Literature DB >> 34057833

Relationship Between Tasked Vocal Effort Levels and Measures of Vocal Intensity.

Eric J Hunter1, Mark L Berardi1, Miriam van Mersbergen2.   

Abstract

Purpose Patients with voice problems commonly report increased vocal effort, regardless of the underlying pathophysiology. Previous studies investigating vocal effort and voice production have used a range of methods to quantify vocal effort. The goals of the current study were to use the Borg CR100 effort scale to (a) demonstrate the relation between vocal intensity or vocal level (dB) and tasked vocal effort goals and (b) investigate the repeated measure reliability of vocal level at tasked effort level goals. Method Three types of speech (automatic, read, and structured spontaneous) were elicited at four vocal effort level goals on the Borg CR100 scale (2, 13, 25, and 50) from 20 participants (10 females and 10 males). Results Participants' vocal level reliably changed approximately 5 dB between the elicited effort level goals; this difference was statistically significant and repeatable. Biological females produced a voice with consistently less intensity for a vocal effort level goal compared to biological males. Conclusions The results indicate the utility of the Borg CR100 in tracking effort in voice production that is repeatable with respect to vocal level (dB). Future research will investigate other metrics of voice production with the goal of understanding the mechanisms underlying vocal effort and the external environmental influences on the perception of vocal effort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34057833      PMCID: PMC8740752          DOI: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  58 in total

1.  Vocal effort with changing talker-to-listener distance in different acoustic environments.

Authors:  David Pelegrín-García; Bertrand Smits; Jonas Brunskog; Cheol-Ho Jeong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Autophonic Loudness of Singers in Simulated Room Acoustic Environments.

Authors:  Manuj Yadav; Densil Cabrera
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  The relationship between acoustical and perceptual measures of vocal effort.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Tongue-palate contact pressure, oral air pressure, and acoustics of clear speech.

Authors:  Jeff Searl; Paul M Evitts
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Vocal responses to emotional picture viewing.

Authors:  Miriam van Mersbergen; Molly Delany
Journal:  Logoped Phoniatr Vocol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 1.487

6.  Relationship between perceived exertion and mean power frequency of the EMG signal from the upper trapezius muscle during isometric shoulder elevation.

Authors:  A Hummel; T Läubli; M Pozzo; P Schenk; S Spillmann; A Klipstein
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Dependence of phonatory effort on hydration level.

Authors:  K Verdolini; I R Titze; A Fennell
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-10

8.  Vocal fatigue and its relation to vocal hyperfunction †.

Authors:  Nancy Pearl Solomon
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.484

9.  School teachers' vocal use, risk factors, and voice disorder prevalence: guidelines to detect teachers with current voice problems.

Authors:  Rosa M Bermúdez de Alvear; Francisco Javier Barón; Antonio Ginés Martínez-Arquero
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 0.849

10.  Functional dysphonia during mental imagery: testing the trait theory of voice disorders.

Authors:  Miriam van Mersbergen; Christopher Patrick; Leslie Glaze
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Semiautomated Protocol Towards Quantifying Vocal Effort in Relation to Vocal Performance During a Vocal Loading Task.

Authors:  Eric J Hunter; Mark L Berardi; Susanna Whitling
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Quantifying Vocal Repertoire Tessituras Through Real-Time Measures.

Authors:  Matthew Schloneger; Eric J Hunter; Lynn Maxfield
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2021-07-25       Impact factor: 2.009

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.