| Literature DB >> 34065064 |
Lívia A Tavares1, Allan A Rezende1, Jymmys L Santos2, Charles S Estevam2, Ana M O Silva3, Jaderson K Schneider4, John L S Cunha5, Daniela Droppa-Almeida6, Ivan J Correia-Neto7, Juliana C Cardoso1,6, Patricia Severino1,6,8, Eliana B Souto8,9, Ricardo L C de Albuquerque-Júnior1,6.
Abstract
The essential oil of Cymbopogon winterianus (EOCW) is a natural product with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antifibrotic properties. We studied the effect of EOCW in the progression of histological changes of pulmonary fibrosis (PF) in a rodent model. The oil was obtained by hydrodistillation and characterized using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Intratracheal instillation of bleomycin was performed in 30 rats to induce PF, while Sham animals were subjected to instillation of saline solution. The treatment was performed using daily oral administration of distilled water, EOCW at 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg, and deflazacort (DFC). After 28 days, hemogram and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), tissue levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT) were assayed. Histological grading of PF, immunohistochemical expression of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) were also analyzed. The EOCW major compounds were found to be citronellal, geraniol, and citronellol. EOCW significantly reduced inflammation in BALF, reduced MDA levels, and increased SOD activity. EOCW attenuated histological grading of PF and reduced immunohistochemical expression of α-SMA and TGF-β in a dose-dependent way, likely due to the reduction of oxidative stress, inflammation, and TGF-β-induced myofibroblast differentiation.Entities:
Keywords: Wistar rats; histological labelling; immunohistochemistry; myofibroblasts; pulmonary fibrosis; terpenes
Year: 2021 PMID: 34065064 PMCID: PMC8150729 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13050679
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Distribution of animals in experimental groups according to treatment.
| Groups ( | Pulmonary Damage Procedure | Oral Administration (Treatment) a |
|---|---|---|
| Sham b | Saline solution | Soybean oil |
| Vehicle c | Bleomycin sulfate (5 mg/kg) | Soybean oil |
| EOCW 50 c | Bleomycin sulfate (5 mg/kg) | 50 mg/kg essential oil of |
| EOCW 100 c | Bleomycin sulfate (5 mg/kg) | 100 mg/kg essential oil of |
| EOCW 200 c | Bleomycin sulfate (5 mg/kg) | 200 mg/kg essential oil of |
| DFC c | Bleomycin sulfate (5 mg/kg) | 1.0 mg/kg Deflazacort |
a The volume administered was 0.2 mL, regardless of the treatment. b Intratracheal instillation of saline and c bleomycin to induce pulmonary fibrosis.
Modified Ashcroft scale for histological grading of lung damage.
| Grade of Fibrosis | Modified Scale |
|---|---|
| 0 | Alveolar Septa: No fibrotic burden at the flimsiest small fibers in some alveolar walls |
| 1 | Alveolar Septa: Isolated gentle fibrotic changes (septum ≤3× thicker than normal) |
| 2 | Alveolar Septa: Clearly fibrotic changes (septum >3× thicker than normal) with not-like formation but not connected to each other |
| 3 | Alveolar Septa: Contiguous fibrotic walls (septum >3× thicker than normal) predominantly in whole microscopic field |
| 4 | Alveolar Septa: Variable |
| 5 | Alveolar Septa: Variable |
| 6 | Alveolar Septa: Variable, most not existent |
| 7 | Alveolar Septa: Non-existent |
| 8 | Alveolar Septa: Non-existent |
Chemical composition and retention indices of the chemical constituents of the EOCW.
