| Literature DB >> 34067053 |
Yubin Zhang1, Jun Du1, Huafeng Wang1, Hua Li1, Xiaoyun Zhao1.
Abstract
A transient three-dimensional (3D) numerical model was established to illustrate the heat transfer, fluid flow and particle migration behaviors in the molten pool during TIG-assisted droplet deposition manufacturing (DDM) of SiC particle-reinforced aluminum matrix composites (AMCs). The effect of temperature-dependent physical properties and the interaction between the SiC reinforcement and the liquid metal matrix were considered. A double-ellipsoidal volumetric heat source model was adopted to simulate the energy interactions between the pulse square-wave variable polarity TIG welding arc and the moving substrate. Free surface fluctuations of molten pool due to arc force and sequential droplet impact are calculated with volume of fluid (VOF) method in a fixed Eulerian structured mesh. The numerical model, capable of capturing the impact, simultaneous spread, and phase change of the droplets as well as the motion trajectory and terminate distribution state of the reinforcement particles, is key tool to understand the formation mechanism of the TIG-assisted DDM of SiC particle-reinforced AMCs. The numerical model was validated by the metallographic observations, and the calculated particle distribution and solidification morphology of deposited layer agree well with the experimental measurements.Entities:
Keywords: SiC particle-reinforced aluminum matrix composites; droplet deposition manufacturing; molten pool; particle migration behaviors
Year: 2021 PMID: 34067053 PMCID: PMC8124208 DOI: 10.3390/ma14092430
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the TIG-assisted DDM process of particulate reinforced AMCs.
The relevant thermophysical properties of SiC particle and ZL101 aluminum alloy.
| Thermal Properties | Value |
|---|---|
| Solid density of ZL101 | |
| Liquid density of ZL101 | |
| Solidus temperature | |
| Liquidus temperature | |
| Latent heat of fusion | |
| Latent heat of evaporation | |
| Thermal conductivity of solid phase | |
| Thermal conductivity of liquid phase | |
| Specific heat capacity of solid phase | |
| Specific heat capacity of liquid phase | |
| Dynamic viscosity | |
| Surface tension | |
| Temperature coefficient of surface tension | |
| Thermal expansion coefficient | |
| Particle density | |
| Particle diameter | |
| Particle fraction | |
| Thermal conductivity of particle | |
| Specific heat capacity of particle | |
| Liquidus temperature of particle | |
| Latent heat of fusion of particle | |
| Ambient temperature | |
| Magnetic permeability | |
| Convection heat transfer coefficient | |
| Radiation emissivity | |
| Stefan-Boltzmann constant | σ = 5.67 × 108 (W·m−2·K−4) |
Initial conditions and the process parameters of TIG-assisted DDM.
| Process Parameters | Value |
|---|---|
| EP ratio | 50 (%) |
| Current cycle | |
| Arc current in EN phase | |
| Arc current in EP stage | |
| Arc voltage at EN stage | |
| Arc voltage at EP stage | |
| Arc heat absorption | |
| Substrate moving speed | |
| Torch angle | |
| Droplet temperature | |
| Droplet diameter | |
| Droplet frequency | |
| Impact velocity of droplets |
Figure 2Top surface morphology and cross-section of a single-track deposited layer: (a,c) experimental results, (b,d) simulated results.
Figure 3SEM microstructures of ZL101 Al matrix composites in the specified region (Figure 2c): (a) AMC-SiC; (b) interface between SiC particles and the Al alloy matrix; (c) EDS line scanning of the SiC particle and (d) EDS spectrums corresponding to the locations in (c).
Comparison of calculated and experimental feature sizes of a single-track deposited layer.
| Simulation | Experiment | Error | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deposition width | 10.6 mm | 11.2 ± 0.3 mm | 5.4% |
| Deposition height | 3.1 mm | 3.3 ± 0.2 mm | 6.1% |
| Depth of penetration | 1.2 mm | 1.1 ± 0.1 mm | 9.1% |
Figure 4Solid fraction distribution and surface deformation of a single-track deposited layer in the early stage of TIG-assisted DDM.
Figure 5Distribution position of SiC particle-reinforced phase in the deposited layer.
Figure 6Temperature evolution at specified points (P1, P2, P3 and P4) during one deposition period.