| Literature DB >> 34066186 |
Sergio Márquez-Sánchez1,2, Israel Campero-Jurado3, Daniel Robles-Camarillo4, Sara Rodríguez1, Juan M Corchado-Rodríguez1,2,5,6.
Abstract
Wearable technologies are becoming a profitable means of monitoring a person's health state, such as heart rate and physical activity. The use of the smartwatch is becoming consolidated, not only as a novelty but also as a very useful tool for daily use. In addition, other devices, such as helmets or belts, are beneficial for monitoring workers and the early detection of any anomaly. They can provide valuable information, especially in work environments, where they help reduce the rate of accidents and occupational diseases, which makes them powerful Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). The constant monitoring of the worker's health can be done in real-time, through temperature, falls, noise, impacts, or heart rate meters, activating an audible and vibrating alarm when an anomaly is detected. The gathered information is transmitted to a server in charge of collecting and processing it. In the first place, this paper provides an exhaustive review of the state of the art on works related to electronics for human activity behavior. After that, a smart multisensory bracelet, combined with other devices, developed a control platform that can improve operators' security in the working environment. Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Things (AIoT) bring together the information to improve safety on construction sites, power stations, power lines, etc. Real-time and historic data is used to monitor operators' health and a hybrid system between Gaussian Mixture Model and Human Activity Classification. That is, our contribution is also founded on the use of two machine learning models, one based on unsupervised learning and the other one supervised. Where the GMM gave us a performance of 80%, 85%, 70%, and 80% for the 4 classes classified in real time, the LSTM obtained a result under the confusion matrix of 0.769, 0.892, and 0.921 for the carrying-displacing, falls, and walking-standing activities, respectively. This information was sent in real time through the platform that has been used to analyze and process the data in an alarm system.Entities:
Keywords: AIoT; Gaussian mixture model; anomaly detection; artificial intelligence; deeptech; human activity classification; machine learning; smart PPE; smart bracelet
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34066186 PMCID: PMC8151709 DOI: 10.3390/s21103372
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Patent watch/bracelet form USD535205S1 [35].
Proposals related to wearable monitoring and sensor networks in a wrist band.
| Bibliography | Sensors Included | Advantages and Disadvantages | Novelty of the Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shin, D. M. | GPS, ambient light sensor, accelerometer, | It stands out for including GPS and | It is an intelligent surveillance system, for the use and improvement |
| Perez, M. N. | Optical heart rate sensor, accelerometer, | It measures activities, such as exercise | Monitor the user’s daily activities, including exercise, sleep quality, |
| Shin, D. et al. | GPS, ambient light sensor, accelerometer, | The work is focused on dementia and | The main purpose of the bracelet is to prevent dementia patients |
| Sendra, S. et al. | Accelerometer, microphone, heart rate, and | It is focused on disease measurement | Control of chronic diseases of children with remote monitoring |
| Chen, M. et al. | Electrocardiogram, temperature and the | It measures oxygen in the blood, a | Monitoring the psychological state of the user using Smart Personal |
| Kajornkasirat, S. | Heart rate sensor, vibrator, audio support, | Aspects of daily life are detected | Counts the steps, the calories burned, monitors our sleep, and |
| Maglogiannis, I. | Accelerometer, gyroscope and contact sensors, | Falls are detected with the CUSUM | Initial evaluation of fall detection using the CUSUM algorithm |
| Alsulami, M. H. | Heart rate sensor | Heart rate is monitored with an expert | The use of smart watches to monitor heart rate in older people |
| Karakaya, M. | Accelerometer and gyroscope | It only uses an IMU with a KNN | Remote monitoring of elderly people’s activities using Smart Watch |
| Reeder, B. et al. | Gyroscope, microphones, optical heart rate | Very comprehensive review in | Systematic review of the uses of intelligent surveillance for health |
| Nguyen, D. N. | Shock sensor, microphone, pulse sensor, | Detection of parameters for anomaly | Smart Watch with automatic voice recording and alarm |
| Parara, A., & | Heart rate sensor, GPS, | A system including positioning and a | Intelligent user care security surveillance device |
| Mukhopadhyay, | Body temperature sensor, heart rate meter | It focuses on Human Behavior Activity | Review of wearable sensors for monitoring human activity |
| Gope, C. (2015). | Accelerometer, GPS, panic button | It is aimed at the detection of epileptic | Smart Watch for surveillance and monitoring of seizures / abnormal |
| Wile, D. J. | Accelerometer | It is aimed at tremor analysis | Smart Watch accelerometry for tremor analysis and diagnosis |
| Kumari, P. | Electroencephalogram (EEG), electrooculogram | This is similar work that focuses on | Review of wearables and multimodal interface for human activity |
| Manisha, M. | Heart rate and blood pressure sensor | The application is heart attack detection. | Device targeting heart disease, monitoring heartbeats and blood |
| Dhull, R. | Failure of respiratory system of human, body | The smartwatch is used for COVID | Discuss the design, principle of operation and features of |
| Adjiski, V. | Accelerometer, gyroscope, magnometer, | It is dedicated to mining and the | Real-time safety situation awareness and predict health and safety |
Identification of common risk situations in the worker’s environment and electronic components.
