Literature DB >> 34059195

Detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 both in plasma pools for fractionation and in commercial intravenous immunoglobulins produced from plasma collected in Italy during the pandemic.

Giulio Pisani1, Karen Cristiano1, Matteo Simeoni1, Antonio Martina1, Ilaria Pati2, Alberto Carocci1, Andrea Gaggioli1, Francesco Marino1, Daniela Adriani1, Simonetta Pupella2, Fabio Candura2, Vincenzo De Angelis2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We investigated the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Italian plasma pools and intravenous immunoglobulins sent to our Institute (Italian National Institute of Health - Istituto Superiore di Sanità) in the context of the Official Control Authority Batch Release. The plasma pools were made up from donations collected in several different Italian regions from May 2017 to October 2020, i.e. in the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All plasma pools were initially tested for the qualitative detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies against the nucleocapsid protein using the Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 test kit. Plasma pools positive for these antibodies were further tested using the Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S test kit for the quantitative detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain. All plasma pools showing reactivity to these antibodies were tested undiluted for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using the Grifols Procleix SARS-CoV-2 transcription-mediated amplification assay. Intravenous immunoglobulins were tested using both test kits to determine the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.
RESULTS: All plasma pools made up from donations collected in the pre-pandemic period were negative for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies against the nucleocapsid protein. Of the plasma pools made up from donations collected from December 2018 to March 2020, only 1 pool out of 68 (1.4%), that was made up from donations from the Lombardy region, was reactive for these antibodies. Interestingly, 105 out of 174 (60.3%) of the plasma pools made up from donations collected from November 2018 to October 2020 showed the presence of these antibodies. All plasma pools positive for these antibodies were tested for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain and were confirmed positive. DISCUSSION: None of these plasma pools tested were reactive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. In the case of intravenous immunoglobulins, 20 out of 25 (80%) batches showed the presence of both anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, reflecting the concentration in the plasma pools used for their production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34059195      PMCID: PMC9068351          DOI: 10.2450/2021.0055-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Transfus        ISSN: 1723-2007            Impact factor:   5.752


  9 in total

Review 1.  Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy: how does IgG modulate the immune system?

Authors:  Inessa Schwab; Falk Nimmerjahn
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 53.106

2.  2019-nCoV (Wuhan virus), a novel Coronavirus: human-to-human transmission, travel-related cases, and vaccine readiness.

Authors:  Robyn Ralph; Jocelyne Lew; Tiansheng Zeng; Magie Francis; Bei Xue; Melissa Roux; Ali Toloue Ostadgavahi; Salvatore Rubino; Nicholas J Dawe; Mohammed N Al-Ahdal; David J Kelvin; Christopher D Richardson; Jason Kindrachuk; Darryl Falzarano; Alyson Anne Kelvin
Journal:  J Infect Dev Ctries       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 0.968

3.  Rapidly Increasing Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Neutralization by Intravenous Immunoglobulins Produced From Plasma Collected During the 2020 Pandemic.

Authors:  Maria R Farcet; Michael Karbiener; Julia Schwaiger; Reinhard Ilk; Thomas R Kreil
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 7.759

Review 4.  The COVID-19 infection: lessons from the Italian experience.

Authors:  Sergio Romagnani; Raffaele De Palma; Paola Romagnani; Guido Gnone; Francesco Guzzi; Simone Negrini; Andrea Guastalla; Francesco Annunziato
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.222

5.  Updates on Wuhan 2019 novel coronavirus epidemic.

Authors:  Foster Kofi Ayittey; Christian Dzuvor; Matthew Kormla Ayittey; Nyasha Bennita Chiwero; Ahmed Habib
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.327

6.  Spread of Coronavirus 2019 From Wuhan to Rural Villages in the Hubei Province.

Authors:  Maolin You; Zijing Wu; Yong Yang; Jun Liu; Dehua Liu
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.835

7.  Is SARS-CoV-2 transfusion transmitted?

Authors:  Louis M Katz
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  High Frequency of SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia and Association With Severe Disease.

Authors:  Catherine A Hogan; Bryan A Stevens; Malaya K Sahoo; ChunHong Huang; Natasha Garamani; Saurabh Gombar; Fumiko Yamamoto; Kanagavel Murugesan; Jason Kurzer; James Zehnder; Benjamin A Pinsky
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Intravenous Immunoglobulin for the Treatment of COVID-19: A Promising Tool.

Authors:  Vasilios Tzilas; Effrosyni Manali; Spyridon Papiris; Demosthenes Bouros
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.580

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  The consequences of COVID-19 pandemic on patients with monoclonal gammopathy-associated systemic capillary leak syndrome (Clarkson disease).

Authors:  Marc Pineton de Chambrun; Quentin Moyon; Stanislas Faguer; Geoffrey Urbanski; Alexis Mathian; Noémie Zucman; Marie Werner; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Franco Verlicchi; Zahir Amoura
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2021-12-07

2.  SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization in Convalescent Plasma and Commercial Lots of Plasma-Derived Immunoglobulin.

Authors:  Andreas Volk; Caroline Covini-Souris; Jürgen Römisch; Torben Schmidt; Denis Kuehnel; Christian De Mey
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 5.807

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.