Literature DB >> 34063754

Social Distance during the COVID-19 Pandemic Reflects Perceived Rather Than Actual Risk.

Tina Iachini1, Francesca Frassinetti2,3, Francesco Ruotolo1, Filomena Leonela Sbordone1, Antonella Ferrara1, Maria Arioli4, Francesca Pazzaglia5, Andrea Bosco6, Michela Candini2, Antonella Lopez6, Alessandro Oronzo Caffò6, Zaira Cattaneo4,7, Ferdinando Fornara8, Gennaro Ruggiero1.   

Abstract

Interpersonal space (IPS) is the area surrounding our own bodies in which we interact comfortably with other individuals. During the COVID-19 pandemic, keeping larger IPS than usual, along with wearing a face mask, is one of the most effective measures to slow down the COVID-19 outbreak. Here, we explore the contribution of actual and perceived risk of contagion and anxiety levels in regulating our preferred social distance from other people during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. In this study, 1293 individuals from six Italian regions with different levels of actual risk of infection participated in an online survey assessing their perceived risk to be infected, level of anxiety and IPS. Two tasks were adopted as measures of interpersonal distance: the Interpersonal Visual Analogue Scale and a questionnaire evaluating interpersonal distance with and without face mask. The results showed that the IPS regulation was affected by how people subjectively perceived COVID-19 risk and the related level of anxiety, not by actual objective risk. This clarifies that the role of threat in prompting avoidant behaviors expressed in increased IPS does not merely reflect environmental events but rather how they are subjectively experienced and represented.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; anxiety; interpersonal space; risk perception; social distancing

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34063754     DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18115504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  8 in total

1.  The COVID-19 Stress Perceived on Social Distance and Gender-Based Implications.

Authors:  Paolo Taurisano; Tiziana Lanciano; Federica Alfeo; Francesca Bisceglie; Alessia Monaco; Filomena Leonela Sbordone; Chiara Abbatantuono; Silvia Costadura; Jolanda Losole; Gennaro Ruggiero; Santa Iachini; Luigi Vimercati; Angelo Vacca; Maria Fara De Caro; Antonietta Curci
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-09

2.  Assessing Interpersonal Proximity Evaluation in the COVID-19 Era: Evidence From the Affective Priming Task.

Authors:  Elisa Scerrati; Stefania D'Ascenzo; Roberto Nicoletti; Caterina Villani; Luisa Lugli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-16

3.  Space at home and psychological distress during the Covid-19 lockdown in Italy.

Authors:  Ferdinando Fornara; Oriana Mosca; Andrea Bosco; Alessandro O Caffò; Antonella Lopez; Tina Iachini; Gennaro Ruggiero; Francesco Ruotolo; Filomena Leonela Sbordone; Antonella Ferrara; Zaira Cattaneo; Maria Arioli; Francesca Frassinetti; Michela Candini; Laura Miola; Francesca Pazzaglia
Journal:  J Environ Psychol       Date:  2021-12-13

4.  Face masks reduce interpersonal distance in virtual reality.

Authors:  Leon O H Kroczek; Stephanie Böhme; Andreas Mühlberger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Risk-Perception Change Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine's Side Effects: The Role of Individual Differences.

Authors:  Laura Colautti; Alice Cancer; Sara Magenes; Alessandro Antonietti; Paola Iannello
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Personal space increases during the COVID-19 pandemic in response to real and virtual humans.

Authors:  Daphne J Holt; Sarah L Zapetis; Baktash Babadi; Jordan Zimmerman; Roger B H Tootell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-14

7.  Effect of Public Empathy with Infection-Control Guidelines on Infection-Prevention Attitudes and Behaviors: Based on the Case of COVID-19.

Authors:  Eugene Song; Jae-Eun Lee; Seola Kwon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Psychological and physiological evidence for an initial 'Rough Sketch' calculation of personal space.

Authors:  Roger B H Tootell; Sarah L Zapetis; Baktash Babadi; Zahra Nasiriavanaki; Dylan E Hughes; Kim Mueser; Michael Otto; Ed Pace-Schott; Daphne J Holt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.