| Literature DB >> 34063070 |
Michaela Komáromyová1,2, Dominika Mravčáková3, Daniel Petrič3, Katarína Kucková3, Michal Babják1, Michaela Urda Dolinská1, Alžbeta Königová1, Michaela Maďarová3, Ewa Pruszyńska-Oszmałek4, Adam Cieslak5, Klaudia Čobanová3, Zora Váradyová3, Marián Várady1.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the effect of traditional medicinal plants typical to Central Europe as well as organic selenium on increasing the resistance of lambs to gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) infection with Haemonchus contortus. 21 female lambs were infected with third-stage larvae of H. contortus on the day (D) 0 and re-infected on D49 and D77. The animals were divided into three groups based on a treatment diet: a basal diet (control), a diet enriched with dry plants (Herbmix), and a diet enriched with selenized yeast (Selplex). The number of eggs per gram (EPG) of feces was quantified on D21, D28, D35, D42, D49, D56, D63, D70, D77, D84, D91, D98, D105, D112, and D119. The mean reductions in EPG on D28 were 43.4 and 28.6% for Selplex and Herbmix, respectively. The reduction in egg output was nearly uniform throughout the experiment for Selplex. However, for Herbmix the mean reduction was only 19.8% up to D91 and 46.1% after D91. Glutathione peroxidase activity in the blood from D35 to D98 was two to three-fold higher for Selplex than the other groups. Both supplements slowed the dynamics of GIN infection and gradually increased the resistance of lambs against ovine haemonchosis.Entities:
Keywords: Haemonchus contortus; Se-yeast; antioxidants; parasitological status; plant nutraceuticals; thyroxine; triiodothyronine; vitamin E
Year: 2021 PMID: 34063070 PMCID: PMC8147918 DOI: 10.3390/ani11051319
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Chemical compositions of the dietary substrates.
| Dietary Substrate | DM | NDF | ADF | CP | N | Ash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meadow hay | 917 | 675 | 445 | 74 | 12 | 68 |
| Concentrate | 899 | 263 | 145 | 261 | 42 | 124 |
| Selplex | 898 | 238 | 137 | 262 | 42 | 146 |
| Herbmix | 908 | 346 | 326 | 161 | 26 | 116 |
DM, dry matter; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acidic detergent fiber; CP, crude protein; N, nitrogen.
Chemical compositions of the aqueous and ethanolic herbal extracts.
| Plant Species | Tannins | Saponins | Alkaloids | Terpenoids | Flavonoids | Steroids |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| − | − | − | + | + | − |
|
| − | + | − | − | − | + |
|
| − | + | − | + | − | + |
|
| + | − | − | + | − | + |
|
| + | − | + | − | + | + |
|
| − | − | − | + | − | + |
|
| + | + | − | − | − | + |
|
| + | − | − | + | + | − |
|
| − | − | + | − | − | − |
| Herbmix | + | + | + | + | + | + |
+, phytochemicals present; −, phytochemicals not present.
Body weight (BW) and mean live-weight gain (LWG) of the experimental lambs (n = 7).
| Day | Control | Herbmix | Selplex | SD | Significance of Effects | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | Time | T × Time | ||||||
| BW | 0 | 18.7 | 18.1 | 18.8 | 2.26 | 0.559 | 0.001 | 0.999 |
| 35 | 22.7 | 22.3 | 22.4 | 2.74 | ||||
| 63 | 25.5 | 24.9 | 24.7 | 2.96 | ||||
| 98 | 27.4 | 26.9 | 26.5 | 3.15 | ||||
| LWG | 35 | 4.09 | 4.21 | 3.59 | 0.792 | 0.613 | 0.001 | 0.494 |
| 63 | 2.81 | 2.60 | 2.34 | 0.742 | ||||
| 98 | 1.86 | 1.93 | 1.73 | 1.075 | ||||
T, treatment; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 1Fecal egg counts (mean ± SD) for the groups of lambs infected with H. contortus. *, ** Herbmix and # Selpex group differed significantly from control group (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01). The re-infection was on D49 and D77.
Figure 2Abomasal worm counts (number ± SD) of H. contortus in the lambs of each treatment at the end of the experiment on day 119 (p > 0.05).
Hematological parameters of the experimental lambs (n = 7).
