| Literature DB >> 34063427 |
Giuseppe Sarli1, Carolina Castagnetti1,2, Carlo Bianco1, Giulia Ballotta1, Giorgia Tura1, Martina Caporaletti3, Marco Cunto1, Giancarlo Avallone1, Cinzia Benazzi1, Fabio Ostanello1, Daniele Zambelli1.
Abstract
Placenta is essential for the development of the fetus, and its impaired function can lead to a negative outcome (i.e., neonatal mortality). In dogs, investigations on placenta histology and neonatal outcome in healthy bitches are lacking, and a contribution is provided in this study to emphasize the use of placenta histology in practice. Fifty-one placentas from 11 litters were collected during cesarean section, classified according to the litter size (large (L) or small (S)) and the outcome, this latter as healthy (Group 1) or dead within 7 days (Group 2). The placenta/puppy weight ratio (PPR) was calculated, and specimens were formalin-fixed and paraffin-wax embedded, and on the resulting histological slides, capillary density (CD) was quantified. Among necrosis, calcification, and intravascular leucocytes, only the presence of multifocal-confluent necrosis (significantly more frequent in Group 2) was associated with a higher risk of death within 7 days (odds ratio = 30.7). Mixed logistic regression ruled out the effect on death both of a bitch and cesarean type (programmed vs. emergency). PPR and CD values were associated with litter size; large litters had lower PPR (p < 0.01) and higher CD (p < 0.05) than small litters. The relationship between PPR and CD was negative and significant (p < 0.01). Necrosis was a frequent finding in canine placentas, but only when multifocal-confluent was it associated with a poor outcome. The litter size influenced PPR (lower in L) and CD (higher in L), and this is likely due to the plasticity of placenta adaptation.Entities:
Keywords: capillary density; dog; histology; litter size; necrosis; placenta
Year: 2021 PMID: 34063427 PMCID: PMC8157207 DOI: 10.3390/ani11051418
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Clinical data collected for each litter and litter size (S: small; L: large).
| Litter | Breed | Weight (Kg) | Age (Years) | No. of Pregnancy | Number of Puppies | Examined Placenta 1 | Litter Size | Breed Mean Litter Size | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Group 1 | Group 2 | ||||||||
| 1 | Shetland Sheepdog | 6.5 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | S | 3.9 a |
| 2 | Boxer | 35.8 | - | - | 11 | 9 | 2 | 11 | L | 6.6 a |
| 3 | Pyrenean Mountain Dog | 46.0 | 5 | 2 | 5 c | 1 | 2 | 3 | S | 7.0 b |
| 4 | Maremma sheepdog | - | 7 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | S | 7.0 b |
| 5 | Chihuahua | 1.8 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | S | 3.2 a |
| 6 | Boston Terrier | 8.3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | S | 4.1 a |
| 7 | Mongrel | 4.2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | S | 3.0 b |
| 8 | Labrador | 51.0 | 7 | 2 | 12 d | 3 | - | 3 | L | 6.9 a |
| 9 | French Buldog | 11.8 | 3 | 2 | 8 e | 4 | 3 | 7 | L | 4.7 a |
| 10 | French Bullgog | 10 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 7 | L | 4.7 a |
| 11 | Bull Terrier | 26 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 | L | 5.5 a |
a Litter numerosity compared with reference values described by Borges et al. [22]; b Litter size as estimated on the basis of life body weight of the breed and criterion of affinity with other breeds belonging to the same morphological group according to the Fédération Cynologique Internationale (http://www.fci.be/en/nomenclature, accessed on 27 March 2021); S: small; L: large. Number of puppies born dead not included in the caseload: c 2 puppies; d 4 puppies; e 1 puppy; 1 the weight was available and the PPR calculated only for 43 out of the 50 placentas.
Figure 1(a) Median and quartile range of PPR in small (S) and large (L) litters. (b) Mean and SD of CD in small (S) and large (L) litters. (c) Relationship between PPR and CD.
Figure 2Placenta histological findings: (a) puppy of Group 1: focal necrosis of lamellae (asterisk); bar: 100 µm. (b) puppy of Group 2: large area of necrosis and hemorrhage. Bar 100 µm. (c) puppy of Group 2: highlights of vessel thrombosis (asterisk) in a necrotic lamella surrounded by a single layer of karyorrhectic trophoblasts (arrow); bar: 20 µm. (d) puppy of Group 2: necrosis of maternal vessels and intravascular karyorrhectic debris (asterisk); bar 50 µm. (e) puppy of Group 1: example of microfocal calcification (arrow) within a trophoblastic lamella; bar: 50 µm. (f) puppy of Group 2: linear pattern of mineralization, stained in red; bar: 200 µm. (g) puppy of Group 2: scattered, fragmented basophilic granular material embedded in mature collagen; bar: 50 µm. (a–e and g): hematoxylin-eosin stain; f: alizarin red stain for calcium.
Synopsis of major histopathological findings in placenta within outcome Groups.
| Major Histopathological Findings | Group 1 | Group 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Necrosis | focal | 13/43 (30.2) | 2/8 (25.0) | <0.05 |
| multifocal-confluent | 5/43 (11.6) | 5/8 (62.5) | ||
| absent | 25/43 (58.2) | 1/8 (12.5) | ||
| Intravascular leukocytes | present | 7/43 (16.3) | 1/8 (12.5) | >0.05 |
| absent | 36/43 (83.7) | 7/8 (87.5) | ||
| Calcification | focal | 24/43 (55.8) | 2/8 (25.0) | <0.05 |
| linear and sclerotic | 0/43 (0.0) | 4/8 (50.0) | ||
| absent | 19/43 (44.2) | 2/8 (25.0) | ||
Results of mixed logistic regression analysis.
| Model Term | OR | 95% Confidence Interval for OR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elective cesarean | 4.682 | 0.001–11,425.246 | 0.651 |
| Large litter size | 0.976 | 0.002–1039.957 | 0.993 |
| Necrosis absent or focal | 30.682 | 1.805–1032.549 | 0.049 |
| Calcification pattern absent | 0.101 | 0.004–2.183 | 0.139 |
| Capillary density lower than the median value (14.6) | 2.162 | 0.112–47.055 | 0.609 |
| PPR lower than the median value (13.6) | 0.414 | 0.001–206.851 | 0.765 |
| APGAR ≥ 7 | 0.659 | 0.045–8.914 | 0.748 |
| Intercept | 1.482 | 0.003–502.057 | 0.892 |