| Literature DB >> 34066516 |
Mary Morris1, Xiaofei Philip Ye1, Christopher J Doona2,3.
Abstract
The increasing use of functional aramids in a wide array of applications and the inert nature ofEntities:
Keywords: cationic dye; glycerol; nonthermal plasma; para-aramid textiles; soybean oil
Year: 2021 PMID: 34066516 PMCID: PMC8125445 DOI: 10.3390/polym13091492
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1(A) Diagram of the NTP system and (B) photo showing a sample under glowing plasma discharge.
Experiment A: experimental design and results @.
| Sample | Dye Solvent | Pretreatment | NTP Time (s) | Swelling Agent | K/S | K/S Std * |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Water | None | 60 | None | 1.26 | 0.009 |
| A2 | Water | None | 0 | None | 1.20 | 0.054 |
| A3 | Water | Acetic acid | 60 | None | 1.22 | 0.011 |
| A4 | Water | Acetic acid | 0 | None | 1.12 | 0.018 |
| A5 | Water | None | 60 | Benzyl–OH | 1.44 | 0.003 |
| A6 | Water | None | 0 | Benzyl–OH | 1.56 | 0.026 |
| A7 | Water | Acetic acid | 60 | Benzyl–OH | 1.74 | 0.021 |
| A8 | Water | Acetic acid | 0 | Benzyl–OH | 1.59 | 0.016 |
| A9 | Glycerol | None | 60 | None | 0.42 | 0.005 |
| A10 | Glycerol | None | 0 | None | 0.39 | 0.009 |
| A11 | Glycerol | Acetic acid | 60 | None | 0.45 | 0.004 |
| A12 | Glycerol | Acetic acid | 0 | None | 0.40 | 0.005 |
| A13 | Glycerol | None | 60 | Benzyl–OH | 0.41 | 0.002 |
| A14 | Glycerol | None | 0 | Benzyl–OH | 0.42 | 0.003 |
| A15 | Glycerol | Acetic acid | 60 | Benzyl–OH | 0.48 | 0.019 |
| A16 | Glycerol | Acetic acid | 0 | Benzyl–OH | 0.47 | 0.004 |
@ Experiment conducted at soaking time in 20 wt.% acetic acid solution = 15 h, dye concentration = 0.1 wt.%, Benzyl alcohol concentration = 2 wt.%, T = 140 °C, dyeing time = 1 h. * Values represent mean and standard error of 3 replicates.
Figure 2Statistical inference of Experiment A: significant factorial interactions.
Experiment B: experimental design and results @.
| Sample | Dye Solvent | Pretreatment | Swelling Agent | NTP Time (s) | K/S | K/S Std * |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | 80% Glycerol | Soy oil | Benzyl–OH | 60 | 0.70 | 0.015 |
| B2 | 80% Glycerol | Soy oil | Benzyl–OH | 0 | 0.57 | 0.012 |
| B3 | 80% Glycerol | Soy oil | None | 60 | 0.79 | 0.014 |
| B4 | 80% Glycerol | Soy oil | None | 0 | 0.56 | 0.004 |
| B5 | 80% Glycerol | None | Benzyl–OH | 60 | 0.55 | 0.003 |
| B6 | 80% Glycerol | None | Benzyl–OH | 0 | 0.53 | 0.004 |
| B7 | 80% Glycerol | None | None | 60 | 0.46 | 0.017 |
| B8 | 80% Glycerol | None | None | 0 | 0.44 | 0.013 |
| B9 | 50% Glycerol | Soy oil | Benzyl–OH | 60 | 0.84 | 0.005 |
| B10 | 50% Glycerol | Soy oil | Benzyl–OH | 0 | 0.67 | 0.009 |
| B11 | 50% Glycerol | Soy oil | None | 60 | 0.94 | 0.001 |
| B12 | 50% Glycerol | Soy oil | None | 0 | 0.92 | 0.005 |
| B13 | 50% Glycerol | None | Benzyl–OH | 60 | 0.81 | 0.014 |
| B14 | 50% Glycerol | None | Benzyl–OH | 0 | 0.70 | 0.010 |
| B15 | 50% Glycerol | None | None | 60 | 0.72 | 0.006 |
| B16 | 50% Glycerol | None | None | 0 | 0.82 | 0.013 |
@ Experiment carried out with soaking in soybean oil time = 15 h, dye concentration = 0.1 wt.%, Benzyl alcohol concentration = 2 wt.%, T = 140 °C and dyeing time = 1 h. * Mean and standard error of 3 replicates.
Figure 3Statistical inference of Experiment B: significant factorial interactions.
Experiment C: experimental design and the results @.
