| Literature DB >> 34065865 |
Maria Kantere1, Labrini V Athanasiou1, Alexios Giannakopoulos1, Vassilis Skampardonis1, Marina Sofia1, George Valiakos1, Zoi Athanasakopoulou1, Antonia Touloudi1, Dimitris C Chatzopoulos1,2, Vassiliki Spyrou3, Charalambos Billinis1,2.
Abstract
Canine parvovirus type 2 (CPV-2) primarily infects dogs, which are the main host reservoir, causing severe gastrointestinal disease associated with immunosuppression. The present study was conducted in Thessaly, Greece and aimed to identify risk and environmental factors associated with CPV-2 infection in diarrheic dogs. Fecal samples were collected from 116 dogs presenting diarrhea and were tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the presence of CPV-2 DNA. Supplementary data regarding clinical symptoms, individual features, management factors and medical history were also gathered for each animal during clinical evaluation. Sixty-eight diarrheic dogs were found to be positive for the virus DNA in their feces. Statistical analysis revealed that CPV-2 DNA was less likely to be detected in senior dogs, while working dogs, namely hounds and shepherds, had higher odds to be positive for the virus. Livestock density and land uses, specifically the categories of discontinuous urban fabric and of human population density, were identified as significant environmental parameters associated with CPV-2 infection by using Geographical Information System (GIS) together with the Ecological Niche Model (ENM). This is the first description of the environmental variables associated with the presence of CPV-2 DNA in dogs' feces in Greece.Entities:
Keywords: Canine parvovirus type 2 (CPV-2); diarrheic dogs; environmental parameters; polymerase chain reaction; risk factors; spatial analysis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34065865 PMCID: PMC8151960 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10050590
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathogens ISSN: 2076-0817
Figure 1Map of Thessaly Region in Greek mainland depicting with red dots the geographical distribution of the confirmed 68 CPV-2 infections in the Regional Units of Karditsa, Larissa, Magnesia and Trikala.
CPV-2 positive and negative dogs in association with ten factors and their respective categories.
| Factors | Categories | Number of Dogs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | CPV-2 Positive | CPV-2 Negative | ||
| Gender | Male | 66 | 40 | 26 |
| Female | 50 | 28 | 22 | |
| Age * | <1 years old | 48 | 33 | 15 |
| ≥1 and <9 years old | 54 | 31 | 23 | |
| ≥9 years old | 14 | 4 | 10 | |
| Utility * | Pet | 67 | 35 | 32 |
| Working dog | 18 | 17 | 1 | |
| Stray dog | 31 | 16 | 15 | |
| Living environment | Indoors | 13 | 6 | 7 |
| Outdoors | 73 | 45 | 28 | |
| Both | 30 | 17 | 13 | |
| Contact | Dog | 31 | 20 | 11 |
| Cat | 33 | 19 | 14 | |
| Other animal species | 52 | 29 | 23 | |
| Abdominal palpation | Normal findings | 105 | 64 | 41 |
| Abnormal findings | 11 | 4 | 7 | |
| Anorexia | Presence | 22 | 12 | 10 |
| Absence | 94 | 56 | 38 | |
| Hemorrhagic diarrhea | Presence | 80 | 50 | 30 |
| Absence | 36 | 18 | 18 | |
| Body Temperature | Within reference interval | 78 | 43 | 35 |
| Fever | 27 | 18 | 9 | |
| Hypothermia | 11 | 7 | 4 | |
| Vomiting | Presence | 35 | 20 | 15 |
| Absence | 81 | 48 | 33 | |
* Statistically significant factors are shown with background gray color.
Contributions of the environmental variables to the Maxent model including percent contribution and permutation importance.
| Environmental Variable | Code | Percent Contribution | Permutation Importance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Livestock density | goatsden | 50.9 | 76.3 |
| Human population density | popden | 27.6 | 1.5 |
| Land uses | landcorine | 12.8 | 3.7 |
| June NDVI 1 | junendvi | 2.6 | 3.8 |
| Distance from small ruminant farms | farmsdis | 1.8 | 0 |
| Altitude | dem | 1.3 | 0.3 |
| Annual mean temperature | clima1 | 1.3 | 11 |
| Total annual precipitation | clima12 | 0.8 | 2.9 |
| Distance from water collections | waterdis | 0.5 | 0.2 |
1 NDVI: normalized difference vegetation index.
Figure 2Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of Maxent model for CPV-2 DNA positive dogs. The area under the curve (AUC) had value of 0.983 and exceeded that of random prediction (AUC = 0.5).
Figure 3Jackknife of the regularized training gain (Maxent model) for CPV-2 DNA positive dogs. Livestock density (goatsden) and land uses (landcorine) were the environmental variables with substantial contribution to the model: without variable (light blue), with only one variable (blue), with all variables (red).
Figure 4Map of Thessaly Region displaying the potential geographic distribution of CPV-2 as predicted by MaxEnt analysis based on the confirmed virus cases in dogs (red dots). Suggested high-risk areas for CPV-2 further dispersion were indicated with brown color.
The 34 environmental variables included in GIS analysis.
| Code | Environmental Variable |
|---|---|
|
| Annual mean temperature (°C) |
|
| Mean diurnal temperature range (°C) |
|
| Isothermality ( |
|
| Temperature seasonality (standard deviation × 100) |
|
| Maximum temperature of warmest month (°C) |
|
| Minimum temperature of coldest month (°C) |
|
| Temperature annual range (°C) |
|
| Mean temperature of wettest quarter (°C) |
|
| Mean temperature of driest quarter (°C) |
|
| Mean temperature of warmest quarter (°C) |
|
| Mean temperature of coldest quarter (°C) |
|
| Total annual precipitation (mm) |
|
| Total precipitation of wettest month (mm) |
|
| Total precipitation of driest month (mm) |
|
| Precipitation seasonality (coefficient of variation) |
|
| Total precipitation of wettest quarter (mm) |
|
| Total precipitation of driest quarter (mm) |
|
| Total precipitation of warmest quarter (mm) |
|
| Total precipitation of coldest quarter (mm) |
|
| Annual mean wind speed (m s−1) |
|
| Altitude (m) |
|
| Distance from water collections (m) |
|
| Distance from small ruminant farms (m) |
|
| Sheep, goat and cattle density (animals km−2) |
|
| Land use (principal) |
|
| April |
|
| May NDVI |
|
| June NDVI |
|
| July NDVI |
|
| August NDVI |
|
| September NDVI |
|
| October NDVI |
|
| November NDVI |
|
| Human population density (people km−2) |
1NDVI: normalized difference vegetation index.