| Literature DB >> 34062948 |
Hong Jae Cheon1, Quynh Huong Nguyen1, Moon Il Kim1.
Abstract
Inspired by the active site structure of natural horseradish peroxidase having iron as a pivotal element with coordinated histidine residues, we have developed histidine coated magnetic nanoparticles (His@MNPs) with relatively uniform and small sizes (less than 10 nm) through one-pot heat treatment. In comparison to pristine MNPs and other amino acid coated MNPs, His@MNPs exhibited a considerably enhanced peroxidase-imitating activity, approaching 10-fold higher in catalytic reactions. With the high activity, His@MNPs then were exploited to detect the important neurotransmitter acetylcholine. By coupling choline oxidase and acetylcholine esterase with His@MNPs as peroxidase mimics, target choline and acetylcholine were successfully detected via fluorescent mode with high specificity and sensitivity with the limits of detection down to 200 and 100 nM, respectively. The diagnostic capability of the method is demonstrated by analyzing acetylcholine in human blood serum. This study thus demonstrates the potential of utilizing His@MNPs as peroxidase-mimicking nanozymes for detecting important biological and clinical targets with high sensitivity and reliability.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; acetylcholine detection; histidine coated magnetic nanoparticles; nanozyme; peroxidase mimics
Year: 2021 PMID: 34062948 PMCID: PMC8147487 DOI: 10.3390/nano11051207
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Scheme 1Schematic illustration of ACh detection utilizing multiple enzymes and peroxidase-mimicking His@MNPs.
Figure 1TEM analysis of (a) His@MNPs and (b) MNPs. (c) EDS analysis with the TEM images of His@MNPs.
Figure 2Investigation for the peroxidase-like activities of various amino acids coated MNPs and pristine MNPs. In the real image, the order is corresponding to the order of graph from top to bottom.
Figure 3Steady-state kinetic assays of (a) His@MNPs and (b) pristine MNPs with TMB as substrate and their corresponding double reciprocal (Lineweaver-Burk) plots of activity. H2O2 substrate was used in the steady-state kinetic assays performed by (c) His@MNPs and (d) pristine MNPs.
Comparison of kinetic constants of His@MNPs, pristine MNPs, HRP, and other peroxidase-mimicking nanozymes with H2O2 and TMB. Km is the Michaelis-Menten constant, kcat is derived from kcat = Vmax/[E], where Vmax is the maximal reaction velocity, and [E] is the iron concentration measured by ICP-AES.
| Substrate | [E] | Vmax
| Km
| kcat
| Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL-101(Fe) | TMB | - | 1.0083 | 0.585 | - | [ |
| H2O2 | - | 0.5138 | 1.89 | - | ||
| BSA-Cu3(PO4)2 nanoflower | TMB | - | 0.099 | 0.1709 | - | [ |
| H2O2 | - | 0.063 | 1.00 | - | ||
| HRP | TMB | 2.5 × 10−11 | 0.1 | 0.434 | 4 × 103 | [ |
| H2O2 | 2.5 × 10−11 | 0.087 | 3.70 | 3.48 × 103 | ||
| NSP-carbon quantum dot | TMB | - | 0.188 | 0.47 | - | [ |
| H2O2 | - | 69.50 | 32.61 | - | ||
| FeS2/SiO2 | TMB | - | 0.31 | 0.948 | 2.22 | [ |
| H2O2 | - | 1.181 | 0.0126 | 1.29 | ||
| MNP | TMB | 9.7 × 10−6 | 0.18 | 0.142 | 1.88 | This work |
| H2O2 | 9.7 × 10−6 | 567.83 | 689.38 | 5.9 × 104 | ||
| His@MNP | TMB | 9.7 × 10−6 | 0.51 | 0.149 | 5.29 | This work |
| H2O2 | 9.7 × 10−6 | 676.45 | 381.62 | 3.9 × 104 |
Figure 4Fluorescence spectra for detecting free hydroxyl (·OH) radicals produced during the peroxidase-mediated decomposition of H2O2, utilizing TA as a probe.
Figure 5Dose-response curve for the detection of (a) choline and (b) ACh with their corresponding linear calibration plots using His@MNPs based assay. (c) Selectivity of His@MNPs based assay towards ACh. In the assay, concentration of ACh is 10 µM while other interfering substances are all 100 µM.
Detection precision of the His@MNPs based assay for the determination of ACh levels in spiked human serum sample.
| Sample | Added Value (μM) | Measured Value a (μM) | SD b | CV c (%) | Recovery d (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 3.01 | 0.23 | 7.54 | 100.20 |
| 2 | 5 | 5.07 | 0.06 | 1.16 | 101.47 |
| 3 | 8 | 8.15 | 0.31 | 3.85 | 101.92 |
a The average value of six independent measurements. b The standard deviation (SD) of six successive measurements. c Coefficient of variation. d Recovery = (Measured value/Expected value) × 100.