| Item | Day | Control | Herbmix | Selplex | SD | Significance of Effects | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | Time | T × Time | ||||||
| RBC | 0 | 12.1 | 12.3 | 12.5 | 0.68 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 1.000 |
| (T/L) | 15 | 11.4 | 11.4 | 12.0 | 0.88 | |||
| 35 | 9.18 | 9.17 | 10.2 | 1.31 | ||||
| 49 | 8.57 | 8.38 | 9.53 | 1.32 | ||||
| 63 | 8.24 | 8.40 | 9.43 | 1.41 | ||||
| 77 | 7.83 | 8.08 | 8.93 | 1.41 | ||||
| 98 | 7.04 | 6.98 | 7.78 | 1.84 | ||||
| 112 | 6.91 | 7.14 | 7.62 | 1.91 | ||||
| HGB | 0 | 125 | 120 | 120 | 8.47 | 0.088 | 0.001 | 0.977 |
| (g/L) | 15 | 110 | 109 | 113 | 7.01 | |||
| 35 | 90.3 | 92.9 | 95.8 | 9.92 | ||||
| 49 | 87.9 | 88.1 | 89.5 | 11.7 | ||||
| 63 | 80.8 | 86.1 | 87.2 | 14.9 | ||||
| 77 | 79.1 | 83.5 | 85.2 | 14.3 | ||||
| 98 | 69.3 | 71.4 | 74.5 | 20.7 | ||||
| 112 | 63.6 | 70.5 | 73.6 | 22.3 | ||||
| HCT | 0 | 0.255 | 0.262 | 0.247 | 0.013 | 0.197 | 0.001 | 1.000 |
| (g/L) | 15 | 0.240 | 0.243 | 0.237 | 0.011 | |||
| 35 | 0.216 | 0.226 | 0.216 | 0.018 | ||||
| 49 | 0.213 | 0.216 | 0.206 | 0.023 | ||||
| 63 | 0.198 | 0.214 | 0.204 | 0.030 | ||||
| 77 | 0.197 | 0.210 | 0.204 | 0.027 | ||||
| 98 | 0.173 | 0.181 | 0.178 | 0.043 | ||||
| 112 | 0.162 | 0.181 | 0.178 | 0.046 | ||||
| MCV | 0 | 21.0 | 21.3 | 19.8 | 1.30 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.932 |
| (fL) | 15 | 23.7 | 21.5 | 19.8 | 1.32 | |||
| 35 | 25.1 | 24.9 | 21.6 | 2.43 | ||||
| 49 | 25.1 | 26.0 | 21.9 | 2.59 | ||||
| 63 | 24.1 | 25.7 | 21.8 | 2.39 | ||||
| 77 | 25.2 | 26.2 | 23.2 | 2.61 | ||||
| 98 | 24.4 | 26.3 | 23.0 | 2.83 | ||||
| 112 | 23.3 | 25.5 | 23.5 | 2.53 | ||||
RBC, red blood cell; HGB, hemoglobin; HCT, hematocrit; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; T, treatment; SD, standard deviation.
α-Tocopherol (vitamin E) concentration in the sera of the experimental lambs (n = 7).
| Item | Day | Control | Herbmix | Selplex | SD | Significance of Effects ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | Time | T × Time | ||||||
| α-Tocopherol | 0 | 1.031 | 1.286 | 1.164 | 0.0041 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| 35 | 1.035 | 1.388 | 1.178 | 0.6016 | ||||
| 63 | 1.079 | 1.211 | 1.221 | 0.2820 | ||||
| 98 | 1.417 | 1.508 | 1.273 | 0.4155 | ||||
T, treatment; SD, standard deviation.
Antioxidant status of the experimental lambs (n = 7).
| Item | Day | Control | Herbmix | Selplex | SD | Significance of Effects | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | Time | T × Time | ||||||
| GPx | 0 | 412.3 | 440.6 | 400.7 | 66.26 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| (U/g Hb) | 35 | 420.3 | 465.9 | 742.7 | 159.8 | |||
| 63 | 349.4 | 384.0 | 813.2 | 228.3 | ||||
| 98 | 259.6 | 289.3 | 795.2 | 256.4 | ||||
| MDA | 0 | 0.256 | 0.275 | 0.273 | 0.037 | 0.132 | 0.001 | 0.666 |
| (µmol/L) | 35 | 0.306 | 0.271 | 0.301 | 0.047 | |||
| 63 | 0.230 | 0.205 | 0.239 | 0.039 | ||||
| 98 | 0.243 | 0.207 | 0.225 | 0.039 | ||||
| TAC | 0 | 0.663 | 0.678 | 0.690 | 0.030 | 0.115 | 0.001 | 0.980 |
| (mmol/L) | 35 | 0.667 | 0.659 | 0.681 | 0.036 | |||
| 63 | 0.433 | 0.429 | 0.453 | 0.040 | ||||
| 98 | 0.439 | 0.434 | 0.449 | 0.039 | ||||
GPx, glutathione peroxidase; Hb, hemoglobin; MDA, malondialdehyde; TAC, total antioxidant capacity; T, treatment; SD, standard deviation.
Concentrations of thyroid hormones of the experimental lambs (n = 7).
| Day | Control | Herbmix | Selplex | SD | Significance of Effects | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | Time | T × Time | ||||||
| T3 | 35 | 0.604 | 1.44 | 1.57 | 0.849 | |||
| 63 | 0.529 | 1.04 | 1.27 | 0.784 | 0.001 | 0.144 | 0.021 | |
| 98 | 0.201 | 0.074 | 1.96 | 1.12 | ||||
| T4 | 35 | 62.9 | 72.1 | 79.7 | 20.2 | |||
| 63 | 60.2 | 59.0 | 69.7 | 19.0 | 0.047 | 0.020 | 0.849 | |
| 98 | 51.9 | 46.5 | 65.4 | 18.3 | ||||
| T3:T4 | 35 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.010 | |||
| 63 | 0.009 | 0.018 | 0.018 | 0.011 | 0.001 | 0.230 | 0.004 | |
| 98 | 0.004 | 0.002 | 0.03 | 0.015 | ||||
T3, triiodothyronine; T4, thyroxine; T, treatment; SD, standard deviation.