| Literature DB >> 34066954 |
Javier Rodríguez-Cobos1, David Viñal2, Carmen Poves3, María J Fernández-Aceñero4, Héctor Peinado5, Daniel Pastor-Morate6, Mª Isabel Prieto6, Rodrigo Barderas7, Nuria Rodríguez-Salas2, Gemma Domínguez1.
Abstract
The early diagnosis of colorectal cancer is a key factor in the overall survival of the patients. The actual screening programs include different approaches with significant limitations such as unspecificity, high invasiveness, and detection at late stages of the disease. The specific content of extracellular vesicles derived from malignant cells may represent a non-invasive technique for the early detection of colorectal cancer. Here, we studied the mRNA levels of ΔNp73, TAp73, and Δ133p53 in plasma-derived extracellular vesicles from healthy subjects (n = 29), individuals with premalignant lesions (n = 49), and colorectal cancer patients (n = 42). Extracellular vesicles' ΔNp73 levels were already significantly high in subjects with premalignant lesions. Δ133p53 levels were statistically increased in colorectal cancer patients compared to the other two groups and were associated with patients' survival. Remarkably, TAp73 mRNA was not detected in any of the individuals. The evaluation of ΔNp73, Δ133p53 and CEA sensitivity, specificity and AUC values supports ΔNp73 as a better early diagnosis biomarker and CEA as the best to identify advanced stages. Thus, low levels of CEA and a high content of ΔNp73 may identify in screening programs those individuals at higher risk of presenting a premalignant lesion. In addition, Δ133p53 emerges as a potential prognosis biomarker in colorectal cancer.Entities:
Keywords: TAp73; biomarkers; colorectal cancer; early diagnosis; extracellular vesicles; liquid biopsy; premalignant lesions; screening programs; Δ133p53; ΔNp73
Year: 2021 PMID: 34066954 PMCID: PMC8124369 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13092240
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Clinical parameters of the subjects included in the study.
| Parameters | Healthy Individuals | Subjects with PL | CRC Patients |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 29 | 49 | 42 |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 10 (34.48%) | 24 (48.98%) | 22 (52.38%) |
| Female | 19 (65.52%) | 25 (51.02%) | 20 (47.62%) |
| Age (years) | |||
| Median, range | 59 (42–79) | 62 (31–81) | 71 (49–89) |
| CEA (ng/mL) | |||
| Median, range | 0.0 (0.0–81.9) | 0.0 (0.0–135.2) | 3.1 (0.5–94.9) |
| Tumor stage | |||
| I | 5 (11.905%) | ||
| II | 9 (21.43%) | ||
| III | 23 (54.76%) | ||
| IV | 5 (11.905%) | ||
| Tumor location | |||
| Right colon | 14 (33.33%) | ||
| Left colon | 17 (40.48%) | ||
| Rectum | 11 (26.19%) | ||
| DFS ( | |||
| Median, CI | NR | ||
| 3 years DFS (95%, CI) | 75% (61–89) | ||
| OS | |||
| Median, CI | NR | ||
| 3 years OS (95%, CI) | 69% (55–83) | ||
n, number of subjects; DFS, Disease-free survival; OS, Overall survival; NR, Not Reached.
Figure 1Scheme of the experimental workflow.
Figure 2EVs’ mRNA levels of (A) ΔNp73 and (B) Δ133p53 in the three groups of individuals. Box and whisker plot displaying the qPCR data related to the EVs’ concentration. Statistical significance * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3Determination of the ΔNp73 EV mRNA content as discriminating plasma biomarker between healthy and PL group (A), healthy and CRC patients (B) and healthy versus PL+CRC subjects (C) was carried out through ROC curves calculating AUC, its specificity (spec) and sensitivity (sens).
Figure 4Determination of the Δ133p53 EV mRNA content as discriminating plasma biomarker between healthy and CRC patients (A), PL individuals and CRC patients (B) and healthy + PL subjects and CRC patients (C) was carried out through ROC curves calculating AUC, its specificity (spec) and sensitivity (sens).
Figure 5Determination of the diagnostic potential of CEA levels in plasma to discriminate healthy subjects versus subjects with PL (A), healthy subjects versus patients with CRC (B), subjects with PL versus patients with CRC (C), healthy + PL subjects versus patients with CRC (D), and healthy subjects versus PL subjects + patients with CRC (E) carried out through ROC curves calculating AUC, its specificity (spec) and sensitivity (sens).
Figure 6ΔNp73 mRNA contained in the EVs according to tumoral stage. Box and whisker plot displaying the qPCR data related to the EVs’ concentration. Statistical significance, * p < 0.05.
Figure 7Kaplan–Meier estimates of DFS and OS. Influence of EVs’ content of ΔNp73 on DFS (A) and OS (B), and EVs’ content of Δ133p53 on DFS (C) and (D) on OS. Tick marks indicate censored data. Low and high levels of ΔNp73 and Δ133p53 were classified according to the selected cut-offs.
Correlations between the seroreactivity of different variants of the p53 family (p53, p73, ΔNp73α, and ΔNp73β) and ΔNp73 and Δ133p53 EV content. The Spearman correlation coefficient (r) is shown in the table.
| Seroreactiviy vs. EVs Content | Healthy | PL | CRC |
|---|---|---|---|
| p53 autoantibodies vs. EVs Δ133p53 | 0.194 | −0.303 | −0.339 |
| p73 autoantibodies vs. EVs ΔNp73 | −0.110 | 0.127 | 0.018 |
| ΔNp73α autoantibodies vs. EVs ΔNp73 | −0.064 | 0.050 | −0.548 |
| ΔNp73β autoantibodies vs. EVs ΔNp73 | −0.064 | 0.018 | −0.305 |
PL, premalignant lesions; CRC, colorectal cancer.