| Literature DB >> 34066661 |
Jesuarockiam Naveen1, Mohammad Jawaid2, Kheng Lim Goh3,4, Degalhal Mallikarjuna Reddy1, Chandrasekar Muthukumar5, Tamil Moli Loganathan6, Koduri Naga Ganapathy Lakshmi Reshwanth1.
Abstract
The development of armour systems with higher ballistic resistance and light weight has gained considerable attention as an increasing number of countries are recognising the need to build up advanced self-defence system to deter potential military conflicts and threats. Graphene is a two dimensional one-atom thick nanomaterial which possesses excellent tensile strength (130 GPa) and specific penetration energy (10 times higher than steel). It is also lightweight, tough and stiff and is expected to replace the current aramid fibre-based polymer composites. Currently, insights derived from the study of the nacre (natural armour system) are finding applications on the development of artificial nacre structures using graphene-based materials that can achieve high toughness and energy dissipation. The aim of this review is to discuss the potential of graphene-based nanomaterials with regard to the penetration energy, toughness and ballistic limit for personal body armour applications. This review addresses the cutting-edge research in the ballistic performance of graphene-based materials through theoretical, experimentation as well as simulations. The influence of fabrication techniques and interfacial interactions of graphene-based bioinspired polymer composites for ballistic application are also discussed. This review also covers the artificial nacre which is shown to exhibit superior mechanical and toughness behaviours.Entities:
Keywords: artificial nacre; body armour; graphene; specific penetration energy; tensile strength; toughness
Year: 2021 PMID: 34066661 PMCID: PMC8151629 DOI: 10.3390/nano11051239
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Penetration process (i) initial stage; (ii) cone formation stage; (iii) fracture stage; and (iv) post penetration stage, MLG: Multilayer graphene, Vi (impact speed), Vc (radial speed) Vr (residual speed) Reprinted with permission from AAAS [24]. Copyright 2014 AAAS.
Comparison of ballistic limit velocity ratio and strain energy density. Reprinted with permission from [22]. Copyright 2015 Elsevier.
| Material | Strain Energy Density (J/g) | V50/V50 Kevlar |
|---|---|---|
| Kevlar129 | 38.7 | 1.00 |
| Dyneema SK-76 | 48.1 | 1.13 |
| Carbon fibre | 26.8 | 0.99 |
| CNT yarn | 121 | 1.97 |
| Aluminium alloy5083 | 9.5 | 0.76 |
| Titanium alloyTi-6-4 | 29.4 | 1.10 |
| Graphene | 8350 | 11.6 |
V50—ballistic limit.
Figure 2Snap shots during impact simulation (a) with polyethylene, (b) without polyethylene [34].
Figure 3Layering sequence of (a) natural nacre vs (b) artificial nacre.
Figure 4Preparation of the laminated cellulose nanocrystals/graphene oxide nanomembranes. Reproduced with permission from [53]. Copyright 2015 John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 5Fabrication of artificial nacre using graphene oxide /dopolyamine (DA). Reproduced with permission from [54]. Further permissions related to the material excerpted should be directed to the ACS. Copyright 2014 ACS.
Figure 6Preparation of graphene oxide film. Reproduced with permission from [64]. Copyright 2014 John Wiley and Sons.
Merits and limitations of nacre inspired manufacturing technologies.
| Sl.No | Fabrication Technique | Merits | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Layer by layer | Layered structure can be controlled precisely | Time consuming process. |
| 2. | Evaporation | The evaporation procedure is quiet easy. | Precise control of the structure is difficult |
| 3. | Filtration | Simple operating procedure. | Scaling up is a tedious and time consuming process |
| 4. | Freeze casting | Suitable to fabricate bulk materials | Consumes more energy |
| 5. | Hydrogel casting | Economical technique. | Controlling the layered structure is difficult. |
| 6. | Electrophoretic deposition | Precise control of the structure | Fabrication of thick film is very difficult. |
Figure 7Conventional and bio-inspired nano composite structure.
Properties of graphene and nacre-inspired graphene-based composites for armour applications.
| Material | Fabrication Techniques | Energy Absorption | Ballistic Limit | Stress | Toughness | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type of Graphene | Polymer | ||||||
| Multilayer graphene | - | Overlapping | 3 MJ | - | 50 MPa | 7 × 103 MJ/m3 | [ |
| Multilayer graphene | Poly vinyl alcohol | liquid exfoliation | - | 15 m/s | 50 MPa | - | [ |
| Graphene oxide paper | - | Flow-directed assembly of individual graphene oxide sheets | - | - | 130 MPa | - | [ |
| Graphene oxide | Poly Vinyl alcohol or hydrophobic poly(methyl methacrylate) | Filtration | - | - | 102.9 MPa | - | [ |
| Graphene oxide | Water soluble | Gel film Transformation (GFT) | - | - | 200 MPa | 8.98 ± 0.73 MJ/m3 | [ |
| Graphene oxide | Poly vinyl alcohol | Layer by Layer | - | - | 143 ± 13 MPa | 9.2 ± 2.7 MJ/m3 | [ |
| Graphene oxide | Poly vinyl alcohol | Evaporation | - | - | 240.4 ± 30.8 MPa | 2.0 ± 0.5 MJ/m3 | [ |
| Graphene oxide | Al2O3 platelets and chitosan | Hydrogen bonding | - | - | 152 MPa | 75 MJ/m3 | [ |
| Graphene | Poly vinyl alcohol | Layer-by-Layer | - | - | 219 ± 19 MPa | - | [ |
| Bioinspired Graphene | Bio polymer | Hydrogel Casting | - | - | 382 MPa | 7.5 MJ/m3 | [ |
| Layer-by-Layer | - | - | 300 MPa | 75 MJ/m3 | |||
| Filtration | - | - | 133 MPa | - | |||
| Evaporation | - | - | - | - | |||
| Graphene oxide | Fibre-based biopolymers and polymer nano composites. | Drop-casting or vacuum-assisted filtration | - | - | 400 MPa | 3.9 ± 0.5 MJ/m3 | [ |
| Graphene oxide | Poly vinyl alcohol | Layer by Layer | 91.2 ± 1.6 MPa | 1.4 ± 0.1 MJ/m3 | [ | ||
| Multilayered Graphene | Polypeptide | Filtration | 6000 J | - | 351 MPa | - | [ |
| Graphene oxide | Poly acrylic acid | Vacuum-assisted filtration | - | - | 179.03 ± 4.55 MPa (Depends on humidity varies) | 6.04 ± 0.49 MJ/m3 (Depends on humidity varies) | [ |
| Graphene oxide | Bio inspired nano composite | Evaporation | - | - | 374.1 ± 22.8 MPa | 9.2 ± 0.8 MJ/m3 | [ |
| Graphene oxide | Poly crystalline rings | Hydrogel casting | - | - | 1.91 ± 0.08 MPa | - | [ |
| Chemically | Hydrophilic polymer | Hydrogel casting | - | - | - | - | [ |
| Graphene oxide | poly (acrylic acid-co-acrylamidophenylboronic acid) | Gel Film Transformation technique | - | - | 382 ± 12 MPa | 7.50 ± 0.4 MJ/m3 | [ |
| 3D Graphene | hydroxyapatite | Hydrothermal method | - | - | 2.8 MPa·m0.5 | [ | |
| Thermally reduced grapheme oxide | Natural polymer | Compression moulding | - | - | 3.5 GPa | - | [ |
| Graphene oxide | Polyurethane | In-situ polymerization | 40.2 ± 1.8 MPa | 192.9 ± 4.7 MJ/m3 | [ | ||