Hironori Izawa1,2, Fumika Yasufuku3, Toshiki Nokami1,2, Shinsuke Ifuku1,2, Hiroyuki Saimoto1,2, Toru Matsui4, Kenji Morihashi4, Masato Sumita5. 1. Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Faculty of Engineering, Tottori University, 4-101 Koyama-Minami, Tottori 680-8550, Japan. 2. Center for Research on Green Sustainable Chemistry, Tottori University, 4-101 Koyama-Minami, Tottori 680-8550, Japan. 3. Graduate School of Sustainable Science, Tottori University, 4-101 Koyama-Minami, Tottori 680-8550, Japan. 4. Department of Chemistry, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8571, Japan. 5. Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, RIKEN, Nihombashi 1-chome Mitsui Building, 15th Floor, 1-4-1 Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-0027, Japan.
Abstract
The development of anion sensors for selective detection of a specific anion is a crucial research topic. We previously reported a selective photo-induced colorimetric reaction of 1-methyl-3-(N-(1,8-naphthalimidyl)ethyl)imidazolium (MNEI) having a cationic receptor in the presence of molecules having multiple carboxy groups, such as succinate, citrate, and polyacrylate. However, the mechanism underlying this reaction was not clarified. Here, we investigate the photo-induced colorimetric reaction of N-[2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]-1,8-naphthalimide (TENI), which has a different cationic receptor from MNEI and undergoes the photo-induced colorimetric reaction, and its analogues to clarify the reaction mechanism. The TENI analogues having substituents on the naphthalene ring provide important evidence, suggesting that the colorimetric chemical species were radical anions generated via photo-induced electron transfer from carboxylate to the naphthalimide derivative. The generation of the naphthalimide-based radical anion is verified by 1H NMR and cyclic voltammetry analyses, and photo-reduction of methylene blue is mediated by TENI. In addition, the role of the cationic receptor for the photo-induced colorimetric reaction is investigated with TENI analogues having different hydrophilic groups instead of the trimethylammonium group. Interestingly, the photo-induced colorimetric reaction is observed in a nonionic analogue having a polyethylene glycol group, indicating that the colorimetric reaction does not require a cationic receptor. On the other hand, we reveal that the trimethylammonium group stabilizes the radical anion species. These generation and stabilization phenomena of naphthalimide-based radical anion species will contribute to the development of sophisticated detection systems specific for carboxylate.
The development of anion sensors for selective detection of a specificanion is a crucial research topic. We previously reported a selective photo-induced colorimetric reaction of 1-methyl-3-(N-(1,8-naphthalimidyl)ethyl)imidazolium (MNEI) having a cationic receptor in the presence of molecules having multiple carboxy groups, such as succinate, citrate, and polyacrylate. However, the mechanism underlying this reaction was not clarified. Here, we investigate the photo-induced colorimetric reaction of N-[2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]-1,8-naphthalimide (TENI), which has a different cationic receptor from MNEI and undergoes the photo-induced colorimetric reaction, and its analogues to clarify the reaction mechanism. The TENI analogues having substituents on the naphthalene ring provide important evidence, suggesting that the colorimetricchemical species were radical anions generated via photo-induced electron transfer from carboxylate to the naphthalimide derivative. The generation of the naphthalimide-based radical anion is verified by 1HNMR and cyclic voltammetry analyses, and photo-reduction of methylene blue is mediated by TENI. In addition, the role of the cationic receptor for the photo-induced colorimetric reaction is investigated with TENI analogues having different hydrophilic groups instead of the trimethylammonium group. Interestingly, the photo-induced colorimetric reaction is observed in a nonionic analogue having a polyethylene glycol group, indicating that the colorimetric reaction does not require a cationic receptor. On the other hand, we reveal that the trimethylammonium group stabilizes the radical anion species. These generation and stabilization phenomena of naphthalimide-based radical anion species will contribute to the development of sophisticated detection systems specific for carboxylate.
Colorimetric
and fluorescent anion sensors for the selective detection
of specificanions are an important research topic because anions
play crucial roles in biological systems and industrial applications.[1−6] Numerous probe molecules with anion receptors harnessing weak interactions
such as hydrogen bonding interactions, hydrophobic interactions, and
electrostatic interactions have been developed.[7−9] Their anion
recognition events involve changes in their optical properties that
are attributed to intra-/inter-molecular electron transfer (ET)[10] and photo-induced ET (PET)[11,12] by virtue of anion binding.The 1,8-naphthalimide (NI) derivatives
are attractive species for
developing anion sensors because they have an electron-deficient naphthalene
ring capable of ET and PET.[6,13−16] We previously reported the interesting photophysical property of
1-methyl-3-(N-(1,8-naphthalimidyl)ethyl)imidazolium
(MNEI), which consists of the NI group as a chromophore, an imidazole
group as an anion receptor, and an N-ethyl linker.[17] The fluorescence intensities decreased as the
electronegativity decreased owing to charge transfer from anion to
MNEI.[18,19] In addition, MNEI underwent a photo-induced
colorimetric reaction, in which the MNEI aqueous solution became yellow
in the presence of carboxylate derivatives by UV light irradiation.[20,21] The yellow chemical species was unstable to O2, and the
yellow color gradually disappeared under an ambient condition. The
colorimetric reaction of MNEI proceeded especially readily in the
presence of molecules having multiple carboxy groups, such as succinate,
citrate, and polyacrylate, or amphiphiliccarboxylate derivatives
such as laurate and phenylacetate.[20,21] In contrast,
the yellowing reaction was not observed in the presence of the same
amount of acetate, but it was slightly observed in the presence of
a ca. 30-fold higher amount of acetate. In addition, we used machine
learning analysis to extract decisive factors that dominate the fate
of MNEI salts after UV light irradiation, and the results suggested
that pKa, the number of carboxy groups,
and the bulkiness of carboxylate derivatives were important factors
for the colorimetric reaction.[21] However,
the mechanism for the photo-induced colorimetric reaction has not
been clarified. If the mechanism by which the carboxy groups are selectively
detected could be revealed, it would provide a novel design principle
for anion sensor molecules.We expected that the photo-induced
colorimetric reaction using
MNEI analogues having a substituent on the naphthalene ring would
provide important evidence that could help to clarify the mechanism
for the selective detection of carboxy groups. However, we could not
synthesize MNEI analogues because of the difficulty in the synthesis
and purification of ionic molecules. Therefore, we investigated N-[2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]-NI (TENI) having a trimethylammonium
group instead of the imidazolium group (Figure A) because TENI was easily synthesized via
methylation of N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-NI[22] (DENI), which is a quantitative reaction carried
out at room temperature[23] (Scheme S1), and we found that TENI showed the
change in fluorescence intensity as the binding anions’ electrophilic
property and the photo-induced colorimetric reaction in the presence
of carboxylic acid derivatives as readily as MNEI (see Figures S1 and S2 and the description below).
