Melanie Powis1,2, Carissa Milley-Daigle1, Saidah Hack1, Shabbir Alibhai2,3, Simron Singh2,4, Monika K Krzyzanowska1,2,3. 1. Cancer Quality Lab (CQuaL), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network; Toronto ON, Canada. 2. Management and Evaluation, Institute of Health Policy, University of Toronto; Toronto ON, Canada. 3. Department of Medicine, University Health Network; Toronto ON, Canada. 4. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Toronto ON, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The disruption of health services due coronavirus disease (COVID) is expected to dramatically alter cancer care; however, the implications for care quality and outcomes remain poorly understood. We undertook a scoping review to evaluate what is known in the literature about how cancer treatment has been modified as a result of the COVID pandemic in patients receiving treatment for solid tumours, and what domains of quality of care are most impacted. METHODS: Citations were retrieved from MEDLINE and EMBASE (1 Jan 2019 to 28 Oct 2020), utilizing search terms grouped by key concept (oncology, treatment, treatment modifications and COVID). Articles were excluded if they dealt exclusively with management of COVID-positive patients, modifications to cancer screening, diagnosis or supportive care, or were not in English. Articles reporting on guidelines, consensus statements, recommendations, literature reviews, simulations or predictive models, or opinions in the absence of accompanying information on experience with treatment modifications in practice were excluded. Treatment modifications derived from the literature were stratified by modality (surgery, systemic therapy and radiotherapy) and thematically grouped. To understand what areas of quality were most impacted, modifications were mapped against the Institute of Medicine's quality domains. Where reported, barriers and facilitators were abstracted and thematically grouped to understand drivers of treatment modifications. Findings were synthesized into a logic model to conceptualize the inter-relationships between different modifications, as well as their downstream impacts on outcomes. RESULTS: In the 87 retained articles, reductions in outpatients visits (26.4%), and delays/deferrals were commonly reported across all treatment modalities (surgery: 50%; systemic therapy: 55.8%; radiotherapy: 56.7%); as were reductions in surgical capacity (57.1%), alternate systemic regimens with longer treatment intervals or use of oral agents (19.2%), and the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy regimens (40.0%). Delivery of effective, timely and equitable care were the quality domains found to be most impacted. The most commonly reported facilitator of maintaining cancer care delivery levels was the shift to virtual models of care (62.1%), while patient-initiated deferrals and cancellations (34.8%), often due to fear of contracting COVID (60.9%), was a commonly reported barrier. CONCLUSIONS: As it will take a considerable amount of time for the cancer system to resume capacity and adjust models of care in response to the pandemic, these treatment delays and modifications will likely be prolonged, and will negatively impact quality of care and patient outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The disruption of health services due coronavirus disease (COVID) is expected to dramatically alter cancer care; however, the implications for care quality and outcomes remain poorly understood. We undertook a scoping review to evaluate what is known in the literature about how cancer treatment has been modified as a result of the COVID pandemic in patients receiving treatment for solid tumours, and what domains of quality of care are most impacted. METHODS: Citations were retrieved from MEDLINE and EMBASE (1 Jan 2019 to 28 Oct 2020), utilizing search terms grouped by key concept (oncology, treatment, treatment modifications and COVID). Articles were excluded if they dealt exclusively with management of COVID-positive patients, modifications to cancer screening, diagnosis or supportive care, or were not in English. Articles reporting on guidelines, consensus statements, recommendations, literature reviews, simulations or predictive models, or opinions in the absence of accompanying information on experience with treatment modifications in practice were excluded. Treatment modifications derived from the literature were stratified by modality (surgery, systemic therapy and radiotherapy) and thematically grouped. To understand what areas of quality were most impacted, modifications were mapped against the Institute of Medicine's quality domains. Where reported, barriers and facilitators were abstracted and thematically grouped to understand drivers of treatment modifications. Findings were synthesized into a logic model to conceptualize the inter-relationships between different modifications, as well as their downstream impacts on outcomes. RESULTS: In the 87 retained articles, reductions in outpatients visits (26.4%), and delays/deferrals were commonly reported across all treatment modalities (surgery: 50%; systemic therapy: 55.8%; radiotherapy: 56.7%); as were reductions in surgical capacity (57.1%), alternate systemic regimens with longer treatment intervals or use of oral agents (19.2%), and the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy regimens (40.0%). Delivery of effective, timely and equitable care were the quality domains found to be most impacted. The most commonly reported facilitator of maintaining cancer care delivery levels was the shift to virtual models of care (62.1%), while patient-initiated deferrals and cancellations (34.8%), often due to fear of contracting COVID (60.9%), was a commonly reported barrier. CONCLUSIONS: As it will take a considerable amount of time for the cancer system to resume capacity and adjust models of care in response to the pandemic, these treatment delays and modifications will likely be prolonged, and will negatively impact quality of care and patient outcomes.
Authors: Katherine Treiman; Elissa C Kranzler; Rebecca Moultrie; Laura Arena; Nicole Mack; Erica Fortune; Reese Garcia; Richard L Street Journal: J Patient Exp Date: 2022-04-21
Authors: Divya Sood; Ankit Dhiman; Cecilia T Ong; Andrea Y Liu; Jennifer Belanski; Kiran K Turaga; Oliver S Eng Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-05-03 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Meghan J Walker; Jonathan Wang; Joshua Mazuryk; Siew-Mei Skinner; Olivia Meggetto; Eta Ashu; Steven Habbous; Narges Nazeri Rad; Gabriela Espino-Hernández; Ryan Wood; Munaza Chaudhry; Saba Vahid; Julia Gao; Daniela Gallo-Hershberg; Eric Gutierrez; Claudia Zanchetta; Deanna Langer; Victoria Zwicker; Michelle Rey; Martin C Tammemägi; Jill Tinmouth; Rachel Kupets; Anna M Chiarelli; Simron Singh; Padraig Warde; Leta Forbes; Julian Dobranowski; Jonathan Irish; Linda Rabeneck Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-04-01
Authors: Marco Maria Fontanella; Marco Cenzato; Alessandro Fiorindi; Marika Vezzoli; Francesco Doglietto; Luca Zanin; Giorgio Saraceno; Edoardo Agosti; Antonio Barbieri; Silvio Bellocchi; Claudio Bernucci; Daniele Bongetta; Andrea Cardia; Emanuele Costi; Marcello Egidi; Antonio Fioravanti; Roberto Gasparotti; Carlo Giussani; Gianluca Grimod; Nicola Latronico; Davide Locatelli; Dikran Mardighian; Giovanni Nodari; Jacopo Carlo Poli; Frank Rasulo; Elena Roca; Giovanni Marco Sicuri; Giannantonio Spena; Roberto Stefini; Oscar Vivaldi; Cesare Zoia; Stefano Calza Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2021-10-25 Impact factor: 2.216