| Literature DB >> 34066148 |
Quan Mao1,2, Meng Liu1,3, Yajie Li1,3, Yuquan Wei1, Yong Yang1,2, Zhengren Huang1,2.
Abstract
Titanium oxide is widely applied as a photocatalyst. However, its low efficiency and narrow light absorption range are two main disadvantages that severely impede its practical application. In this work, black TiOx films with different chemical compositions were fabricated by tuning target voltage and controlling O2 flow during reactive DC magnetron sputtering. The optimized TiOx films with mixed phases (TiO, Ti2O3, Ti3O5, and TiO2) exhibited fantastic photothermal and photocatalytic activity by combining high light-absorptive Ti2O3 and Ti3O5 phases with the photocatalytic TiO2 phase. The sample prepared with oxygen flow at 5.6 ± 0.2 sccm and target voltage near 400 V exhibited excellent optical absorbance of 89.29% under visible light, which could improve surface temperature to 114 °C under sunlight. This film could degrade Rhodamine-B up to 74% after 150 min of UV irradiation. In a word, this work provides a guideline for fabricating black TiOx films with photothermal-assisted photocatalytic activity by reactive DC magnetron sputtering, which could avoid the usage of hydrogen and is convenient for quantity preparation.Entities:
Keywords: black TiOx; photothermal-assisted photocatalysis; reactive sputtering
Year: 2021 PMID: 34066148 PMCID: PMC8151715 DOI: 10.3390/ma14102508
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
The sputtering parameters and the average optical absorbance of Samples S1, S2, S3, and S4 from 250 to 800 nm.
| Sample | Voltage/V | O2 Flow/sccm | Ar Flow/sccm | Average Absorbance/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 360 ± 5 | 3.4 ± 0.2 | 36.6 ± 0.2 | 67.37 |
| S2 | 380 ± 5 | 5.2 ± 0.2 | 34.8 ± 0.2 | 81.50 |
| S3 | 400 ± 5 | 5.6 ± 0.2 | 34.4 ± 0.2 | 89.29 |
| S4 | 420 ± 5 | 6.0 ± 0.2 | 34.0 ± 0.2 | 17.87 |
Figure 1The XRD patterns of Samples S1, S2, S3, and S4, substrate, and pure anatase TiO2.
Figure 2The binding energy of Ti 2p on the surface of the films before etching: (a) S1, (b) S2, and (c) S3; the binding energy of Ti 2p on the surface of the films after etching: (d) S1, (e) S2, and (f) S3.
O: Ti atomic ratio of the three samples and valence distribution of Ti element.
| Sample | S1 | S2 | S3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| O: Ti (XPS) | 1.30 | 1.20 | 1.29 |
| O: Ti (EDS) | 0.67 | 1.07 | 1.23 |
| Ti4+/% | 30.73 | 43.89 | 44.27 |
| Ti3+/% | 19.65 | 24.41 | 26.44 |
| Ti2+/% | 39.01 | 31.70 | 29.29 |
| Ti/% | 10.61 | 0 | 0 |
Figure 3The SEM images of the films: (a) S1; (b) S2; (c) S3.
Roughness, thickness, and grain size of the films.
| Sample | S1 | S2 | S3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| PV/nm | 29.90 | 49.98 | 58.76 |
| RMS/nm | 3.53 | 6.40 | 7.84 |
| Ra/nm | 2.79 | 5.08 | 6.26 |
| Thickness/nm | 580 | 700 | 800 |
| Average particle size/nm | 30.0 | 38.7 | 40.2 |
Figure 4(a) The ultraviolet-visible absorbance of Samples S1, S2, S3, and S4; (b) the absorbance of films treated by H2 or N2, No.1: untreated TiO2, No.2: TiO2 treated by H2, No.3: TiO2 treated by N2.
Figure 5(a) The dye degradation dynamic curve of Sample S3 under visible light and ultraviolet; (b) the dye degradation dynamic curve of Sample S1, S2, S3, and S4 under UV light; (c) the photoelectric current of Sample S1, S2, S3, and S4 under visible light.
The photocatalytic efficiency of some TiO2 films by sputtering methods.
| Materials and Methods | Simulated Pollutant | Light Source | Degradation Rate/%·h−1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| RF magnetron sputtering, TiO2 [ | Rhodamine-B (0.5 mg/L) | 8 W-254 nm | 25 |
| Pulse magnetron sputtering, TiO2 [ | Methyl orange (10 mg/L) | 36 W-365 nm | 23 |
| DC reactive sputtering ZnO2/TiO2 [ | Methylene blue (10 mg/L) | 15 W-254 nm | 15–21 |
| Glancing angle deposition [ | Methylene blue (10 mg/L) | AM 1.5 G | 22–31 |
| RF magnetron sputtering, TiN/TiO2 [ | Rhodamine-B (5 mg/L) | 500 W full wavelength | 20–40 |
| Our work | Rhodamine-B (10 mg/L) | 25 W-254 nm | 13–30 |