In addition, we could synthesize TENI analogues having an electron-withdrawing
group (NO2-TENI) or an electron-donating group (CH3O-TENI) (Figure A) via the methylation reaction (Scheme S1). We additionally synthesized N,N′-bis[2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]-1,8:4,5-naphthalenetetracarboxdiimide
(TENDI) as an analogue having electron-withdrawing groups because
naphthalenediimide (NDI) derivatives, having the imide groups at the
1,8- and 4,5-positions on the naphthalene ring, are well-known π-electron-deficient
compounds and have attracted great attention as probe molecules.[24] The photo-induced colorimetric reaction using
these TENI analogues and TENDI having different highest occupied molecular
orbital–lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (HOMO–LUMO)
gaps would provide important evidence to clarify the mechanism underlying
the colorimetric reaction. In addition, we investigated the role of
the cationic receptor for the colorimetric reaction with two TENI
analogues having a different substituent in the place of the trimethylammonium
group—namely, DENI and N-(methoxypolyethylene
glycol)-NI (PEGNI) (Figure B).
Figure 1
Synthesized TENI analogues having a substituent on the NI group
(A) or having a different substituent in the place of the trimethylammonium
group (B).
Synthesized TENI analogues having a substituent on the NI group
(A) or having a different substituent in the place of the trimethylammonium
group (B).
Materials and Methods
Materials
N,N-Dimethylethylenediamine
and succinic acid disodium salt
were purchased from Nacalai Tesque (Kyoto, Japan). 1,8-Naphthalic
anhydride, 3-nitro-1,8-naphthalic anhydride, iodomethane, and methoxypolyethylene
glycol amine 750 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Japan (Tokyo, Japan).
4-Bromo-1,8-naphthalic anhydride, naphthalene-1,4,5,8-tetracarboxylic
dianhydride, and sodium methoxide were purchased from Tokyo Chemical
Industries (Tokyo, Japan). Copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate and sodium
polyacrylate (DP: 22,000–70,000) were purchased from Wako Pure
Chemical Industries (Osaka, Japan). Other reagents were of commercial
grade and used without further purification.
Instrumentation
Nuclear magnetic
resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded on a JNM-ECP500 (JEOL, Tokyo,
Japan). Infrared (IR) spectra of the samples were recorded using a
Spectrum 65 (PerkinElmer Japan, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an attenuated
total reflection attachment. Elemental analysis data were measured
on a PerkinElmer 2400 II CHNS/O (PerkinElmer, Franklin Lakes, NJ,
USA). Mass spectra were recorded using an Exactive plus Orbitrap MASS
spectrometer (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). UV–vis
spectra were recorded on a Multiskan GO (Thermo Fischer Scientific,
Waltham, MA, USA). Fluorescence spectra were recorded on an RF-6000
(Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was performed on
a BAS 700E electrochemical analyzer (BAS, Tokyo, Japan) using the
closed-type electrolysis cell equipped with a glassy carbon as the
working electrode, a platinum wire as the counter electrode, and a
saturated calomel electrode as the reference electrode.
Synthesis of Probe Molecules
N-[2-(Dimethylamino)ethyl]-NI
(DENI)[22]
1,8-Naphthalic anhydride
(2.03 g, 10.24 mmol) and N,N-dimethylethylenediamine
(4.41 g, 50.03 mmol) were added to dimethylformamide (DMF) (30 mL),
and the solution was stirred at 100 °C for 5 h. The reaction
solution was cooled to room temperature and poured into a large volume
of water (250 mL). The precipitated product was corrected by filtration,
followed by washing with water. The product was dried under reduced
pressure. Yield: 87.3% (2.40 g, 8.94 mmol). 1HNMR (500
MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 2.17 (s, 6H, CH3−), 4.13 (t, 2H, J = 6.30 Hz, −CH2CH2−), 7.84 (t, 2H, J =
7.73 Hz, naphthalimide), 8.43 (d, 2H, J = 8.02 Hz,
naphthalimide), 8.47 (d, 2H, J = 6.87 Hz, naphthalimide)
ppm.
