Literature DB >> 34058719

FRoG dose computation meets Monte Carlo accuracy for proton therapy dose calculation in lung.

Giuseppe Magro1, Stewart Mein2, Benedikt Kopp3, Edoardo Mastella1, Andrea Pella1, Mario Ciocca1, Andrea Mairani4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To benchmark and evaluate the clinical viability of novel analytical GPU-accelerated and CPU-based Monte Carlo (MC) dose-engines for spot-scanning intensity-modulated-proton-therapy (IMPT) towards the improvement of lung cancer treatment.
METHODS: Nine patient cases were collected from the CNAO clinical experience and The Cancer Imaging Archive-4D-Lung-Database for in-silico study. All plans were optimized with 2 orthogonal beams in RayStation (RS) v.8. Forward calculations were performed with FRoG, an independent dose calculation system using a fast robust approach to the pencil beam algorithm (PBA), RS-MC (CPU for v.8) and general-purpose MC (gp-MC). Dosimetric benchmarks were acquired via irradiation of a lung-like phantom and ionization chambers for both a single-field-uniform-dose (SFUD) and IMPT plans. Dose-volume-histograms, dose-difference and γ-analyses were conducted.
RESULTS: With respect to reference gp-MC, the average dose to the GTV was 1.8% and 2.3% larger for FRoG and the RS-MC treatment planning system (TPS). FRoG and RS-MC showed a local γ-passing rate of ~96% and ~93%. Phantom measurements confirmed FRoG's high accuracywith a deviation < 0.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: Dose calculation performance using the GPU-accelerated analytical PBA, MC-TPS and gp-MC code were well within clinical tolerances. FRoG predictions were in good agreement with both the full gp-MC and experimental data for proton beams optimized for thoracic dose calculations. GPU-accelerated dose-engines like FRoG may alleviate current issues related to deficiencies in current commercial analytical proton beam models. The novel approach to the PBA implemented in FRoG is suitable for either clinical TPS or as an auxiliary dose-engine to support clinical activity for lung patients.
Copyright © 2021 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GPU; Lung; Pencil-beam algorithm; Proton-therapy

Year:  2021        PMID: 34058719     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.05.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  3 in total

1.  How can we consider variable RBE and LETd prediction during clinical practice? A pediatric case report at the Normandy Proton Therapy Centre using an independent dose engine.

Authors:  Stewart Mein; Benedikt Kopp; Anthony Vela; Pauline Dutheil; Paul Lesueur; Dinu Stefan; Jürgen Debus; Thomas Haberer; Amir Abdollahi; Andrea Mairani; Thomas Tessonnier
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 2.  Management of Motion and Anatomical Variations in Charged Particle Therapy: Past, Present, and Into the Future.

Authors:  Julia M Pakela; Antje Knopf; Lei Dong; Antoni Rucinski; Wei Zou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Developing an accurate model of spot-scanning treatment delivery time and sequence for a compact superconducting synchrocyclotron proton therapy system.

Authors:  Lewei Zhao; Gang Liu; Shupeng Chen; Jiajian Shen; Weili Zheng; An Qin; Di Yan; Xiaoqiang Li; Xuanfeng Ding
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 4.309

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.