Literature DB >> 34060885

The polarized mind in context: Interdisciplinary approaches to the psychology of political polarization.

Jeroen M van Baar1, Oriel FeldmanHall1.   

Abstract

Existing research into the psychological roots of political polarization centers around two main approaches: one studying cognitive traits that predict susceptibility to holding polarized beliefs and one studying contextual influences that spread and reinforce polarized attitudes. Although both accounts have made valuable progress, political polarization is neither a purely cognitive trait nor a contextual issue. We argue that a new approach aiming to uncover interactions between cognition and context will be fruitful for understanding how polarization arises. Furthermore, recent developments in neuroimaging methods can overcome long-standing issues of measurement and ecological validity to critically help identify in which psychological processing steps-e.g., attention, semantic understanding, emotion-polarization takes hold. This interdisciplinary research agenda can thereby provide new avenues for interventions against the political polarization that plagues democracies around the world. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34060885      PMCID: PMC8630091          DOI: 10.1037/amp0000814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Psychol        ISSN: 0003-066X


  90 in total

Review 1.  Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities.

Authors:  John T Jost; Christopher M Federico; Jaime L Napier
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition.

Authors:  Edward Vul; Christine Harris; Piotr Winkielman; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-05

3.  Just above Chance: Is It Harder to Decode Information from Prefrontal Cortex Hemodynamic Activity Patterns?

Authors:  Apoorva Bhandari; Christopher Gagne; David Badre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Same Story, Different Story.

Authors:  Yaara Yeshurun; Stephen Swanson; Erez Simony; Janice Chen; Christina Lazaridi; Christopher J Honey; Uri Hasson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-01-01

5.  Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling.

Authors:  T Gilovich
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1983-06

6.  Hidden resilience and adaptive dynamics of the global online hate ecology.

Authors:  N F Johnson; R Leahy; N Johnson Restrepo; N Velasquez; M Zheng; P Manrique; P Devkota; S Wuchty
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Seeing What You Feel: Affect Drives Visual Perception of Structurally Neutral Faces.

Authors:  Erika H Siegel; Jolie B Wormwood; Karen S Quigley; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-02-27

8.  Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts.

Authors:  Jeffrey Lees; Mina Cikara
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-11-11

Review 9.  The Partisan Brain: An Identity-Based Model of Political Belief.

Authors:  Jay J Van Bavel; Andrea Pereira
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Dandelions, tulips and orchids: evidence for the existence of low-sensitive, medium-sensitive and high-sensitive individuals.

Authors:  Francesca Lionetti; Arthur Aron; Elaine N Aron; G Leonard Burns; Jadzia Jagiellowicz; Michael Pluess
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 6.222

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Framework on Polarization, Cognitive Inflexibility, and Rigid Cognitive Specialization.

Authors:  James Shyan-Tau Wu; Christoph Hauert; Claire Kremen; Jiaying Zhao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.