TENI Iodide
N-[2-(Dimethylamino)ethyl]-NI
(0.51 g, 1.90 mmol) and methyliodide (0.84 g, 5.91 mmol) were added
to DMF (20 mL) and stirred for 1 h at room temperature. The product
was gradually precipitated out during the reaction. The product was
corrected by filtration, washed with water, and dried under reduced
pressure. Yield: 88.4% (0.69 g, 1.68 mmol). 1HNMR (500
MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 3.20 (s, 9H, CH3−), 3.62 (t, 2H, J = 7.16 Hz, −CH2CH2−), 4.46 (t, 2H, J =
7.16 Hz, −CH2CH2−), 7.91 (t, 2H, J = 7.73 Hz, naphthalimide), 8.51 (d, 2H, J = 8.02 Hz, naphthalimide), 8.53 (d, 2H, J = 7.45
Hz, naphthalimide) ppm. ESI–MS m/z: calcd for [TENI]+ = 283.1441; found, 283.1436. Elemental
analysis calcd for C17H19IN2O2 = C, 49.77; H, 4.67; N, 6.83. Found: C, 49.50; H, 4.69; N,
6.92. FT-IR (neat, cm–1) 776.92 (ArH), 1237.12 (C–N),
1653.98 (C=O), 2996.00 (C–H).
4-Bromo-N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-NI[25]
4-Bromo-1,8-naphthalic anhydride (1.39
g, 5.02 mmol) and N,N-dimethylethylenediamine
(0.50 g, 5.70 mmol) were added to DMF (25 mL), and the solution was
stirred at 120 °C for 2 h. The reaction solution was cooled to
room temperature, and then the product was precipitated out. The precipitated
product was corrected by filtration, washed with water, and dried
under reduced pressure. Yield: 82.7% (1.44 g, 4.15 mmol). 1HNMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 2.35
(s, 6H, −CH3), 2.65 (t, 2H, J =
7.49 −CH2CH2−), 4.32 (t, 2H, J = 6.30 Hz, −CH2CH2−),
7.85 (t, 1H, J = 7.45 Hz, naphthalimide), 8.04 (d,
1H, J = 7.45 Hz, naphthalimide), 8.42 (d, 1H, J = 7.45 Hz, naphthalimide), 8.58 (d, 2H, J = 8.02 Hz, naphthalimide), 8.66 (d, 2H, J = 6.30
Hz, naphthalimide) ppm.
4-Methoxy-N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-NI[26]
4-Bromo-N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-NI
(0.50 g, 1.44 mmol) was added to methanol (20 mL). Then, sodium methoxide
(0.62 g, 11.5 mmol) and copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate (0.04 g, 0.17
mmol) were added, and the solution was stirred at 80 °C for 12
h. After removal of methanol under reduced pressure, the residue was
washed using a small volume of water, and the product was dried under
reduced pressure. Yield: 12.5% (50 mg, 0.18 mmol). 1HNMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.36 (s, 6H, CH3−),
2.65 (t, 2H, J = 6.30 Hz, −CH2CH2−), 4.13 (s, 3H, CH3O−), 4.32 (t,
2H, J = 6.87, −CH2CH2−), 7.04 (d, 1H, J = 8.02 Hz, naphthalimide),
7.70 (t, 1H, J = 7.73, naphthalimide), 8.56 (d, 2H, J = 8.02 Hz, naphthalimide), 8.60 (d, 1H, J = 6.88 Hz, naphthalimide) ppm.
4-Methoxy-TENI
Iodide (CH3O-TENI-I)
4-Methoxy-N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-NI (0.050
g, 0.18 mmol) and methyliodide (0.090 g, 0.63 mmol) were added to
DMF (10 mL) and stirred for 1 h at room temperature. After removal
of DMF under reduced pressure, the residue was washed with water.
The product was dried under reduced pressure. Yield: 22.2% (17.6 mg,
0.040 mmol). 1HNMR (500 MHz, D2O): δ
3.19 (s, 9H, CH3−), 3.50 (t, 2H, J = 7.44 Hz, −CH2CH2−), 4.40 (t,
2H, J = 7.44, −CH2CH2−), 4.02 (s, 3H, CH3O−), 7.02 (d, 1H, J = 8.02 Hz, naphthalimide), 7.55 (t, 1H, J = 8.02, naphthalimide), 8.17 (d, 1H, J = 7.98 Hz,
naphthalimide), 8.24 (d, 1H, J = 7.45 Hz, naphthalimide),
8.34 (d, 1H, J = 8.59 Hz, naphthalimide) ppm. ESI–MS m/z: calcd for [CH3O-TENI]+ = 313.1547; found, 313.1541. Elemental analysis calcd for
C18H21IN2O3 = C, 49.10;
H, 4.81; N, 6.36. Found: C, 49.26; H, 4.86; N, 6.08. FT-IR (neat,
cm–1) 780.99 (ArH), 1085.35 (C–O), 1268.50
(C–N), 1654.65 (C=O), 2973.00 (CH3).
3-Nitro-N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-NI
3-Nitro-1,8-naphthalic anhydride (0.51 g, 2.10 mmol) and N,N-dimethylethylenediamine (0.38 g, 4.11
mmol) were added to DMF (20 mL), and the solution was stirred at 90
°C for 3.5 h. The reaction solution was cooled to room temperature,
and then the product was precipitated out. The precipitated product
was corrected by filtration, followed by washing with water. The product
was dried under reduced pressure. Yield: 45.7% (0.30 g, 0.96 mmol). 1HNMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.34 (s, 6H, CH3−), 2.67 (t, 2H, J = 6.59 Hz, −CH2CH2−), 4.35 (t, 2H, J =
6.59 Hz, −CH2CH2−), 7.94 (t, 1H, J = 7.44 Hz, naphthalimide), 8.42 (d, 1H, J = 8.02 Hz, naphthalimide), 8.78 (d, 1H, J = 6.88
Hz, naphthalimide), 9.13 (s, 1H, naphthalimide), 9.32 (s, 1H, naphthalimide)
ppm.