| RT (min) a | Compounds b | (%) c | RI d |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.4 | 3-Hexanone, 2-methyl- | 0.01 | 871 |
| 11.0 | 5-Hepten-2-one, 6-methyl- | 0.03 | 987 |
| 11.1 | β-Myrcene | 0.10 | 990 |
| 12.7 | Limonene | 3.21 | 1027 |
| 13.9 | Melonal | 0.16 | 1053 |
| 15.4 | Terpinolene | 0.05 | 1087 |
| 16.0 | Linalool | 1.17 | 1101 |
| 16.5 | 0.05 | 1110 | |
| 17.2 | 0.03 | 1127 | |
| 18.1 | Isopulegol | 1.55 | 1145 |
| 18.7 | Citronellal | 32.61 | 1159 |
| 19.2 | Isopulegol | 0.10 | 1170 |
| 19.6 | 4-Terpineol | 0.07 | 1178 |
| 19.8 | Carane, 4,5-epoxy-, | 0.06 | 1183 |
| 20.2 | α-Terpineol | 0.09 | 1191 |
| 20.3 | 0.05 | 1194 | |
| 20.8 | Decanal | 0.20 | 1206 |
| 22.1 | Citronellol | 14.37 | 1233 |
| 22.5 | Neral | 1.32 | 1242 |
| 23.4 | Geraniol | 22.83 | 1262 |
| 23.8 | Geranial | 1.56 | 1272 |
| 25.9 | Citronellic acid | 0.26 | 1320 |
| 27.4 | Citronellol acetate | 0.93 | 1354 |
| 27.6 | Phenol, 4-allyl-2-methoxy- | 0.94 | 1359 |
| 28.7 | Geranyl acetate | 1.14 | 1384 |
| 29.0 | β-Element | 0.56 | 1392 |
| 30.1 | Caryophyllene | 0.04 | 1419 |
| 31.5 | Humulene | 0.07 | 1454 |
| 32.5 | Naphthalene, 1,2,4a,5,6,8a-hexahydro-4,7-dimethyl-1-(1-methylethyl)- | 0.07 | 1477 |
| 32.7 | Germacrene D | 0.97 | 1482 |
| 33.4 | α-Muurolene | 0.30 | 1501 |
| 33.6 | δ-Guaiene | 0.56 | 1506 |
| 34.0 | α-Amorphene | 0.24 | 1514 |
| 34.4 | β-Cadinene | 1.16 | 1524 |
| 35.4 | 3.64 | 1552 | |
| 36.4 | 1.02 | 1577 | |
| 36.7 | Caryophyllene oxide | 0.14 | 1584 |
| 38.1 | Eudesmol | 0.49 | 1621 |
| 38.4 | α-Acorenol | 0.46 | 1629 |
| 38.5 | α-Eudesmol | 1.26 | 1633 |
| 38.9 | α-Muurolol | 1.79 | 1644 |
| 39.0 | Cadinol | 0.45 | 1648 |
| 39.2 | β-Eudesmol | 0.67 | 1652 |
| 39.4 | α-Cadinol | 2.95 | 1657 |
| 41.5 | (Z,E)-Farnesol | 0.04 | 1716 |
| 41.7 | (E,E)-Farnesol | 0.21 | 1723 |
a RT, retention time; b compounds listed in order of elution from an DB-5MS column; c percentage based on FID peak area normalization; d RI, retention index, calculated using the Van den Dool and Kratz (1963) equation [29].
Body weight variation of animals according to the experimental group.
| Body Weight | Sham | Vehicle | EOCW 50 | EOCW 100 | EOCW 200 | DFC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial (g) | 174 ± 11.33 | 236.8 ± 20.7 | 213.33 ± 20.81 | 200.25 ± 12.01 | 179.83 ± 9.04 | 174.66 ± 6.31 |
| Final (g) | 183.4 ± 9.55 | 228.6 ± 15.14 | 206.66 ± 20.64 | 195 ± 7.02 | 182.5 ± 8.31 | 172.5 ± 6.22 |
| Body weight gain (%) | 5.17 ± 1.60 a | −3.46 ± 2.32 b | –3.24 ± 1.21 b | –2.63 ± 2.85 b | 1.42 ± 0.55 c | –1.27± 0.48 b,c |
Data are expressed as means ± SEM. Different letters (a, b, c) in the same line represent significantly different values between them (p < 0.05; ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test).