| Risk Factors | Associated Hazards | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Heart rate | - Heart attack and irregular heartbeat | - Wearing a heart rate sensor on the wrist |
| Temperature | - Extreme temperature changes | - Implementation of temperature sensors in the bracelet |
| Operator Movement | - Slips, trips and falls | - The use of IMU capable of detecting falls or impacts |
| Reporting an accident | - Falls, intoxication, fire, collapse, heart | - Resistive touch pad |
Figure 2Electronic modules chosen.
Technical specifications of the sensors selected for the device.
| Component | Characteristics | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Thermocouple Type-K | - Precision: ±1 ºC | Glass braid insulated stainless steel tip which |
| Heart Rate Monitor Sensor | - Input Voltage (Vin): 3.3–6 V (5 V recommended) | It is based on PPG techniques, to detect blood |
| BMI160 Inertial sensor (IMU) | - Sensitivity (typ.) Acc. ±2 g:16,384 LSB/g, ±4 g:8192 LSB/g, ±8 g:4096 LSB/g, ±16 g:2048 LSB/g | It is an inertial measurement unit (IMU) consisting |
| Square Force-Sensitive | - Actuation Force ∼0.2 N min | FSRs are sensors that allow to detect physical |
Figure 3Electronic modules chosen.
Figure 4Bracelet with electronic components and their deployment on the fabric.
Figure 5Bracelet with the electronics and sensors included.
Figure 6BeSafe B2.0 Platform, bracelet alarm panel.
Figure 7System architecture.
Figure 8Bracelet pulse alarm configuration.
Figure 9Picture of the data displayed on the screen and of the active pulse alarm.
Figure 10Data analysis through the union of a model based on anomalies and the following one based on time series.
Figure 11Concept of Recurrent Neural Networks.
Figure 12Behavior of the time series for the fall tag.
Figure 13Histogram diagram of number of samples by class.
Figure 14LSTM history loss training and testing dataset.
Figure 15Confusion matrix LSTM.
Fisher analysis performed to determine the components to be used.
| Grouping Information Using the Fisher | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temp | N | Mean | Grouping | |||
| 36.50 | 168 | 5.000 | A | |||
| 42.00 | 303 | 4.0264 | B | |||
| 41.75 | 761 | 4.01840 | B | |||
| 40.50 | 1051 | 4.01808 | B | |||
| 40.25 | 809 | 4.01731 | B | |||
| 41.00 | 2183 | 4.01466 | B | |||
| 40.75 | 1601 | 4.01437 | B | |||
| 41.25 | 1520 | 4.01118 | B | |||
| 41.50 | 1131 | 4.00973 | B | |||
| 40.00 | 301 | 4.0033 | B | |||
| 42.25 | 166 | 3.99398 | B | |||
| 39.50 | 1 | 2.0000 | C | |||
| 39.00 | 1 | 2.0000 | C | |||
| 38.50 | 1 | 2.0000 | C | |||
| 38.25 | 1 | 2.0000 | C | |||
| 37.50 | 1 | 0.0000 | D | |||
| 37.50 | 1 | 0.0000 | D | |||
Figure 16The K-Means between temperature and heartbeat, without constrain.
Figure 17The K-Means between temperature and heartbeat with 2 clusters.
Figure 18Delimited groupings for 4 labels and 2 variables.
Figure 19GMM distribution of the 2 classes on the bracelet.
Figure 20GMM distribution of the 4 classes on the bracelet.
Figure 21Data separation by GMM.
Figure 22Comparation GMM versus K-Means.
Figure 23Results of GMM in real time.
Figure 24ROC curve for GMM and K-Means, showing the rate of false alarms versus true alarms.
Figure 25ROC curve for GMM and K-Means, zoomed in at top left.