| Literature DB >> 34059047 |
Bosco B Agaba1,2, Karen Anderson3,4, Karryn Gresty3,4, Christiane Prosser4, David Smith3,4, Joaniter I Nankabirwa5,6, Sam Nsobya5,6, Adoke Yeka5,6, Rhoda Namubiru5, Emmanuel Arinaitwe6, Paul Mbaka7, John Kissa8, Chae Seung Lim9, Charles Karamagi5, Joan K Nakayaga5, Moses R Kamya5,6, Qin Cheng3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genetic diversity and parasite relatedness are essential parameters for assessing impact of interventions and understanding transmission dynamics of malaria parasites, however data on its status in Plasmodium falciparum populations in Uganda is limited. Microsatellite markers and DNA sequencing were used to determine diversity and molecular characterization of P. falciparum parasite populations in Uganda.Entities:
Keywords: Genetic diversity; Malaria; Microsatellite markers; Multiclonal infections; Multiplicity of infection; Parasite relatedness; Pfhrp2 deletion; Rapid diagnostic tests
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34059047 PMCID: PMC8165787 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-021-03763-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Geographical distribution of DNA samples used for genotyping. The red and green dots indicate the location where the sequenced and microsatellite typed samples were collected respectively. Black lines indicate district boundaries
Baseline characteristics of samples
| Variable | Frequency | Proportion (%) | Sequenced (%) | Microsatellite typing (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total (n = 147) | (n = 62) | (n = 85) | ||
| Age | ||||
| < 5 | 50 | 34.01 | 40.3 | 29.4 |
| ≥ 5 | 97 | 65.99 | 59.6 | 70.6 |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 80 | 54.42 | 54.8 | 54.1 |
| Female | 67 | 45.58 | 45.2 | 35.9 |
| Region | ||||
| Western | 68 | 46.3 | 37.1 | 51.7 |
| Eastern | 79 | 53.7 | 62.9 | 48.2 |
| Density | ||||
| < 1000 | 51 | 34.69 | 38.7 | 45.8 |
| ≥ 1000 | 96 | 65.31 | 61.3 | 54.1 |
| Endemicity | ||||
| Low transmission | 87 | 59.18 | 45.2 | 69.4 |
| Moderate | 60 | 40.82 | 54.8 | 30.9 |
< 5 and ≥ 5 means less than 5 and equal or above years of age respectively. < 1,000 and ≥ 1,000 means parasite densities of less than 1,000 and equal or greater than 1,000 parasites/µL, respectively
Microsatellite markers, Typing and overall MOI
| Microsatellite marker | No. of samples typed | No. of alleles revealed | Range in no. of alleles | MOI | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2409 | 49 | 65 | 1–3 | 1.33 | NA |
| TA1 | 48 | 56 | 1–2 | 1.17 | NA |
| 383 | 30 | 38 | 1–2 | 1.27 | NA |
| TA109 | 47 | 69 | 1–4 | 1.47 | NA |
| 313 | 19 | 19 | 1–1 | 1 | NA |
| PolyA | 49 | 74 | 1–3 | 1.51 | NA |
| PK2 | 42 | 50 | 1–4 | 1.19 | NA |
| Overall MOI* | 49 | 94 | 1–4 | 1.92 | 1.72–2.12 |
| Overall MOI* (RDT+/PCR +) | 33 | 65 | 1–3 | 1.97 | NA |
| Overall MOI* (RDT−/PCR +) | 16 | 29 | 1–4 | 1.81 | NA |
| Overall MOI* Age | |||||
| < 5 years | 26 | 48 | 1–4 | 1.88 | 1.52–2.24 |
| ≥ 5 years | 23 | 27 | 1–2 | 1.94 | 1.68–2.20 |
| Overall MOI* Region | |||||
| Western | 19 | 36 | 1–2 | 1.89 | 1.54–2.25 |
| Eastern | 31 | 51 | 1–4 | 1.93 | 1.68–2.19 |
*Calculated by selecting the highest number of alleles at any of the markers typed. NA = not applicable
Haplotype determination in pfhrp2/3 deleted samples
| Haplotype | Identified in sample | |
|---|---|---|
| H29 | D196, D204 | |
| H31 | D130, D176, D196 | |
| H25 | D154 | |
| H37 | D169 | |
| H38 | D169 | |
| H26 | D263 | |
| H27 | D263 |
pfhrp2/3 detected: + ; undetected:−