Hematological parameters of the animals submitted to the experiment.
| Hematological Parameters | Sham | Vehicle | EOCW (mg/kg) | DFC | Reference Range * | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | 100 | 200 | |||||
| Total leukocytes (×103/µL) | 4.7 ± 0.6 a | 3.1 ± 1.2 b | 5.0 ± 0.3 a | 4.5 ± 0.6 a | 6.1 ± 1.4 a | 3.6 ± 0.4 b | 2.3−9.9 |
| Red blood cells (×103/µL) | 8.0 ± 1.0 a | 5.8 ± 0.7 b | 6.1 ± 1.7 b | 6.1 ± 0.9 b | 7.6 ± 1.2 a | 9.0 ± 0.4 a | 5.2−8.8 |
| Hematocrit (%) | 51.8 ±1.9 a | 38.4 ± 4.0 b | 40.5 ± 0.70 b | 39.2 ± 1.70 b | 46.0 ± 2.4 a | 52.8 ± 2.9 a | 27.2–48.5 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 15.7 ± 0.9 | 13.7 ± 1.7 | 13.6 ± 0.9 | 13. 9 ± 0.8 | 14.6 ± 1.0 | 16.0 ± 0.8 | 11.1–17.1 |
| Platelets (×103/µL) | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.7 | 1.0 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.76–1.31 |
* Reference range values available in Lima et al. (2014) [32]. Different letters (a, b) in the same line express significantly different values between them (ANOVA and multiple comparison Tukey’s test, p < 0.05).
Figure 1Values obtained from bronchoalveolar lavage cells: (A) total cells; (B) neutrophils; (C) lymphocytes, and (D) macrophages. Significant differences compared to the Sham group are expressed with *** p < 0.001; significant differences compared to the Vehicle group are expressed as ### p < 0.001; significant differences compared to the OECW 50 group are expressed as ΔΔΔ p < 0.001; significant differences compared to the OECW 100 group are expressed as ΦΦΦ p < 0.001. (Kruska–Wallis, followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test).
Figure 2Effect of EOCW on oxidative stress parameters in bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis: (A) MDA production, (B) SOD activity, and (C) CAT activity. Significant differences compared to the group Sham are expressed as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001; significant differences compared to the Vehicle group are expressed as # p < 0.05 and ### p < 0.001; significant differences compared to the EOCW50 group are expressed as Δ p < 0.05.
Figure 3(A) Histological features observed in the pulmonary tissue of the experimental groups. Typical regular alveolar spaces (al), with thin septa, are seen in group Sham, whereas groups Vehicle and EOCW50 show thickened septa and fibrotic collapsed alveoli (hyperplasia of type II pneumocytes in detail). Partially obliterated alveoli and alveolar septa of variable thickness are seen in group EOCW100. Wider and more regular alveoli, with thin septa, are observed in groups EOCW200 and DFC (Masson’s trichrome, 400×). (B) Assessment of the modified Ashcroft scale of histological gradation of the bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in the experimental groups. Data are expressed as median, interquartile range, and maximum and minimum values. Significant differences compared to group Vehicle are expressed as ## p < 0.01 and ### p < 0.001; significant differences compared to group EOCW50 are expressed as ΔΔΔ p < 0.001 (Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s multiple comparisons test).
Figure 4(A) Cytoplasmic positivity pattern of immunohistochemical expression of α-SMA and TGF-β in group Sham and subjected to bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis (Masson’s trichrome, 400×). (B) Assessment of the immunohistochemical expression of α-SMA and (C) TGF-β in the pulmonary tissue of the experimental groups. Significant differences compared to group Sham are expressed as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001; compared to group Vehicle are expressed as # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 and ### p < 0.001; compared to EOCW50 are expressed as ΔΔ p < 0.01 (ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test).