Literature DB >> 34061232

In vitro screening and in vivo colonization pilot model of Lactobacillus plantarum LP5 and Campylobacter coli DSPV 458 in mice.

M J Ruiz1,2, M V Zbrun1,3, M L Signorini3,4, J A Zimmermann1,3, L P Soto1,3, M R Rosmini3, L S Frizzo5,6.   

Abstract

The objective of this work was to determine the antibacterial effect of Lactobacillus plantarum strains of pork origin against Campylobacter coli strains, and to conduct experimental colonization pilot models in mice for both microorganisms. Inhibition assays allowed evaluation and selection of L. plantarum LP5 as the strain with the highest antagonistic activity against C. coli and with the best potential to be used in in vivo study. Adult 6-week-old female Balb/cCmedc mice were lodged in two groups. The treated group was administered with 9.4 log10CFU/2 times/wk of L. plantarum LP5. L. plantarum LP5 was recovered from the feces and cecum of the inoculated mice. However, when bacteria stopped being administered, probiotic counts decreased. Experimental colonization with C. coli was carried out in five groups of mice. All animals were treated with antibiotics in their drinking water to weaken the indigenous microbiota and to allow colonization of C. coli. Four groups were administered once with different C. coli strains (DSPV458: 8.49 log10CFU; DSPV567: 8.09 log10CFU; DSPV570: 8.46 log10CFU; DSPV541: 8.86 log10CFU, respectively). After 8 h, mice inoculated with different C. coli strains were colonized because the pathogen was detected in their feces. L. plantarum LP5 tolerated the gastrointestinal conditions of murine model without generating adverse effects on the animals. C. coli DSPV458 colonized the mice without causing infection by lodging in their digestive tract, thus generating a reproducible colonization model. Both models combined could be used as protection murine models against pathogens to test alternative control tools to antibiotics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic alternative; Food-borne pathogen; Inhibition assays; Lactic acid bacteria; Pathogen challenge

Year:  2021        PMID: 34061232     DOI: 10.1007/s00203-021-02385-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Microbiol        ISSN: 0302-8933            Impact factor:   2.552


  21 in total

1.  Role of commercial probiotic strains against human pathogen adhesion to intestinal mucus.

Authors:  M C Collado; J Meriluoto; S Salminen
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.858

Review 2.  A systematic review of the safety of probiotics.

Authors:  Tina Didari; Sara Solki; Shilan Mozaffari; Shekoufeh Nikfar; Mohammad Abdollahi
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.250

3.  Removal of the cecum affects intestinal fermentation, enteric bacterial community structure, and acute colitis in mice.

Authors:  Kirsty Brown; D Wade Abbott; Richard R E Uwiera; G Douglas Inglis
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2018-03-13

4.  Lactic acid bacteria population dynamics during minced beef storage under aerobic or modified atmosphere packaging conditions.

Authors:  Agapi I Doulgeraki; Spiros Paramithiotis; Dafni Maria Kagkli; George-John E Nychas
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 5.516

5.  Campylobacter jejuni colonization of mice with limited enteric flora.

Authors:  Christopher Chang; Jeff F Miller
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Experimental infection of gnotobiotic mice with Campylobacter jejuni: colonisation of intestine and spread to lymphoid and reticulo-endothelial organs.

Authors:  J L Fauchère; M Véron; A Lellouch-Tubiana; A Pfister
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.472

7.  Novel murine infection models provide deep insights into the "ménage à trois" of Campylobacter jejuni, microbiota and host innate immunity.

Authors:  Stefan Bereswill; André Fischer; Rita Plickert; Lea-Maxie Haag; Bettina Otto; Anja A Kühl; Javid I Dasti; Javid I Dashti; Andreas E Zautner; Melba Muñoz; Christoph Loddenkemper; Uwe Gross; Ulf B Göbel; Markus M Heimesaat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Probiotic characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from swine intestine.

Authors:  K Balasingham; C Valli; L Radhakrishnan; D Balasuramanyam
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2017-07-27

9.  Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus isolates of chicken origin with anti-Campylobacter activity.

Authors:  Marta Dec; Anna Nowaczek; Renata Urban-Chmiel; Dagmara Stępień-Pyśniak; Andrzej Wernicki
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 1.267

10.  Use of Lactobacillus plantarum Strains as a Bio-Control Strategy against Food-Borne Pathogenic Microorganisms.

Authors:  Mattia Pia Arena; Amandine Silvain; Giovanni Normanno; Francesco Grieco; Djamel Drider; Giuseppe Spano; Daniela Fiocco
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.