Xintong Lyu1, Ping Wang1, Qiao Qiao1, Yuanjun Jiang2. 1. Department of Radiotherapy, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China. 2. Department of Urology, First hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China. 13804064945@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The tumour microenvironment (TME) not only plays a role during tumour progression and metastasis but also profoundly influences treatment efficacy. Environment-mediated drug resistance is a result of crosstalk between tumour cells and stroma. The presence of a "stromal exhaustion" response is suggested by the T cell exhaustion signature and PD-L1 expression. The prognostic role of PD-L1 in bladder cancer has been investigated in previous studies, but the results remain inconclusive. For a more comprehensive study, we discuss potential strategies to improve effectiveness in patients with various TME statuses and PD-L1 expression levels. METHODS: We estimated the prognostic role of PD-L1 using immunohistochemistry and identified four immune subtypes according to the type of stromal immune modulation and PD-L1 expression status. RESULTS: Patients in the PD-L1-low-exhausted group had the worst prognosis and showed the worst antigen-presenting cell (APC) immunosuppression status. The PD-L1-low-exhausted group showed the highest amount of infiltration by macrophage M2 cells, naïve B cells and resting mast cells. The TMB and the effectiveness of anti-PD-1 treatment were significantly increased in the PD-L1-high expression groups compared with the PD-L1-low expression groups. In the PD-L1-high groups, patients who underwent chemotherapy exhibited better overall survival rates than patients who did not undergo chemotherapy, whereas there was no significant difference in the PD-L1-low groups. We performed gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to explore the critical pathways that were active in the PD-L1-low-exhausted group, including the myogenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition and adipogenesis pathways. Copy number variations (CNVs) were related to the expression levels of differentially expressed genes upregulated in the PD-L1-low-exhausted group, including LCNL1, FBP1 and RASL11B. In addition, RASL11B played a role in predicting overall survival according to The Cancer Genome Atlas data, and this finding was validated in the PD-L1-low-exhausted group in the Gene Expression Omnibus database (GEO). CONCLUSION: The immune environment of tumours plays an important role in the therapeutic response rate, and defining the immune groups plays a critical role in predicting disease outcome and strategy effectiveness.
BACKGROUND: The tumour microenvironment (TME) not only plays a role during tumour progression and metastasis but also profoundly influences treatment efficacy. Environment-mediated drug resistance is a result of crosstalk between tumour cells and stroma. The presence of a "stromal exhaustion" response is suggested by the T cell exhaustion signature and PD-L1 expression. The prognostic role of PD-L1 in bladder cancer has been investigated in previous studies, but the results remain inconclusive. For a more comprehensive study, we discuss potential strategies to improve effectiveness in patients with various TME statuses and PD-L1 expression levels. METHODS: We estimated the prognostic role of PD-L1 using immunohistochemistry and identified four immune subtypes according to the type of stromal immune modulation and PD-L1 expression status. RESULTS:Patients in the PD-L1-low-exhausted group had the worst prognosis and showed the worst antigen-presenting cell (APC) immunosuppression status. The PD-L1-low-exhausted group showed the highest amount of infiltration by macrophage M2 cells, naïve B cells and resting mast cells. The TMB and the effectiveness of anti-PD-1 treatment were significantly increased in the PD-L1-high expression groups compared with the PD-L1-low expression groups. In the PD-L1-high groups, patients who underwent chemotherapy exhibited better overall survival rates than patients who did not undergo chemotherapy, whereas there was no significant difference in the PD-L1-low groups. We performed gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to explore the critical pathways that were active in the PD-L1-low-exhausted group, including the myogenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition and adipogenesis pathways. Copy number variations (CNVs) were related to the expression levels of differentially expressed genes upregulated in the PD-L1-low-exhausted group, including LCNL1, FBP1 and RASL11B. In addition, RASL11B played a role in predicting overall survival according to The Cancer Genome Atlas data, and this finding was validated in the PD-L1-low-exhausted group in the Gene Expression Omnibus database (GEO). CONCLUSION: The immune environment of tumours plays an important role in the therapeutic response rate, and defining the immune groups plays a critical role in predicting disease outcome and strategy effectiveness.
Authors: Oner Sanli; Jakub Dobruch; Margaret A Knowles; Maximilian Burger; Mehrdad Alemozaffar; Matthew E Nielsen; Yair Lotan Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2017-04-13 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Joaquim Bellmunt; Ronald de Wit; David J Vaughn; Yves Fradet; Jae-Lyun Lee; Lawrence Fong; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Miguel A Climent; Daniel P Petrylak; Toni K Choueiri; Andrea Necchi; Winald Gerritsen; Howard Gurney; David I Quinn; Stéphane Culine; Cora N Sternberg; Yabing Mai; Christian H Poehlein; Rodolfo F Perini; Dean F Bajorin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-02-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jonathan E Rosenberg; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Tom Powles; Michiel S van der Heijden; Arjun V Balar; Andrea Necchi; Nancy Dawson; Peter H O'Donnell; Ani Balmanoukian; Yohann Loriot; Sandy Srinivas; Margitta M Retz; Petros Grivas; Richard W Joseph; Matthew D Galsky; Mark T Fleming; Daniel P Petrylak; Jose Luis Perez-Gracia; Howard A Burris; Daniel Castellano; Christina Canil; Joaquim Bellmunt; Dean Bajorin; Dorothee Nickles; Richard Bourgon; Garrett M Frampton; Na Cui; Sanjeev Mariathasan; Oyewale Abidoye; Gregg D Fine; Robert Dreicer Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-03-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ashish M Kamat; Noah M Hahn; Jason A Efstathiou; Seth P Lerner; Per-Uno Malmström; Woonyoung Choi; Charles C Guo; Yair Lotan; Wassim Kassouf Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Christophe Massard; Michael S Gordon; Sunil Sharma; Saeed Rafii; Zev A Wainberg; Jason Luke; Tyler J Curiel; Gerardo Colon-Otero; Omid Hamid; Rachel E Sanborn; Peter H O'Donnell; Alexandra Drakaki; Winston Tan; John F Kurland; Marlon C Rebelatto; Xiaoping Jin; John A Blake-Haskins; Ashok Gupta; Neil H Segal Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Arjun V Balar; Matthew D Galsky; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Thomas Powles; Daniel P Petrylak; Joaquim Bellmunt; Yohann Loriot; Andrea Necchi; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Jose Luis Perez-Gracia; Nancy A Dawson; Michiel S van der Heijden; Robert Dreicer; Sandy Srinivas; Margitta M Retz; Richard W Joseph; Alexandra Drakaki; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Srikala S Sridhar; David I Quinn; Ignacio Durán; David R Shaffer; Bernhard J Eigl; Petros D Grivas; Evan Y Yu; Shi Li; Edward E Kadel; Zachary Boyd; Richard Bourgon; Priti S Hegde; Sanjeev Mariathasan; AnnChristine Thåström; Oyewale O Abidoye; Gregg D Fine; Dean F Bajorin Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-12-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Andrea B Apolo; Jeffrey R Infante; Ani Balmanoukian; Manish R Patel; Ding Wang; Karen Kelly; Anthony E Mega; Carolyn D Britten; Alain Ravaud; Alain C Mita; Howard Safran; Thomas E Stinchcombe; Marko Srdanov; Arnold B Gelb; Michael Schlichting; Kevin Chin; James L Gulley Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 44.544