3-Nitro-TENI Iodide
3-Nitro-N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-NI (0.20 g, 0.64 mmol) and methyliodide
(0.27 g, 1.90 mmol) were added to DMF (10 mL) and stirred for 1 h
at room temperature. After removal of DMF under reduced pressure,
the residue was washed by water. The product was dried under reduced
pressure. Yield: 51.5% (0.15 g, 0.33 mmol). 1HNMR (500
MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 3.20 (s, 9H, CH3−), 3.61 (t, 2H, J = 7.16 Hz, −CH2CH2−), 4.47 (t, 2H, J =
6.59 Hz, −CH2CH2−), 8.09 (t, 1H, J = 7.73 Hz, naphthalimide), 8.72 (d, 1H, J = 6.87 Hz, naphthalimide), 8.83 (d, 1H, J = 7.45
Hz, naphthalimide), 8.93 (s, 1H, naphthalimide), 9.52 (s, 1H, naphthalimide)
ppm. ESI–MS m/z: calcd for
[NO2-TENI]+ = 328.1292; found, 328.1286. Elemental
analysis calcd for C17H18IN3O4 = C, 44.85; H, 3.99; N, 9.23. Found: C, 44.62; H, 3.92; N,
9.06. FT-IR (neat, cm–1) 785.82 (ArH), 1248.02 (C–N),
1542.33 (N–O), 1350.92 (N–O), 1661.82 (C=O).
1,4,5,8-Naphthalenetetracarboxylic dianhydride (1.50 g, 5.59 mmol)
and N,N-dimethylethylenediamine
(4.90 g, 0.06 mol) were added to DMF (20 mL), and the solution was
stirred at 100 °C for 6 h. The reaction solution was cooled to
room temperature, and then the product was precipitated out. The precipitated
product was corrected by filtration, followed by washing with water.
The product was dried under reduced pressure. Yield: 42.4% (0.97 g,
2.37 mmol). 1HNMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ
= 2.34 (s, 12H, CH3−), 2.67 (t, 4H, J = 6.59 Hz, −CH2CH2−), 4.35 (t,
4H, J = 6.87 Hz, −CH2CH2−), 8.76 (s, 4H, naphthalimide) ppm.
N,N′-Bis[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-1,8:4,5-naphthalenetetracarboxdiimide
(0.51 g, 1.25 mmol) and methyliodide (1.05 g, 7.40 mmol) were added
to DMF (20 mL) and stirred for 1 h at room temperature. After removal
of DMF under reduced pressure, the residue was washed by water. The
product was dried under reduced pressure. Yield: 56.8% (0.49 g, 0.71
mmol). 1HNMR (500 MHz, D2O) δ = 3.35
(s, 18H, CH3−), 3.73 (t, 4H, J =
7.45 Hz, −CH2CH2−),4.69 (t, 4H, J = 7.45 Hz, −CH2CH2−),
8.81 (s, 4H, naphthalimide) ppm. ESI–MS m/z: calcd for [TENDI]2+ = 219.1128; found, 219.1120.
Elemental analysis calcd for C24H30I2N4O4 = C, 41.64; H, 4.37; N, 8.09. Found: C,
41.43; H, 4.12; N, 8.08. FT-IR (neat, cm–1) 782.15
(ArH), 1187.07 (C–N), 1657.09 (C=O), 3031.61 (CH3).
N-(Methoxypolyethylene
glycol)-NI
1,8-Naphthalic anhydride (13.2 mg, 66.7 μmol)
and methoxypolyethylene glycol amine 750 (51.2 mg, 68.3 μmol)
were added to DMF (8 mL), and the solution was stirred at 100 °C
for 5 h. The reaction solution was evaporated. Water (10 mL) was added
to the residue and filtered to remove unreacted 1,8-naphthalic anhydride.
The filtrate was evaporated and the residue was washed with diethyl
ether. The product was dried under reduced pressure. Yield: 23.0%
(14.3 mg, 15.3 μmol).1HNMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.38 (s, 3H, CH3−), 3.47-3.71 (m, 66H,
PEG), 3.82 (t, 2H, J = 6.30 Hz, −CH2CH2−), 4.45 (t, 2H, J = 6.30 Hz,
−CH2CH2−), 7.76 (t, 2H, J = 7.73 Hz, naphthalimide) ppm, 8.22 (d, 2H, J = 8.02 Hz, naphthalimide), 8.61 (d, 2H, J = 7.45
Hz, naphthalimide) ppm.
Photo-Induced
Colorimetric Reaction
An aqueous solution of 1.5 mM TENI
or 1.5 mM TENI analogues and 6.0
mM sodium succinate were added to a quartz cell (path length: 1 mm)
and irradiated with UV light from an SP-7 spot cure unit (Ushio, Tokyo)
equipped with a deep UV lamp (main wavelength: 365 nm) at room temperature
for 5 min. The length between the quartz cell and the UV lamp was
19.2 cm (8 mW/cm2). After irradiation, the irradiated solution
was immediately subjected to UV–vis measurement.
Photo-Induced Reduction of Methylene Blue
Mediated by TENI
Methylene blue (MB, 0.25 mM)/1.5 mM TENI/6.0
mM sodium succinate aqueous solution, 0.25 mM MB/1.5 mM TENI aqueous
solution, or 0.25 mM MB/1.5 mM TENI/12.0 mM sodium acetate placed
in a quartz cell (path length: 1 mm) was UV-irradiated by the same
procedure as used for the photo-induced colorimetric reaction. After
irradiation, the irradiated solution was immediately subjected to
UV–vis measurement.
