Kelly T Gleason1, Yvonne Commodore-Mensah2, Albert W Wu3, Robert Kearns4, Peter Pronovost5, Hanan Aboumatar4, Cheryl R Dennison Himmelfarb6. 1. School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: kgleaso2@jhmi.edu. 2. School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. 5. University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA. 6. School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Education about patient safety has historically been limited in health professionals curricula and largely inaccessible to the general public. We developed a massive open online course (MOOC), The Science of Safety in Healthcare, to present the foundational patient safety principles to a broad global audience of health professionals, learners, and patients interested in patient safety. OBJECTIVES: To describe the Science of Safety in Healthcare MOOC, its effects on patient safety competence, and the satisfaction of course participants. METHODS: The five-week video-based course was delivered in 2013 and 2014, and was organized in five modules: 1) overview of science of safety and safety culture, 2) enabling and contextual factors that influence patient safety and quality, 3) methods to improve safety and quality, 4) translating evidence intro practice and leading change, and 5) summary and opportunities for capacity building. Each module had three or four segments. Participants were introduced to key concepts, and tools and skills to promote patient safety. Participants completed the Health Professional Education in Patient Safety Survey (H-PEPSS), which measures patient safety competence, and a course satisfaction survey. Pre- and post- course H-PEPSS scores were compared using paired t-tests. Course satisfaction surveys were administered at the completion of the course and six months later. RESULTS: A total of 20,957, and 9679 participants enrolled in the course in 2013 and 2014, respectively. About half of participants were 25-44 years old (57%), and female (54%). Participants joined from over 100 countries. The majority were health professionals (61%) or health professionals in training (7%). Mean H-PEPSS scores improved after course completion, with significant increases on all survey domains in both years (p < 0.01). Mean score differences were: Teamwork 0.68 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.71), Communication 0.70 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.73), Managing Risk 0.79 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.82), Human Environment 0.64 (95% CI: 0.61, 0.68), Recognizing and Responding 0.64 (95% CI: 0.61, 0.68), and Culture 0.72 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.75). About 8% of participants in each cohort earned a certificate of completion. At 6-months post-course, the majority of the participants agreed or agreed strongly that the course content was useful (93%) and that the course positively influenced their clinical practice (69%) and communication (84%). CONCLUSIONS: The MOOC course allowed educators to reach a large, diverse audience. The course was well-received and participants reported a significant increase in patient safety competence. As with most MOOCs, rates of completion were low.
BACKGROUND: Education about patient safety has historically been limited in health professionals curricula and largely inaccessible to the general public. We developed a massive open online course (MOOC), The Science of Safety in Healthcare, to present the foundational patient safety principles to a broad global audience of health professionals, learners, and patients interested in patient safety. OBJECTIVES: To describe the Science of Safety in Healthcare MOOC, its effects on patient safety competence, and the satisfaction of course participants. METHODS: The five-week video-based course was delivered in 2013 and 2014, and was organized in five modules: 1) overview of science of safety and safety culture, 2) enabling and contextual factors that influence patient safety and quality, 3) methods to improve safety and quality, 4) translating evidence intro practice and leading change, and 5) summary and opportunities for capacity building. Each module had three or four segments. Participants were introduced to key concepts, and tools and skills to promote patient safety. Participants completed the Health Professional Education in Patient Safety Survey (H-PEPSS), which measures patient safety competence, and a course satisfaction survey. Pre- and post- course H-PEPSS scores were compared using paired t-tests. Course satisfaction surveys were administered at the completion of the course and six months later. RESULTS: A total of 20,957, and 9679 participants enrolled in the course in 2013 and 2014, respectively. About half of participants were 25-44 years old (57%), and female (54%). Participants joined from over 100 countries. The majority were health professionals (61%) or health professionals in training (7%). Mean H-PEPSS scores improved after course completion, with significant increases on all survey domains in both years (p < 0.01). Mean score differences were: Teamwork 0.68 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.71), Communication 0.70 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.73), Managing Risk 0.79 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.82), Human Environment 0.64 (95% CI: 0.61, 0.68), Recognizing and Responding 0.64 (95% CI: 0.61, 0.68), and Culture 0.72 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.75). About 8% of participants in each cohort earned a certificate of completion. At 6-months post-course, the majority of the participants agreed or agreed strongly that the course content was useful (93%) and that the course positively influenced their clinical practice (69%) and communication (84%). CONCLUSIONS: The MOOC course allowed educators to reach a large, diverse audience. The course was well-received and participants reported a significant increase in patient safety competence. As with most MOOCs, rates of completion were low.
Authors: Courtney West; Lori Graham; Ryan T Palmer; Marissa Fuqua Miller; Erin K Thayer; Margaret L Stuber; Linda Awdishu; Rachel A Umoren; Maria A Wamsley; Elizabeth A Nelson; Pablo A Joo; James W Tysinger; Paul George; Patricia A Carney Journal: J Interprof Educ Pract Date: 2016-07-19
Authors: Carmen María Sarabia-Cobo; Blanca Torres-Manrique; Ma Carmen Ortego-Mate; Paloma Salvadores-Fuentes; María Sáenz-Jalón Journal: J Contin Educ Nurs Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 1.224
Authors: Mirjam Westerlaken; Ingrid Christiaans-Dingelhoff; Renée M Filius; Bas de Vries; Martine de Bruijne; Marjel van Dam Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 2.463