| Literature DB >> 34061821 |
Jane Melville1,2,3, David G Chapple3, J Scott Keogh4, Joanna Sumner1, Andrew Amey5, Phil Bowles6, Ian G Brennan4, Patrick Couper5, Stephen C Donnellan7, Paul Doughty8, Danielle L Edwards9, Ryan J Ellis8,10, Damien Esquerré4, Jéssica Fenker4, Michael G Gardner7,11, Arthur Georges12, Margaret L Haines1, Conrad J Hoskin13, Mark Hutchinson7, Craig Moritz4, James Nankivell14, Paul Oliver5,15, Carlos J Pavón-Vázquez4, Mitzy Pepper4, Daniel L Rabosky16, Kate Sanders14, Glenn Shea17,18, Sonal Singhal19, Jessica Worthington Wilmer5, Reid Tingley3.
Abstract
Global biodiversity loss is a profound consequence of human activity. Disturbingly, biodiversity loss is greater than realized because of the unknown number of undocumented species. Conservation fundamentally relies on taxonomic recognition of species, but only a fraction of biodiversity is described. Here, we provide a new quantitative approach for prioritizing rigorous taxonomic research for conservation. We implement this approach in a highly diverse vertebrate group-Australian lizards and snakes. Of 870 species assessed, we identified 282 (32.4%) with taxonomic uncertainty, of which 17.6% likely comprise undescribed species of conservation concern. We identify 24 species in need of immediate taxonomic attention to facilitate conservation. Using a broadly applicable return-on-investment framework, we demonstrate the importance of prioritizing the fundamental work of identifying species before they are lost.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34061821 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001210
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Biol ISSN: 1544-9173 Impact factor: 8.029