Binding Constant between
TENI and Succinate/Acetate
The binding constants (M–1) between TENI and
succinate/acetate were estimated from 1HNMR measurements.
A Benesi–Hildebrand-type equation[27] was employedwhere δ, δ0, K, and a are the chemical shifts of a signal
attributed to an aromatic proton of TENI in the presence and absence
of sodium succinate/acetate, the binding constant, and a molecular
extinction coefficient, respectively.
Computational
Details
The computations
for the complex formed between TENI and acetate were performed by
the density functional theory (DFT) method as implemented in Gaussian16.[28] In order to include the non-bonding interaction,
we used the X3LYP functionals with the 6-31G* basis set. We confirmed
that the complex lies at a stable state by computing the normal mode
of frequency. To compute the vertically excited energy, we used the
time-dependent DFT, where the lowest 15 states are computed.
Results and Discussion
UV–Vis and Fluorescence
Spectra of
TENI, CH3O-TENI, NO2-TENI, and TENDI
Figure A shows the
UV–vis spectra of 1.5 mM TENI, CH3O-TENI, NO2-TENI, and TENDI in aqueous solutions. TENI showed an absorbance
peak attributable to the one-electron HOMO–LUMO transition
at around 345 nm; this was identical to the result for MNEI (Figure ).[17] In CH3O-TENI, an absorbance peak was observed
at around 375 nm, which was shifted to higher wavelength compared
to TENI by virtue of push–pull internal charge transfer.[6] In NO2-TENI, absorbance peaks appeared
at around 275 and 345 nm. This observation is consistent with the
absorbance peak of 3-nitro-N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-NI
(mitonafide).[29] We suppose that this appearance
of two absorbance peaks is due to the position of the nitro group
because 4-nitro-NI derivatives did not show such absorbance pattern[30] and similar absorbance bands were observed in
3-substituted NI derivatives.[31] The absorbance
peak of TENDI below 400 nm was identical to the previously reported
absorbance peak of TENDI.[24,32] These results indicate
the production of TENI analogues having different HOMO–LUMO
gaps.
Figure 2
UV–vis spectra of 1.5 mM TENI, CH3O-TENI, NO2-TENI, and TENDI aqueous solutions (A) and fluorescence spectra
of 1.5 mM TENI (excited at 380 nm), CH3O-TENI (excited
at 310 nm), and TENDI (excited 260 nm) aqueous solutions (B). Excitation
spectra are shown in Figure S4.
Figure 3
Orbitals of the TENI and acetate complex at the X3LYP/6-31G* level.
The values are the relative orbital energies to HOMO of the complex
(the values in parentheses are in Eh).
HOMO – 2, HOMO – 1, and HOMO of acetate lie between
the HOMO and LUMO of TENI. The absorption wavelength from HOMO to
LUMO excitation of TENI is computed as 329.93 nm through time-dependent
DFT at the X3LYP/6-31G* level.
UV–vis spectra of 1.5 mM TENI, CH3O-TENI, NO2-TENI, and TENDI aqueous solutions (A) and fluorescence spectra
of 1.5 mM TENI (excited at 380 nm), CH3O-TENI (excited
at 310 nm), and TENDI (excited 260 nm) aqueous solutions (B). Excitation
spectra are shown in Figure S4.Orbitals of the TENI and acetatecomplex at the X3LYP/6-31G* level.
The values are the relative orbital energies to HOMO of the complex
(the values in parentheses are in Eh).
HOMO – 2, HOMO – 1, and HOMO of acetate lie between
the HOMO and LUMO of TENI. The absorption wavelength from HOMO to
LUMO excitation of TENI is computed as 329.93 nm through time-dependent
DFT at the X3LYP/6-31G* level.Figure B shows
the fluorescence spectra of 1.5 mM TENI, CH3O-TENI, and
TENDI aqueous solutions. In the spectra of TENI, a monomer fluorescence
peak at around 395 nm and an excimer fluorescence peak at around 500
nm were shown; these were identical to the results for MNEI.[17] In CH3O-TENI, a strong fluorescence
emission peak was detected at around 465 nm; however, an excimer fluorescence
emission peak was not observed, suggesting that the NI derivative
having an electron-donated naphthalene ring was not suitable for the
excimer formation. In the case of NO2-TENI, the fluorescence
emission peak was not detected. In TENDI, although the maximum fluorescence
intensities were approximately one-tenth of those observed for TENI,
the monomer fluorescence emission peak was detectable at around 410
nm.
Photo-Induced Colorimetric Reactions of TENI,
CH3O-TENI, NO2-TENI, and TENDI
Succinate
was the simplest molecule to induce the colorimetric reaction of MNEI
by UV light irradiation.[21] Therefore, the
photo-induced colorimetric reactions of TENI, CH3O-TENI,
NO2-TENI, and TENDI in the presence of sodium succinate
were investigated (Figure ). In TENI, the solution turned yellow under UV light irradiation
and the appearance and decrease of absorbance peaks were observed
at around 430 nm and at around 345 nm, respectively. This yellow color
was completely disappeared after 72 h. However, the absorbance peak
at around 345 nm was not completely restored, suggesting decomposition
of TENI. In addition, the colorimetric reaction was not observed in
the presence of 12 mM sodium acetate but was observed in the presence
of 150 mM sodium acetate (Figure S2).[20] These observations were the same as those for
MNEI described in the Introduction section.
