| Literature DB >> 34064479 |
Célia Nogueira1,2, Lisbeth Silva1, Ana Marcão2, Carmen Sousa2, Helena Fonseca2, Hugo Rocha2, Teresa Campos3, Elisa Leão Teles3, Esmeralda Rodrigues3, Patrícia Janeiro4, Ana Gaspar4, Laura Vilarinho1,2.
Abstract
The electron-transfer flavoprotein dehydrogenase gene (ETFDH) encodes the ETF-ubiquinone oxidoreductase (ETF-QO) and has been reported to be the major cause of multiple acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (MADD). In this study, we present the clinical and molecular diagnostic challenges, at the DNA and RNA levels, involved in establishing the genotype of four MADD patients with novel ETFDH variants: a missense variant, two deep intronic variants and a gross deletion. RNA sequencing allowed the identification of the second causative allele in all studied patients. Simultaneous DNA and RNA investigation can increase the number of MADD patients that can be confirmed following the suggestive data results of an expanded newborn screening program. In clinical practice, accurate identification of pathogenic mutations is fundamental, particularly with regard to diagnostic, prognostic, therapeutic and ethical issues. Our study highlights the importance of RNA studies for a definitive molecular diagnosis of MADD patients, expands the background of ETFDH mutations and will be important in providing an accurate genetic counseling and a prenatal diagnosis for the affected families.Entities:
Keywords: ETFDH; MADD; NBS; RNA; glutaric aciduria type II; β-oxidation
Year: 2021 PMID: 34064479 PMCID: PMC8147995 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9050507
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomedicines ISSN: 2227-9059
Figure 1Families’ pedigrees and genotype data from four MADD families. Symbols: square, male; circle, female; filled, affected individual; diagonal line, deceased; NA, not available. Mutations found in ETFDH gene are shown below each symbol: -, wild-type allele; M1, p.Val324Met (c.970A>G); M2, c.35-768A>G; M3, p.Arg41* (c.121C>T); M4, c.35-1008 T>G; M5, p.Leu550Valfs*4 (c.1648_1649delCT); M6, c.34_607del; M7, p.Arg155Gly (c.463A>G).
Primers to sequence ETFDH cDNA and a region of interest in intron 1.
| Primers cDNA | Sequence | Annealing Temperature |
|---|---|---|
| F1 | TGTTGTGTCCGACCGAGA | 60 °C |
| R1 | TGGCTCCGTATGCAATCC | |
| F2 | AACGCCGTGAAGCAAGAG | 60 °C |
| R2 | CCACTTTTCATTGCTGTGTGA | |
| F3 | TCCTAGCATTCGGCCAAC | 60 °C |
| R3 | CCCGTAATTTCTTTATGGGACA | |
|
|
|
|
| i1F1 | TTCTCCCTAATTTGAAATGGTAT | 60 °C |
| i1R1 | GGCAGGTACCCTAGCATCAA | |
| i1F2 | CTGCCAAGGAGTTGAGAAAA | 60 °C |
| i1R2 | GCAATCTCAGCTCACCACAA |
Acylcarnitines profile of four MADD patients detected through newborn screening.
| Metabolite Marker | Metabolite Concentrations (μM) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference Values | Patient 1 | Patient 2 | Patient 3 | Patient 4 | |
| Free carnitine (C0) | >9.13 | 35.98 | 43.14 | 36.20 | 21.91 |
| Glutarylcarnitine (C5DC) | <0.20 | 0.39 | 0.17 | 0.10 | 1.75 |
| Butyrylcarnitine (C4) | <0.97 | 1.10 | 1.16 | 0.90 | 3.11 |
| Hexanoylcarnitine (C6) | <0.20 | 1.96 | 0.48 | 0.90 | 1.28 |
| Octanoylcarnitine (C8) | <0.30 | 3.96 | 1.13 | 2.51 | 6.40 |
| Decanoylcarnitine (C10) | <0.44 | 4.31 | 1.75 | 3.73 | 2.96 |
| Dodecanoylcarnitine (C12) | <0.51 | 3.29 | 2.32 | 4.36 | 2.23 |
| Dodecenoylcarnitine (C12:1) | <0.46 | 1.14 | 0.64 | 0.88 | 0.62 |
| Tetradecanoylcarnitine (C14) | <0.59 | 3.52 | 2.48 | 2.71 | 3.12 |
| Tetradecenoylcarnitine (C14:1) | <0.46 | 2.98 | 2.47 | 3.46 | 1.78 |
Figure 2Electropherograms of ETFDH mutations from (a) family 1, (b) family 2, (c) family 3 and (d) family 4, showing the deletion detected by Copy Number Variation analysis. (e) Sequence alignment among 8 vertebrates around the sites of the four exonic mutations. The four identified mutations are conserved across species.
Figure 3Schematic representation of ETFDH region including exon 1, intron 1 and exon 2. WT: structure of wild-type ETFDH transcript (exons 1–2). MUT: structure of ETFDH transcript generated due to (a) c.35-768A>G mutation (red, arrow) and (b) c.35-1008T>G mutation (red, arrow). Intron splice site acceptor and donor sequences are shown. In the two cases (a,b) the pseudoexons (blue) result from activation of the 5′ donor site that also results in preferential use of the existing 3′ acceptor site (GATAG) at the 5′ end of the pseudoexon to effect splicing. (c,d) Electropherograms showing the cDNA sequences of patients with the heterozygous mutations c.35-768A>G and c.35-1008T>G, respectively.