| Literature DB >> 34065578 |
Magdalena Wilczopolska1, Katarzyna Nowakowska-Langier1, Sebastian Okrasa1, Lukasz Skowronski2, Roman Minikayev3, Grzegorz W Strzelecki1, Rafal Chodun4, Krzysztof Zdunek4.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: Raman spectroscopy; copper nitride; optical properties; plasma surface engineering method; pulsed magnetron sputtering
Year: 2021 PMID: 34065578 PMCID: PMC8160974 DOI: 10.3390/ma14102694
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1(a) Schematic diagram of the apparatus used in the experiment; (b) the scheme of current pulse time behavior in the AC and DC modes of pulsed power supply.
PMS process parameters for synthesizing Cu–N layers.
| Sample Name | Material | Working Mode | Gas Atmosphere | Pressure (Pa) | Time (min) | Power (W) | dS-T (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Cu–N layers | AC | Ar + N2 | 2 | 120 | 80 | 10 |
| A2 | Cu–N layers | AC | N2 | 2 | 120 | 80 | 10 |
| A3 | Cu–N layers | DC | Ar + N2 | 2 | 60 | 80 | 10 |
| A4 | Cu–N layers | DC | N2 | 2 | 60 | 80 | 10 |
Figure 2SEM images of Cu–N layers synthesized with various process parameters (a–d) cross-section; (e–h) surface morphology.
Figure 3(a) The X-ray diffraction patterns and (b) Raman spectra of the Cu–N layers.
Phase composition, N/Cu by EDS, lattice constant crystallite size, and Raman shift of the synthesized Cu–N layers according to various PMS process parameters.
| Sample | Phase | N/Cu by EDS | Lattice Constant | Crystallite Size | Raman Shift | FWHM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | Cu3N | 23.05/76.95 | 3.808 ± 0.00031 | 35 | 635 ± 2 | 107 ± 1 |
| A2 | Cu3N | 24.89/75.11 | 3.815 ± 0.00021 | 33 | 632 ± 1 | 74 ± 2 |
| A3 | Cu3N | 21.78/78.22 | 3.813 ± 0.00012 | 35 | 626 ± 2 | 35 ± 1 |
| Cu3N (Cu) | 3.828 ± 0.00017 | 15 | ||||
| A4 | Cu3N | 23.38/76.62 | 3.813 ± 0.00023 | 30 | 628 ± 1 | 42 ± 1 |
Figure 4Elllipsometric azimuths (a) Ψ and (b) Δ and (c) transmittance spectra for A4 sample. Experimental data (circles, squares, triangles, and stars) are plotted every third (Ψ and Δ) or tenth (T) collected point. Solid lines represent the spectra calculated from the optical model of sample.
Thicknesses of rough (dr) and Cu–N (dCu–N) layers, Drude parameters (ℏωp, ℏΓ), mean relaxation time (τ), optical resistivity (.
| Sample Name | A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.9 ± 0.1 | 9.7 ± 0.1 | 4.8 ± 0.2 | 9.1 ± 0.1 | |
| 79.6 ± 0.2 | 115.3 ± 0.2 | 222.1 ± 0.6 | 192.4 ± 0.2 | |
| 0.27 ± 0.02 | - | 0.58 ± 0.05 | - | |
| 0.79 ± 0.39 | - | 0.10 ± 0.03 | - | |
| 0.8 ± 0.4 | - | 6.4 ± 1.5 | - | |
| 80 ± 42 | - | 2.3 ± 0.6 | - | |
| 2.47 ± 0.03 | 2.37 ± 0.03 | 2.17 ± 0.03 | 2.38 ± 0.02 |
Figure 5(a) Real part of the complex refractive index and (b) extinction coefficient of the Cu–N layers.
Figure 6(a) Transmittance spectra recorded for the Cu–N layers. The data for glass are added for comparison; (b) The Tauc plot for the Cu–N layers.