| Literature DB >> 34066958 |
Joanna Moro1, Nadezda Khodorova1, Daniel Tomé1, Claire Gaudichon1, Catherine Tardivel2, Thierry Berton2, Jean-Charles Martin2, Dalila Azzout-Marniche1, Delphine Jouan-Rimbaud Bouveresse1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Dietary intakes must cover protein and essential amino acid (EAA) requirements. For this purpose, different methods have been developed such as the nitrogen balance method, factorial method, or AA tracer studies. However, these methods are either invasive or imprecise, and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO, 2013) recommends new methods and, in particular, metabolomics. The aim of this study is to determine total protein/EAA requirement in the plasma and urine of growing rats.Entities:
Keywords: amino acid; biomarkers; deficiency; metabolomics; protein; requirement
Year: 2021 PMID: 34066958 PMCID: PMC8148556 DOI: 10.3390/nu13051567
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Macronutrient composition of the diets. Diets were produced by the “Sciences de l’Animal et de l’Aliment de Jouy (SAAJ), INRAE, Jouy en Josas, France (P stands for Protein).
| P3 | P5 | P8 | P12 | P15 | P20 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight content (g/kg) | ||||||
| Milk proteins | 29 | 48 | 77 | 116 | 145 | 193.5 |
| Corn Starch | 717.9 | 701.5 | 676.6 | 643.1 | 618.1 | 576.4 |
| Sucrose | 115.8 | 113.2 | 109.1 | 103.6 | 99.6 | 92.8 |
| Soy Oil | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 |
| Minerals | 35 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 35 |
| Vitamins | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Cellulose | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Choline | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
| Energy content (%) | ||||||
| Protein | 3 | 5 | 8 | 12 | 15 | 20 |
| Carbohydrate | 86.6 | 84.6 | 81.6 | 77.6 | 74.6 | 69.5 |
| Fat | 9.3 | 9.3 | 9.3 | 9.3 | 9.3 | 9.3 |
| Energy density (kJ/g) | 14.54 | 14.55 | 14.55 | 14.56 | 14.56 | 14.57 |
Figure 1Schematic representation of ICDA. X is the matrix of mass spectra and Y is the group information matrix (there are as many columns as groups, and for each group, there is a 0 value if the corresponding sample does not belong to this group, and a 1 if it does). Sc is the proportion matrix, while SigX and SigY correspond to the parts of the signal matrix related to the mass spectra and to the group membership, respectively; Sc * is the proportion matrix obtained after removing SigY from the calculations.
Figure 2PLS Analysis for the data obtained by LC-MS characterizing the discrimination of the predefined groups to discriminate protein content diet based on IC1 and IC2 in urine (A), portal vein (B), and vena cava (C).
Discriminant urinary metabolites obtained with PLS and ICDA. Data are presented as changes from P3 to P20: ↑ represents an increase and ↓ a decrease. When the changes were not linear among the protein levels, the details are indicated. When no sign was written, the metabolite was not discriminant. For more details, see Figures S1 and S2.
| Urinary Discriminant Metabolites | Effect of Dietary Protein Content from P3 to P20 | |
|---|---|---|
| PLS | ICDA | |
| 3-methyl-2-oxovalerate | ↓ | ↓ |
| 4-methyl-2-oxovalerate | ↓ | ↓ |
| oxovaleric acid | ↓ | ↓ |
| azelate | ↓ | ↓ |
| creatine | ↓ | ↓ |
| ↓ | ↓ | |
| ↓ | ↓ | |
| galactose | ↓ | ↓ |
| phosphoric acid | ↓ | ↓ |
| pyridoxine | ↓ | ↓ |
| raffinose | ↓ | ↓ |
| succinic acid | ↓ | ↓ |
| pantothenate | ↓ P5–P20 | ↓ |
| alpha | ↓ | |
| galactitol | ↓ | |
| ↓ | ||
| ↓ | ||
| proline-leucine | ↓ | |
| sucrose | ↓ | |
| anthranilate | ↑ | ↑ |
| cadaverine | ↑ | ↑ |
| homogentisic acid | ↑ | ↑ |
| isovaleroylglycine | ↑ | ↑ |
| kynurenic acid | ↑ | ↑ |
| ↑ | ↑ | |
| ↑ | ↑ | |
| pipecolate | ↑ | ↑ |
| uracil | ↑ | ↑ |
| xanthurenate | ↑ | ↑ |
| indoxyl sulfate | ↑ | ↑ |
| putrescine | ↑ | ↑ |
| 4-pyridoxate, | ↑ | |
| ↑ | ||
| ↑ | ||
| spermidine, | ↑ | |
| tyramine | ↓P3–P5↑P8–P12↓P15P20 | |
Discriminant plasma metabolites obtained with PLS and ICDA in the portal vein (PV) and vena cava (VC). Data are presented as changes from P3 to P20: ↑ represents an increase and ↓ a decrease. When the changes were not linear among the protein levels, the details are indicated. When no sign was written, the metabolite was not discriminant. For more details, see Figures S2 and S3.
| Discriminant Plasma Metabolites | PLS | ICDA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PV | VC | PV | VC | |
| betaine | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ |
| fucose | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ |
| lysoPC (18:0) | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ |
| ↓ | ↓ | |||
| ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | |
| ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | |
| malate | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | |
| ↓ | ↓ | |||
| 2-hydroxyisocaproic acid | ↓ | ↓ | ||
| ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ||
| pyroglutamate | ↓ | |||
| ↓ | ↓ | |||
| citrulline | ↓ | |||
| ↓ | ||||
| ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | |
| ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | |
| ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | |
| ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | |
| ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | |
| taurocholic acid, | ↑ | ↑ | ||
| tryptophan | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | |
| 3-isopropylmalic acid | ↑ | |||
| ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ||
| indoxyl sulfate | ↑ | |||
| ↑ | ||||
| ↑ | ||||
| ↑ | ||||
Figure 3Independent components-discriminate analysis proportions plot calculated after source signal extraction for Table 1. IC2 in urine (A), portal vein (B), and vena cava (C).