In contrast, the photo-induced colorimetric reaction was not observed
on CH3O-TENI, suggesting that electron donation from a
substituent prevented the colorimetric reaction. Interestingly, in
NO2-TENI and TENDI, which have an electron-deficient naphthalene
ring, the solution colors changed to magenta, and broad absorbance
peaks were observed at 400–600 nm. The color change on TENDI
was particularly remarkable. The broad absorbance peak observed in
TENDI agrees with the previously reported absorbance peak due to an
NDI-based radical anion.[24] In addition,
the absorbance peak appearing on TENI at around 345 nm shows good
agreement with that of the NI-based radical anion.[33,34] These results suggest that the photo-induced colorimetric reaction
in the presence of succinate was the production of radical anion via
PET from carboxylate to the electron-deficient naphthalene ring. The
finding that there was no color change in CH3O-TENI was
a reasonable result under this hypothesis because CH3O-TENI
has an electron-rich naphthalene ring that does not readily accept
an electron. Moreover, the phenomenon of the yellow color disappearing
under O2 is also consistent with the property of radicals.
Note that the finding that there was no color change in the absence
of succinate was confirmed in the above derivatives.
Figure 4
UV–vis spectra
of 1.5 mM TENI (A), CH3O-TENI
(B), NO2-TENI (C), and TENDI (D) aqueous solutions in the
presence of 6.0 mM sodium succinate before and after UV light irradiation.
Multi-views are photo–images of the respective solutions after
UV light irradiation.
UV–vis spectra
of 1.5 mM TENI (A), CH3O-TENI
(B), NO2-TENI (C), and TENDI (D) aqueous solutions in the
presence of 6.0 mM sodium succinate before and after UV light irradiation.
Multi-views are photo–images of the respective solutions after
UV light irradiation.
Verification
of the Occurrence of PET from Succinate to TENI
Although
we performed an electron spin resonance (ESR) analysis of the TENI
system to confirm that radical anions are generated by UV light irradiation,
we could not observe any significant signals, probably due to the
difficulty of ESR measurement in water and/or the low radical concentration.
Therefore, we carried out verification experiments using 1HNMR analysis, with the expectation that the signals for paramagnetic
molecules would disappear, broaden, and/or shift.[32]Figure shows the 1HNMR spectra of 1.5-mM TENI-D2O solution in the presence of 6.0 mM sodium succinate before and
after UV light irradiation. The integration values of signals due
to TENI were clearly decreased by UV light irradiation. We speculated
that the signals disappeared or broadened due to conversion of TENI
to a paramagnetic radical anion. The integration values for signals
due to the NI group (d–f) were decreased to ca. 40% compared
to those before UV light irradiation. In addition, the signals attributed
to trimethylammonium protons (a) became complex, with shifted and
broadened signals being observed at around 3.0–3.2 ppm. This
change after UV light irradiation was not observed in 1.5 mM TENI-D2O solution in the presence of 12.0 mM sodium acetate, which
did not exhibit the yellowing reaction, as shown in Figure S2A (Figure S3). These results
support the idea that the radical anion was generated.
Figure 5
1H NMR spectra
of 1.5 mM TENI-D2O solution
in the presence of 6.0 mM sodium succinate before and after UV light
irradiation. DMF was added as an internal standard to estimate the
integration values.
1HNMR spectra
of 1.5 mM TENI-D2O solution
in the presence of 6.0 mM sodium succinate before and after UV light
irradiation. DMF was added as an internal standard to estimate the
integration values.In
order to confirm that the electrochemical
redox reaction of TENI occurred, (CV) measurement of an aqueous KCl
(10 mM) solution of TENI (1.5 mM) was made at a 50 mV/s scan rate
under an argon atmosphere (Figure ). The blank measurement was also performed at the
same scan rate (50 mV/s) in the absence of TENI. The CV of TENI showed
a reversible one-electron redox wave at −1.1 V, indicating
that a one-electron reduction state of TENI is plausible.
Figure 6
Cyclic voltammograms
of a 10 mM KCl aqueous solution of 1.5 mM
TENI-I.
Cyclic voltammograms
of a 10 mM KCl aqueous solution of 1.5 mM
TENI-I.In order to further verify the
generation of a radical anion, the
photo-induced reduction of MB, which is a dye bleached by reduction,
was carried out: if the radical anion was generated via the PET from
the carboxy group to TENI, the MB would be immediately reduced by
the radical anion (Figure A). Figure B shows the UV–vis spectra of 0.25 mM MB/1.5 mM TENI/6.0 mM
sodium succinate, 0.25 mM MB/1.5 mM TENI, and 0.25 mM MB/1.5 mM TENI/12.0
mM sodium acetate aqueous solutions before and after UV light irradiation.
In the presence of TENI and succinate, the absorbance peak due to
MB at around 450–750 nm was remarkably reduced after UV light
irradiation. In contrast, such a reduction was not observed in the
absence of TENI. In addition, when 12.0 mM acetate was used instead
of 6.0 mM sodium succinate, the reduction was not observed. The conditions
under which the reduction of MB occurred were consistent with the
photo-induced colorimetric reaction, indicating that TENI was converted
to the radical anion via PET and that TENI functioned as the reductant.
Figure 7
Redaction
of MB mediated by TENI (A). The UV–vis spectra
of 0.25 mM MB/1.5 mM TENI/6.0 mM sodium succinate (red lines), 0.25
mM MB/1.5 mM TENI (blue lines), and 0.25 mM MB/1.5 mM TENI/12.0 mM
sodium acetate aqueous solutions (yellow lines) before (solid lines)
and after (dashed lines) UV light irradiation (B). Photos of 0.25
mM MB/1.5 mM TENI/6.0 mM sodium succinate aqueous solution before
and after UV light irradiation are also shown (C).
