of the NCDs quenched by Cu2+ at different concentrations.
Determination of ClO− in tap water samples (n = 3).
| Sample | Found (μM) | Added (μM) | Total Found (μM) | Recovery (%) | RSD ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tap water 1 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 1.56 | 96.5 | 2.48 |
| 2.00 | 2.59 | 101.7 | 2.21 | ||
| 3.00 | 3.62 | 106.9 | 3.63 | ||
| Tap water 2 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 1.89 | 101.1 | 2.89 |
| 2.00 | 2.88 | 100.0 | 1.95 | ||
| 3.00 | 3.93 | 105.7 | 3.42 |
Determination of Cu2+ in tap water samples (n = 3).
| Sample | Found (μM) | Added (μM) | Total Found (μM) | Recovery (%) | RSD ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tap water 1 | No Found | 1.00 | 0.99 | 99.0 | 2.23 |
| 2.00 | 2.01 | 100.5 | 1.65 | ||
| 3.00 | 2.95 | 98.3 | 1.99 | ||
| Tap water 2 | No Found | 1.00 | 1.04 | 104.0 | 2.96 |
| 2.00 | 1.99 | 99.5 | 2.37 | ||
| 3.00 | 2.98 | 99.3 | 2.18 |