Literature DB >> 34062004

Selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone in previously treated multiple myeloma: Outcomes by cytogenetic risk.

Shambavi Richard1, Ajai Chari1, Sosana Delimpasi2, Maryana Simonova3, Ivan Spicka4, Ludek Pour5, Iryna Kriachok6, Meletios A Dimopoulos7, Halyna Pylypenko8, Holger W Auner9, Xavier Leleu10, Ganna Usenko11, Roman Hajek12, Reuben Benjamin13, Tuphan Kanti Dolai14, Dinesh Kumar Sinha15, Christopher P Venner16, Mamta Garg17, Don Ambrose Stevens18, Hang Quach19, Sundar Jagannath1, Phillipe Moreau20, Moshe Levy21, Ashraf Badros22, Larry D Anderson23, Nizar J Bahlis24, Thierry Facon25, Maria Victoria Mateos26, Michele Cavo27, Hua Chang28, Yosef Landesman28, Yi Chai28, Melina Arazy28, Jatin Shah28, Sharon Shacham28, Michael G Kauffman28, Sebastian Grosicki29, Paul G Richardson30.   

Abstract

In the phase 3 BOSTON study, patients with multiple myeloma (MM) after 1-3 prior regimens were randomized to once-weekly selinexor (an oral inhibitor of exportin 1 [XPO1]) plus bortezomib-dexamethasone (XVd) or twice-weekly bortezomib-dexamethasone (Vd). Compared with Vd, XVd was associated with significant improvements in median progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and lower rates of peripheral neuropathy, with trends in overall survival (OS) favoring XVd. In BOSTON, 141 (35.1%) patients had MM with high-risk (presence of del[17p], t[4;14], t[14;16], or ≥4 copies of amp1q21) cytogenetics (XVd, n = 70; Vd, n = 71), and 261 (64.9%) exhibited standard-risk cytogenetics (XVd, n = 125; Vd, n = 136). Among patients with high-risk MM, median PFS was 12.91 months for XVd and 8.61 months for Vd (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, (0.4673, 1.1406)], p = 0.082), and ORRs were 78.6% and 57.7%, respectively (OR 2.68; p = 0.004). In the standard-risk subgroup, median PFS was 16.62 months for XVd and 9.46 months for Vd (HR 0.61; p = 0.004), and ORRs were 75.2% and 64.7%, respectively (OR 1.65; p = 0.033). The safety profiles of XVd and Vd in both subgroups were consistent with the overall population. These data suggest that selinexor can confer benefits to patients with MM regardless of cytogenetic risk. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03110562.
© 2021 The Authors. American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34062004     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  4 in total

Review 1.  The molecular mechanism and challenge of targeting XPO1 in treatment of relapsed and refractory myeloma.

Authors:  Mark Sellin; Stephanie Berg; Patrick Hagen; Jiwang Zhang
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.803

Review 2.  MYC inhibitors in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Sandra Martínez-Martín; Laura Soucek
Journal:  Cancer Drug Resist       Date:  2021-08-13

3.  A Case Report of a 58-Year-Old Woman with a Diagnosis of High-Risk Myeloma Refractory to Multiple Line of Therapy and Treated with Selinexor, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone Prior to Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Michael Cass; Andrew B McDonald; Osnat Ben-Shahar; Yosef Landesman; Trinayan Kashyap
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-21

Review 4.  Revisiting Proteasome Inhibitors: Molecular Underpinnings of Their Development, Mechanisms of Resistance and Strategies to Overcome Anti-Cancer Drug Resistance.

Authors:  Carlota Leonardo-Sousa; Andreia Neves Carvalho; Romina A Guedes; Pedro M P Fernandes; Natália Aniceto; Jorge A R Salvador; Maria João Gama; Rita C Guedes
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.