Redaction
of MB mediated by TENI (A). The UV–vis spectra
of 0.25 mM MB/1.5 mM TENI/6.0 mM sodium succinate (red lines), 0.25
mM MB/1.5 mM TENI (blue lines), and 0.25 mM MB/1.5 mM TENI/12.0 mM
sodium acetate aqueous solutions (yellow lines) before (solid lines)
and after (dashed lines) UV light irradiation (B). Photos of 0.25
mM MB/1.5 mM TENI/6.0 mM sodium succinate aqueous solution before
and after UV light irradiation are also shown (C).
Effect of Irradiation Wavelength on the Photo-Induced
Colorimetric Reaction of TENI
The effect of irradiation wavelength
on the PET was investigated by using the excitation light of the fluorescence
spectrometer where 1.5 mM TENI aqueous solution containing 0.5 wt
% sodium polyacrylate was placed in the fluorescence spectrometer
and the excitation ray with controlled wavelength was irradiated for
5 min. The color change on the ray-irradiated part was observed visually
because the diffusion of the yellow color was very slow in the high
viscous solution. Figure shows the photos of the solutions after 250–400 nm
UV light irradiation. In the experiment using 350 nm irradiation,
which is close to the maximum absorbance wavelength, the light-irradiated
part clearly became yellow. The yellow colors were gradually diluted
with increasing/decreasing wavelengths of irradiated rays. The colorimetric
reaction was not observed in the experiments using 250 and 400 nm
of rays. This observation was consistent with the absorbance peak
(300–380 nm) of TENI, as shown in Figure A, indicating that the PET occurred via the
HOMO–LUMO transition. The same result was observed for TENDI
(Figure S5).
Figure 8
Photos of the TENI solutions
containing 0.5 wt % sodium polyacrylate
after UV light irradiation at various wavelengths (◎: significantly
change, ○: moderately change, △: slightly change, and
×: no change).
Photos of the TENI solutions
containing 0.5 wt % sodium polyacrylate
after UV light irradiation at various wavelengths (◎: significantly
change, ○: moderately change, △: slightly change, and
×: no change).
Clarification
of the Role of the Cationic
Receptor for the Photo-Induced Colorimetric Reaction
TENI
has an open space between the cationic receptor and the NI group that
can trap various anion species.[17] Therefore,
we consider that the cationic receptor should play a role in capturing
the carboxy group and in turn should be related to the photo-induced
colorimetric reaction. In order to verify the roles of the cationic
receptor, the photo-induced colorimetric reaction of the NI derivatives
having different substituents instead of the cationic group (Figure B) was investigated.
Panels A and D in Figure show the UV–vis spectra of 1.5 mM DENI, having a dimethylamino
group, in the presence and absence of sodium succinate, respectively,
before and after UV light irradiation. Although the spectra of the
TENI aqueous solution exhibit almost no change by UV irradiation (Figure F), the colorimetric
reaction of DENI was observed in the absence of succinate (Figure D). This result suggests
the occurrence of PET from a lone pair on the dimethylamino group,
as previously reported in NDI derivatives.[35] Furthermore, this result provides the important information that
the internal ET was prevented by the quaternization of the dimethyl
amino group by methylation. In the presence of succinate, the colorimetric
reaction of DENI was enhanced, indicating the occurrence of PET from
succinate, even though DENI has less positive charge than TENI. This
result made us skeptical about the necessity of the cationic receptor
for anion binding via electrostatic interaction to induce the colorimetric
reaction. Therefore, we next investigated PEGNI bearing a polyethylene
glycol (PEG) group (the number-average degree of polymerization estimated
by 1HNMR analysis was 16.5) that is nonionic and hydrophilic
(Figure B). Surprisingly,
although the visibility of the colorimetric reaction was lower than
that of TENI, the absorbance peak at around 430 nm was clearly observed.
This absorbance peak was remarkably larger than that in the negative
control experiment (Figure E). This result indicates that the generation of the NI-based
radical anion via PET does not require the cationic receptors, but
the cationic group promotes the photo-induced colorimetric reaction.
In our previous work, the importance of aggregation to the photo-induced
colorimetric reaction was suggested.[20,21] PEGNI is an
amphiphilic molecule, and thus, hydrophobicNI groups should be aggregated
in water as micelles. Thus, we conjecture that aggregation of the
NI groups contributes to the generation and/or stabilization of the
radical anion in the PEGNI system.
Figure 9
UV–vis spectra of 1.5 mM DENI (A)
and PEGNI (B) aqueous
solution in the presence of 6.0 mM sodium succinate before and after
UV light irradiation and their time profiles of the absorbance at
430 nm after UV light irradiation (C). Negative controls: UV–vis
spectra of 1.5 mM DENI (D), PEGNI (E), and TENI (F) aqueous solution
before and after UV light irradiation.
UV–vis spectra of 1.5 mM DENI (A)
and PEGNI (B) aqueous
solution in the presence of 6.0 mM sodium succinate before and after
UV light irradiation and their time profiles of the absorbance at
430 nm after UV light irradiation (C). Negative controls: UV–vis
spectra of 1.5 mM DENI (D), PEGNI (E), and TENI (F) aqueous solution
before and after UV light irradiation.Figure C shows
the time profile of the absorbance at 430 nm in the TENI, DENI, and
PEGNI systems after UV light irradiation. The decrease in the absorbance
peak at around 430 nm in the PEGNI system was faster than the corresponding
decrease in the TENI and DENI systems, indicating that the cationic
receptor contributes to the stabilization of the radical anion. In
addition, we conjecture that the radical anion was additionally stabilized
via aggregation as described above because the lifetimes of the previously
reported NI-based radical anions were on the order of microsecond,[33,34] and the generation of the semi-stable radical anion of PEGNI is
implausible without stabilizing effects.
