Ishita Sen1, Parul Thakral2, Priya Tiwari3, Vineet Pant2, Subha Shankar Das2, Divya Manda2, Vinod Raina3. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fortis Memorial Research Institute, Gurugram, Haryana, 122002, India. Ishita.sen@fortishealthcare.com. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fortis Memorial Research Institute, Gurugram, Haryana, 122002, India. 3. Department of Medical Oncology, Fortis Memorial Research Institute, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: 225Ac-PSMA-617 therapy has shown good response in many recent studies. We report our experience of targeted alpha therapy with 225Ac-PSMA-617 in mCRPC patients who have failed therapy with taxanes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with CRPC with progressive disease following at least one taxane-based chemotherapy received 225Ac-PSMA-617 between July 2017 and Nov 2019. Primary end point was a composite 50% PSA and radiological response. Secondary endpoints were PFS, OS, and changes in QOL. The differences in outcomes between patients with skeletal and lymph-node metastases versus those with visceral metastases were also studied. RESULTS: A composite response by predetermined criteria was observed in 25 (66%) of 38 patients. The median PFS was 8 months (95% CI 5.3-10.6 months). Median overall survival was 12 months (95% CI 9.1-14.9) with 16 patients alive at the time of censorship. There was no difference in response rates or survival statistics between patients with visceral metastases versus those with only bone and lymph-node metastases (Chi-square 1.51, df 1, Sig 0.218). The most common adverse effect was xerostomia. On the QOL Symptom score, Pain, Fatigue Insomnia, and constipation showed a significant improvement as compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: 225Ac-PSMA-617 is a safe and tolerable treatment option for mCRPC that demonstrates marked anti-tumour activity with improvement in quality of life even in patients of metastatic CRPC who have been previously treated with taxane-based chemotherapy.
OBJECTIVES:225Ac-PSMA-617 therapy has shown good response in many recent studies. We report our experience of targeted alpha therapy with 225Ac-PSMA-617 in mCRPC patients who have failed therapy with taxanes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with CRPC with progressive disease following at least one taxane-based chemotherapy received 225Ac-PSMA-617 between July 2017 and Nov 2019. Primary end point was a composite 50% PSA and radiological response. Secondary endpoints were PFS, OS, and changes in QOL. The differences in outcomes between patients with skeletal and lymph-node metastases versus those with visceral metastases were also studied. RESULTS: A composite response by predetermined criteria was observed in 25 (66%) of 38 patients. The median PFS was 8 months (95% CI 5.3-10.6 months). Median overall survival was 12 months (95% CI 9.1-14.9) with 16 patients alive at the time of censorship. There was no difference in response rates or survival statistics between patients with visceral metastases versus those with only bone and lymph-node metastases (Chi-square 1.51, df 1, Sig 0.218). The most common adverse effect was xerostomia. On the QOL Symptom score, Pain, Fatigue Insomnia, and constipation showed a significant improvement as compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS:225Ac-PSMA-617 is a safe and tolerable treatment option for mCRPC that demonstrates marked anti-tumour activity with improvement in quality of life even in patients of metastatic CRPC who have been previously treated with taxane-based chemotherapy.
Authors: Howard I Scher; Michael J Morris; Walter M Stadler; Celestia Higano; Ethan Basch; Karim Fizazi; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Tomasz M Beer; Michael A Carducci; Kim N Chi; Paul G Corn; Johann S de Bono; Robert Dreicer; Daniel J George; Elisabeth I Heath; Maha Hussain; Wm Kevin Kelly; Glenn Liu; Christopher Logothetis; David Nanus; Mark N Stein; Dana E Rathkopf; Susan F Slovin; Charles J Ryan; Oliver Sartor; Eric J Small; Matthew Raymond Smith; Cora N Sternberg; Mary-Ellen Taplin; George Wilding; Peter S Nelson; Lawrence H Schwartz; Susan Halabi; Philip W Kantoff; Andrew J Armstrong Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Matthias Eiber; Ken Herrmann; Jeremie Calais; Boris Hadaschik; Frederik L Giesel; Markus Hartenbach; Thomas Hope; Robert Reiter; Tobias Maurer; Wolfgang A Weber; Wolfgang P Fendler Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Johann Sebastian de Bono; Stephane Oudard; Mustafa Ozguroglu; Steinbjørn Hansen; Jean-Pascal Machiels; Ivo Kocak; Gwenaëlle Gravis; Istvan Bodrogi; Mary J Mackenzie; Liji Shen; Martin Roessner; Sunil Gupta; A Oliver Sartor Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-10-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Daniel P Petrylak; Catherine M Tangen; Maha H A Hussain; Primo N Lara; Jeffrey A Jones; Mary Ellen Taplin; Patrick A Burch; Donna Berry; Carol Moinpour; Manish Kohli; Mitchell C Benson; Eric J Small; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ian F Tannock; Ronald de Wit; William R Berry; Jozsef Horti; Anna Pluzanska; Kim N Chi; Stephane Oudard; Christine Théodore; Nicholas D James; Ingela Turesson; Mark A Rosenthal; Mario A Eisenberger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245