| Sample | Dye Solvent | Pretreatment | Swelling Agent | NTP Time (s) | K/S | K/S Std * |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | 50% Glycerol | Soy oil | Benzyl–OH | 90 | 0.91 | 0.021 |
| C2 | 50% Glycerol | Soy oil | Benzyl–OH | 0 | 0.60 | 0.002 |
| C3 | 50% Glycerol | Soy oil | None | 90 | 1.06 | 0.045 |
| C4 | 50% Glycerol | Soy oil | None | 0 | 0.57 | 0.006 |
| C5 | 50% Glycerol | None | Benzyl–OH | 90 | 0.96 | 0.009 |
| C6 | 50% Glycerol | None | Benzyl–OH | 0 | 0.74 | 0.015 |
| C7 | 50% Glycerol | None | None | 90 | 1.04 | 0.027 |
| C8 | 50% Glycerol | None | None | 0 | 0.66 | 0.013 |
| C9 | Water | Soy oil | Benzyl–OH | 90 | 1.66 | 0.262 |
| C10 | Water | Soy oil | Benzyl–OH | 0 | 1.15 | 0.008 |
| C11 | Water | Soy oil | None | 90 | 1.72 | 0.072 |
| C12 | Water | Soy oil | None | 0 | 0.86 | 0.008 |
| C13 | Water | None | Benzyl–OH | 90 | 1.68 | 0.024 |
| C14 | Water | None | Benzyl–OH | 0 | 1.31 | 0.104 |
| C15 | Water | None | None | 90 | 1.09 | 0.034 |
| C16 | Water | None | None | 0 | 0.92 | 0.012 |
@ Experiment was carried out with soaking in soybean oil for time = 15 h, dye concentration = 0.1 wt.%, Benzyl alcohol concentration = 2 wt.%, T = 90 °C and dyeing time = 1 h. * Mean and standard error of 3 replicates.
Figure 4Statistical inference of Experiment C: significant factorial interactions.
Experiment D: experimental design and the results @.
| Sample | Surfactant | Pretreatment | NTP Time (s) | K/S | K/S Std * |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | None | None | 30 | 0.81 | 0.006 |
| D2 | None | Soy oil | 30 | 1.01 | 0.008 |
| D3 | None | None | 150 | 0.97 | 0.008 |
| D4 | None | Soy oil | 150 | 1.20 | 0.017 |
| D5 | TWEEN | None | 30 | 0.61 | 0.010 |
| D6 | TWEEN | Soy oil | 30 | 0.60 | 0.002 |
| D7 | TWEEN | None | 150 | 0.79 | 0.003 |
| D8 | TWEEN | Soy oil | 150 | 0.84 | 0.005 |
@ Experiment carried out with soaking in soybean oil for time = 15 h, dye solvent = water, dye concentration = 0.1 wt.%, T = 90 °C and dyeing time = 1 h. * Mean and standard error of 3 replicates.
Figure 5Statistical inference of Experiment D: significant factorial interactions.
Figure 6Effect of NTP time on K/S value of soybean oil-soaked para-aramids.
Experiment F: experimental design and the results @.
| Sample | Temperature | Acetic Acid | Swelling Agent | NTP | K/S | K/S Std * | ΔK/S # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | 70 °C | Yes | Benzyl–OH | Post | 1.08 | 0.016 | −0.08 |
| F2 | 70 °C | Yes | Benzyl–OH | Prior | 0.91 | 0.022 | −0.13 |
| F3 | 70 °C | Yes | None | Post | 0.99 | 0.005 | −0.17 |
| F4 | 70 °C | Yes | None | Prior | 0.91 | 0.045 | −0.27 |
| F5 | 70 °C | No | Benzyl–OH | Post | 1.18 | 0.008 | −0.15 |
| F6 | 70 °C | No | Benzyl–OH | Prior | 1.12 | 0.025 | −0.27 |
| F7 | 70 °C | No | None | Post | 0.96 | 0.023 | −0.06 |
| F8 | 70 °C | No | None | Prior | 0.93 | 0.007 | −0.31 |
| F9 | 100 °C | Yes | Benzyl–OH | Post | 1.55 | 0.012 | −0.04 |
| F10 | 100 °C | Yes | Benzyl–OH | Prior | 1.15 | 0.016 | −0.20 |
| F11 | 100 °C | Yes | None | Post | 1.30 | 0.007 | −0.10 |
| F12 | 100 °C | Yes | None | Prior | 1.06 | 0.020 | −0.17 |
| F13 | 100 °C | No | Benzyl–OH | Post | 1.45 | 0.010 | −0.12 |
| F14 | 100 °C | No | Benzyl–OH | Prior | 1.21 | 0.068 | −0.16 |
| F15 | 100 °C | No | None | Post | 2.28 | 0.064 | −0.09 |
| F16 | 100 °C | No | None | Prior | 1.01 | 0.013 | −0.17 |
@ Experiment carried out with soaking in soybean oil for time = 15 h, dye solvent = water, dye concentration = 0.1 wt.%, dyeing time = 1 h, Additive concentrations = 1 wt.% Acetic acid and/or 2 wt.% Benzyl alcohol and the NTP treatment time = 120 s prior to or post soaking in soybean oil for 15 h. * Mean and standard error of 3 replicates. # The change in K/S value was calculated by subtracting the K/S after the 1st detergent wash from the K/S value measured after the 2nd detergent wash.
Figure 7Analysis of Experiment F. (A) Main effects of all of the factors and (B) the significant interactions.
Figure 8Scanned images comparing dyed samples with the undyed fabric (labels correspond to the sample numbers in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5; F15 (W2) denotes sample F15 after second detergent wash).
Figure 9FTIR spectra of the para-aramid fabrics, materials and after certain treatments as follows: (I) Soybean oil; (II) Para-aramid fabric (untreated); (III) Para-aramid fabric treated with NTP; (IV) Para-aramid fabric after soaking in soybean oil; (V) Para-aramid fabric after soaking in soybean oil followed by a subsequent NTP treatment; (VI) Para-aramid fabric dyed with NTP as the only pretreatment; (VII) Para-aramid fabric dyed after soaking in soybean oil (without an NTP treatment); (VIII) Para-aramid fabric dyed after soaking in soybean oil and an NTP treatment; and (IX) Victoria Blue R cationic dye.