Mechanism
of Generation of the TENI-Based
Radical Anion
As described above, the appropriate electron
donors for the photo-induced colorimetric reaction are molecules having
multiple carboxy groups or amphiphiliccarboxylate.[21] In the case of acetate, a ca. 30-fold higher acetateconcentration
toward TENI was necessary for the detectable colorimetric reaction.[20] The difference in binding constants between
TENI and donor molecules is one of the possible reasons for the difficulty
of the reaction in the case of acetate. Therefore, we estimated the
binding constant between TENI and succinate or acetate from 1HNMR analysis (Figures S6). The binding
constant between TENI and succinate was only ca. 3-fold higher (227
M–1) than that between TENI and acetate (78 M–1), which can be explained by the number of carboxy
groups. It is unlikely that this small difference was the reason for
the difficulty for PET observed in the TENI-acetate system. We conjecture
that the enhancement of aggregation of TENI, which would accelerate
and/or stabilize the radical anion species as described above, is
a plausible reason for the importance of multiple carboxy groups.In the presence of I– or Br–,
MNEI/TENI showed strong fluorescence quenching via PET (Figure S1).[18,19] In these cases,
it can be considered that the generated MNEI/TENI radical anion rapidly
deactivated via ET from the MNEI/TENI radical anion to the I radical
cation. Therefore, the radical anion was not generated in the presence
of I– and Br– even though PET
occurred. A very low level of quenching of TENI via PET occurred in
the presence of acetate (Figure S1). This
is consistent with the results of the computational simulation, which
indicated that HOMO – 2, HOMO – 1, and HOMO of acetate
lie between HOMO and LUMO of TENI (Figure ). However, the radical anion was hardly
observed in the presence of 8 equiv of acetate. We consider that the
reason for this finding was the same as in the cases of Br– and I–; that is, the most generated radical anion
was rapidly deactivated via ET in the case of acetate (Figure A). In our previous report,
the importance of the bulkiness of carboxylate molecules for the colorimetric
reaction was suggested by machine leaning analysis.[21] Based on these previous results, we conjecture that the
generation of the semi-stable radical anion was caused by the release
of a bulky donor molecule having carboxylates; that is, the radical
anion was generated via the PET arising on an unstable complex between
the NI group and the carboxy group and subsequent release of the carboxy
group (Figure B).
In addition, the radical anion was probably stabilized via aggregation
as described above. Note that the acetate system is able to generate
the radical anion in very lower probability than the succinate system
because the colorimetric reaction was observed in the presence of
a large amount of acetate.
Figure 10
Plausible mechanism of the non-radiative deactivation
in the presence
of acetate (A) and of the generation of the radical anion in the presence
of succinate (B).
Plausible mechanism of the non-radiative deactivation
in the presence
of acetate (A) and of the generation of the radical anion in the presence
of succinate (B).
Conclusions
In order to clarify the mechanism underlying the photo-induced
colorimetric reaction observed in NI derivatives having a cationic
receptor linking via an N-ethyl linker, such as MNEI
and TENI, toward carboxylate derivatives, we investigated the photo-induced
colorimetric reaction of TENI, CH3O-TENI, NO2-TENI, and TENDI in the presence of sodium succinate. Although CH3O-TENI having the electron-donating group did not show the
colorimetric reaction, TENI, NO2-TENI, and TENDI show the
colorimetric reaction. In TENI, the solution turned yellow under UV
light irradiation. However, in NO2-TENI and TENDI, the
solution turned magenta. The absorbance peak observed in TENDI agreed
with that of the previously reported NDI-based radical anion. On the
basis of this observation, we assumed that the yellow chemical species
generated with the TENI system was NI-based radical anion, and this
assumption was confirmed by the 1HNMR and CV analyses,
and the photo-reduction of MB mediated by TENI. In addition, we revealed
the roles of cationic receptor for the photo-induced colorimetric
reaction. Although the colorimetric reaction does not require the
cationic receptor, because it was observed on nonionicPEGNI, the
cationic receptor plays a role in the stabilization of the radical
anion. In addition, we revealed that a lone pair of nitrogen and oxygen
in the receptor moiety induced the PET without carboxylate derivatives,
that is, the cation is the best receptor for this sensing system.
This mechanism would provide a sophisticated selective carboxylate
detection system.Based on the knowledge of the photo-induced
colorimetric reaction
obtained here and in our previous works, we conjecture that the keys
for the photo-induced colorimetric reaction are appropriate acidity
for the occurrence of PET and bulkiness of the carboxylate derivatives
to prevent non-radiative deactivation via ET after PET. In addition,
aggregation of the NI groups contributes to the generation and/or
stabilization of the radical anion. A detailed study of the aggregation
state is now in progress.
Authors: Rebecca M Duke; Emma B Veale; Frederick M Pfeffer; Paul E Kruger; Thorfinnur Gunnlaugsson Journal: Chem Soc Rev Date: 2010-09-06 Impact factor: 54.564
Authors: Swagata Banerjee; Emma B Veale; Caroline M Phelan; Samantha A Murphy; Gillian M Tocci; Lisa J Gillespie; Daniel O Frimannsson; John M Kelly; Thorfinnur Gunnlaugsson Journal: Chem Soc Rev Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 54.564