Literature DB >> 3406371

Cell-cycle-dependent repair of potentially lethal damage in the XR-1 gamma-ray-sensitive Chinese hamster ovary cell.

T D Stamato1, A Dipatri, A Giaccia.   

Abstract

Repair of potentially lethal damage (PLD) was investigated in a gamma-ray-sensitive Chinese hamster cell mutant, XR-1, and its parent by comparing survival of plateau-phase cells plated immediately after irradiation with cells plated after a delay. Previous work indicated that XR-1 cells are deficient in repair of double-strand DNA breaks and are gamma-ray sensitive in G1 but have near normal sensitivity and repair capacity in late S phase. At irradiation doses from 0 to 1.0 Gy (100 to 10% survival), the delayed- and immediate-plating survival curves of XR-1 cells were identical; however, at doses greater than 1.0 Gy a significant increase in survival was observed when plating was delayed (PLD repair), approaching a 20-fold increase at 8 Gy. Elimination of S-phase cells by [3H]thymidine suicide dramatically increased gamma-ray sensitivity of plateau-phase XR-1 mutant cells and reduced by 600-fold the number of cells capable of PLD repair after a 6-Gy dose. In contrast, elimination of S-phase cells in plateau-phase parental cells did not alter PLD repair. These results suggest that the majority of PLD repair observed in plateau-phase XR-1 cells occurs in S-phase cells while G1 cells perform little PLD repair. In contrast, G1 cells account for the majority of PLD repair in plateau-phase parental cells. Thus, in the XR-1 mutant, a cell's ability to repair PLD seems to depend upon the stage of the cell cycle at which the irradiation is delivered. A possible explanation for these findings is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3406371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  10 in total

1.  Cell cycle control of telomere protection and NHEJ revealed by a ts mutation in the DNA-binding domain of TRF2.

Authors:  Akimitsu Konishi; Titia de Lange
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Homologous recombination and non-homologous end-joining pathways of DNA double-strand break repair have overlapping roles in the maintenance of chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells.

Authors:  M Takata; M S Sasaki; E Sonoda; C Morrison; M Hashimoto; H Utsumi; Y Yamaguchi-Iwai; A Shinohara; S Takeda
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  The rejoining of double-strand breaks in DNA by human cell extracts.

Authors:  P North; A Ganesh; J Thacker
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Human chromosome 5 complements the DNA double-strand break-repair deficiency and gamma-ray sensitivity of the XR-1 hamster variant.

Authors:  A J Giaccia; N Denko; R MacLaren; D Mirman; C Waldren; I Hart; T D Stamato
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  The breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA2: at the crossroads between DNA replication and recombination?

Authors:  A R Venkitaraman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-02-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Hypersensitivity of Ku80-deficient cell lines and mice to DNA damage: the effects of ionizing radiation on growth, survival, and development.

Authors:  A Nussenzweig; K Sokol; P Burgman; L Li; G C Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  DNA repair by nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination during cell cycle in human cells.

Authors:  Zhiyong Mao; Michael Bozzella; Andrei Seluanov; Vera Gorbunova
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 8.  Behind the wheel and under the hood: functions of cyclin-dependent kinases in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Lara Wohlbold; Robert P Fisher
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-05-22

9.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae LIF1: a function involved in DNA double-strand break repair related to mammalian XRCC4.

Authors:  G Herrmann; T Lindahl; P Schär
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Limiting the persistence of a chromosome break diminishes its mutagenic potential.

Authors:  Nicole Bennardo; Amanda Gunn; Anita Cheng; Paul Hasty; Jeremy M Stark
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 5.917

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.