Fig. 2Genetic relatedness of P. falciparum populations. a and b Legend: Genetic relatedness of P. falciparum populations from Uganda differing in pfhrp2/3 genetic gene status (a) and comparison of parasite populations from Uganda and Eritrea (b). The relatedness among parasites was constructed using seven neutral microsatellite markers/loci indicated in Additional file 1: Table S1. Plots were produced using Phyloviz software at cutoff value of 3 minimum differences for 4 loci). Numbered circles indicate specific haplotypes. Circle sizes are proportional to the number of samples with a particular haplotype. The number of samples are indicated inside each circle. Pfhrp2/pfhrp3 status is indicated as: Positive/Positive (wild type), Negative/Negative (dual pfhrp2/3 deletion), Positive/Negative (pfhrp3 deletion) and Negative/Positive (Pfhrp2 deletion)
Fig. 3Sequence length of pfhrp2 exon2. LM means light microscopy
Fig. 4Phylogeny bootstrap consensus neighbour-join tree. D = discordant samples (RDT−/LM +), C = concordant samples (RDT+/LM +)
pfhrp2 Amino Acid Repeat types, translated sequences and frequencies (n = 62)
| PfHRP2 | Total (N = 62) | Region | RDT and LM | p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| East | West | RDT−/LM + | RDT+/LM + | ||||
| Code | Repeat sequences | (N = 40) | (N = 22) | (N = 24) | (N = 38) | ||
| 1 | AHHAHHVAD | 2.7 ± 1.4 | 1–7 | 0–6 | 2.9 ± 1.5 | 2.6 ± 1.3 | 0.504 |
| 2 | AHHAHHAAD | 11.8 ± 2.2 | 10–17 | 8–13 | 12.1 ± 1.9 | 11.7 ± 2.4 | 0.427 |
| 3 | AHHAHHAAY | 1.2 ± 0.7 | 0–2 | 0–3 | 1.1 ± 0.7 | 1.3 ± 0.7 | 0.457 |
| 4 | AHH | 0.5 ± 0.8 | 0–3 | 0–1 | 0.3 ± 0.6 | 0.6 ± 0.9 | 0.146 |
| 5 | AHHAHHASD | 0.7 ± 0.5 | 0–2 | 0–1 | 0.8 ± 0.5 | 0.6 ± 0.5 | 0.221 |
| 6 | AHHATD | 3.0 ± 1.4 | 1–6 | 2–5 | 3.0 ± 1.3 | 3.0 ± 1.4 | 1 |
| 7 | AHHAAD | 6.5 ± 2.4 | 4–11 | 4–8 | 6.2 ± 2.1 | 6.8 ± 2.5 | 0.317 |
| 8 | AHHAAY | 1.1 ± 0.6 | 0–2 | 1–2 | 1.2 ± 0.8 | 1.1 ± 0.5 | 0.85 |
| 9 | AAY | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | NA |
| 10 | AHHAAAHHATD | 1.6 ± 0.7 | 0–3 | 0–2 | 1.9 ± 0.7 | 1.5 ± 0.6 | 0.018 |
| 11 | AHN | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | NA |
| 12 | AHHAAAHHEAATH | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | NA |
| 13 | AHHASD | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | NA |
| 14 | AHHAHHATD | 0.3 ± 0.4 | 0–1 | 0–1 | 0.4 ± 0.5 | 0.2 ± 0.4 | 0.097 |
| *New | 0.0 ± 0.3 | 0–2 | 0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.1 ± 0.3 | 0.324 | |
*New = are sequences observed in Ugandan isolates that had not been reported before. East and West are the Eastern and Western regions of Uganda. Data was given by mean + -SD. P-value was calculated by Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon’s Rank Sum test as appropriate. LM = microscopy
Unique pfhrp2 sequences, sequence types and their proportions (n = 62)
| Genomic DNA sub-sets | No. sequenced | Unique Sequence types identified | Sequence type A | Sequence type B | Sequence type C | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | |
| RDT+/LM + | 38 | 38 | 100% | 5 | 13% | 30 | 79% | 3 | 8% |
| RDT−/LM + | 24 | 23 | 96% | 3 | 13% | 18 | 75% | 3 | 13% |
| Overall | 62 | 61 | 98% | 8 | 13% | 48 | 77% | 6 | 10% |
RDT+/LM + and RDT−/LM + are genomic DNA samples that were initially (HRP2 RDT negative and microscopy positive) and those that were both HRP2 RDT and microscopy positive respectively
Fig. 5GIS mapping for distribution of sequences across sites. The different colored dots represent the different HRP2 sequence types