Literature DB >> 34059938

Genomic structural equation modelling provides a whole-system approach for the future crop breeding.

Tianhua He1, Tefera Tolera Angessa1, Camilla Beate Hill1, Xiao-Qi Zhang1, Kefei Chen2,3, Hao Luo1, Yonggang Wang1,4, Sakura D Karunarathne1, Gaofeng Zhou1,2, Cong Tan1, Penghao Wang1, Sharon Westcott2, Chengdao Li5,6,7.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Using genomic structural equation modelling, this research demonstrates an efficient way to identify genetically correlating traits and provides an effective proxy for multi-trait selection to consider the joint genetic architecture of multiple interacting traits in crop breeding. Breeding crop cultivars with optimal value across multiple traits has been a challenge, as traits may negatively correlate due to pleiotropy or genetic linkage. For example, grain yield and grain protein content correlate negatively with each other in cereal crops. Future crop breeding needs to be based on practical yet accurate evaluation and effective selection of beneficial trait to retain genes with the best agronomic score for multiple traits. Here, we test the framework of whole-system-based approach using structural equation modelling (SEM) to investigate how one trait affects others to guide the optimal selection of a combination of agronomically important traits. Using ten traits and genome-wide SNP profiles from a worldwide barley panel and SEM analysis, we revealed a network of interacting traits, in which tiller number contributes positively to both grain yield and protein content; we further identified common genetic factors affecting multiple traits in the network of interaction. Our method demonstrates an efficient way to identify genetically correlating traits and underlying pleiotropic genetic factors and provides an effective proxy for multi-trait selection within a whole-system framework that considers the joint genetic architecture of multiple interacting traits in crop breeding. Our findings suggest the promise of a whole-system approach to overcome challenges such as the negative correlation of grain yield and protein content to facilitating quantitative and objective breeding decisions in future crop breeding.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34059938     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-021-03865-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  27 in total

1.  Quantitative genetic models for describing simultaneous and recursive relationships between phenotypes.

Authors:  Daniel Gianola; Daniel Sorensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The genetic architecture of grain yield and related traits in Zea maize L. revealed by comparing intermated and conventional populations.

Authors:  Yung-Fen Huang; Delphine Madur; Valérie Combes; Chin Long Ky; Denis Coubriche; Philippe Jamin; Sophie Jouanne; Fabrice Dumas; Ellen Bouty; Pascal Bertin; Alain Charcosset; Laurence Moreau
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  LD Score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Brendan K Bulik-Sullivan; Po-Ru Loh; Hilary K Finucane; Stephan Ripke; Jian Yang; Nick Patterson; Mark J Daly; Alkes L Price; Benjamin M Neale
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Estimation of pleiotropy between complex diseases using single-nucleotide polymorphism-derived genomic relationships and restricted maximum likelihood.

Authors:  S H Lee; J Yang; M E Goddard; P M Visscher; N R Wray
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Reconstruction of Networks with Direct and Indirect Genetic Effects.

Authors:  Willem Kruijer; Pariya Behrouzi; Daniela Bustos-Korts; María Xosé Rodríguez-Álvarez; Seyed Mahdi Mahmoudi; Brian Yandell; Ernst Wit; Fred A van Eeuwijk
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The accuracy of LD Score regression as an estimator of confounding and genetic correlations in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  James J Lee; Matt McGue; William G Iacono; Carson C Chow
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  Targeted enrichment by solution-based hybrid capture to identify genetic sequence variants in barley.

Authors:  Camilla Beate Hill; Debbie Wong; Josquin Tibbits; Kerrie Forrest; Matthew Hayden; Xiao-Qi Zhang; Sharon Westcott; Tefera Tolera Angessa; Chengdao Li
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.444

8.  Comparison of variations detection between whole-genome amplification methods used in single-cell resequencing.

Authors:  Yong Hou; Kui Wu; Xulian Shi; Fuqiang Li; Luting Song; Hanjie Wu; Michael Dean; Guibo Li; Shirley Tsang; Runze Jiang; Xiaolong Zhang; Bo Li; Geng Liu; Niharika Bedekar; Na Lu; Guoyun Xie; Han Liang; Liao Chang; Ting Wang; Jianghao Chen; Yingrui Li; Xiuqing Zhang; Huanming Yang; Xun Xu; Ling Wang; Jun Wang
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 6.524

9.  Gene-set association and epistatic analyses reveal complex gene interaction networks affecting flowering time in a worldwide barley collection.

Authors:  Tianhua He; Camilla Beate Hill; Tefera Tolera Angessa; Xiao-Qi Zhang; Kefei Chen; David Moody; Paul Telfer; Sharon Westcott; Chengdao Li
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 10.  Reinventing quantitative genetics for plant breeding: something old, something new, something borrowed, something BLUE.

Authors:  Rex Bernardo
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.