For the study, we prepared a low grain boundary three-dimensional CH3NH3PbI3 crystal (3D-MAPbI3) on TiO2 nanoarrays by inhibition of ammonium iodide and discussed the formation mechanism of the crystal. Based on the 3D-MAPbI3 crystal, solar cells showed modified performance with a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of up to 19.3%, which increases by 36.8% in contrast to the counterparts. We studied the internal photocurrent conversion process. The highest external quantum efficiency is up to 92%, and the electron injection efficiency is remarkably facilitated where the injection time decreases by 37.8% compared to the control group. In addition, based on 3D-MAPbI3, solar cells showed excellent air stability, which possesses 78.3% of the initial PCE, even though they were exposed to air for 30 days. Our results demonstrate a promising approach for the fabrication of perovskite solar cells with high efficiency and stability.
For the study, we prepared a low grain boundary three-dimensional CH3NH3PbI3 crystal (3D-MAPbI3) on TiO2 nanoarrays by inhibition of ammonium iodide and discussed the formation mechanism of the crystal. Based on the 3D-MAPbI3 crystal, solar cells showed modified performance with a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of up to 19.3%, which increases by 36.8% in contrast to the counterparts. We studied the internal photocurrent conversion process. The highest external quantum efficiency is up to 92%, and the electron injection efficiency is remarkably facilitated where the injection time decreases by 37.8% compared to the control group. In addition, based on 3D-MAPbI3, solar cells showed excellent air stability, which possesses 78.3% of the initial PCE, even though they were exposed to air for 30 days. Our results demonstrate a promising approach for the fabrication of perovskite solar cells with high efficiency and stability.
Organic–inorganic
hybrid perovskites have been considered
as potential materials in various fields due to their special chemical
structures and distinctive properties.[1−5] Since the first methylammonium lead halideperovskite (CH3NH3PbX3, X = Br or I) in an electrolyte-based
dye-sensitized solar cell was reported, scientists have researched
the perovskite-based photovoltaic devices widely. Up to now, based
on perovskite materials, solar cells have achieved outstanding improvements
with a power conversion efficiency (PCE) reaching 25.6%.[1,6−20] The increasing device PCE heralds a new rapid development era of
solar cells.One of the main issues that hinder the development
of perovskite
solar cells is poor stability.[21−25] To overcome the difficulty, numerous efforts were devoted to improve
the interface of the device, including developing various new electron
transport materials (ETMs),[26−30] hole transport materials (HTMs),[31−35] and prepared all-inorganic solar cells.[20,36] Scientists expect using various carrier materials to improve the
performance and even the stability. However, very few of the reported
materials have been able to achieve gratifying stability. In fact,
the general engineering of the interface facilitates the charging
transfer behavior by providing effective charging transport channels.[18,28,37−40] The transporting process of the
carrier, especially the transporting speed (injection rate) between
the donor and the receiver, has not been greatly improved.In
addition, obtained by the one-step method, perovskite crystals
usually have many morphologic defects because of the heterogeneous
growth during the evaporation of the solvents. For perovskite, during
the complete transformation from precursor materials to crystals,
the morphology of the film presents a large number of pinhole defects,
which is harmful to the performance of the device. To overcome the
obstacle, a great variety of traditional technologies were attempted
preliminarily, such as the roll-to-roll method, doctor-blading process,
spray coating, inkjet printing, slot-die printing, and so on.[41−46] However, the perovskite materials obtained by these methods are
either too expensive or poor on the performance, which makes it difficult
to popularize in reality.In addition, there are many defects
in perovskite crystals synthesized
by chemical methods. These defects are harmful to the inner carrier
transport of the device. Therefore, as for perovskite, to reduce or
repair the defects in the crystal effectively has become one of the
key challenges. In previous reports, synthesized by the gas phase
method, perovskite can reduce the crystal defects[47−49] effectively.
However, there are no suitable gas phase methods to synthesize low-defect
perovskite crystals except for the traditional chemical vapor deposition
(CVD) method, which is reported to be the main one,[13,47] but this kind of method has many disadvantages, such as high energy
consumption, high price, and inability to be applied or promoted.[50] In view of this, scientists gradually developed
and utilized different gas phase methods, such as the spray deposition
method,[51,52] gas post-treatment,[53] gas-assisted crystallization,[54] and so
on. However, the obvious disadvantage of these methods is the simple
use of methyl ammonia gas for repair. It has not been well studied
on controlling the process of growth to improve the morphology and
structure of crystals.Hereinafter, we reported a three-dimensional
(3D) perovskite crystal
on TiO2 nanoarrays (TiO2-NAs) with low grain
boundaries by introducing ammonium iodide into the film. We also studied
the formation process and defect repair mechanism of the crystal.
Consequently, we reported 3D-MAPbI3-based solar cells with
improved performance and air stability. We also discussed the reasons
for the improvement on the performance of the device. Notably, the
electron transport layer is the TiO2 array rather than
mesoporousTiO2. The main reasons for choosing the TiO2 nanoarray as the ETM are as follows: (i) TiO2 nanoarrays
have good single-crystal properties and one-dimensional phase extractions,
which can provide more contact sites and effective charging transport
channels for fast electron transports due to the high uniform structures;[27] (ii) there are almost no deep insights into
the healing process upon the perovskite/two-dimensional nanoarray
interface; (iii) the mesoporousTiO2 (m-TiO2) film is normally used for the ETM in perovskite solar cells to
increase the contact area,[55] but the crystallinity
and the surface area of such TiO2 thin films are not satisfactory.[15] Additionally, by using the simple spin-coating
methods, perovskite crystals formed on mesoporousTiO2 films
obtain two-dimensional (2D) flat films, which reduce the contact interface
between perovskite and TiO2 films as well.
Experimental Section
Materials and Methods
All the materials
were bought from commercial sources for use. We recorded the UV–vis
measurements to test the absorption properties of the samples (Agilent
Cary 300) and X-ray diffraction to test the crystal of the samples
(D/MAX 2500, Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.5405 Å). We characterized
the morphology by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements
(Tecnai G2 F20 S-TWIN transmission electron microscope) and scanning
electron microscopy (SEM) measurements (JEOL S-4800 field-emission
scanning electron microscope). Time-resolved photoluminescence measurements
were performed on a fluorescence spectrometer (FLS980, excitation
source: 560 nm). The obtained decay curves were fitted with exponential
functions (χ2 = 0.9–1.1).
Preparation of TiO2 Nanoarrays
We prepared
the TiO2 nanoarrays by using hydrothermal
methods.[27] Typically, we added 50 mL of
37% HCl and 50 mL of distilled water into a 250 mL flask with stirring
for 15 min to form homogeneous solutions. Then, we transferred the
solutions into an FTO-embedded Teflon-lined hydrothermal reaction
vessel. Afterward, we added 1 mL of isopropyl titanate into the vessel
and sonicated the mixture for 5 min. Finally, we heated the vessel
at 180 °C for 90 min to obtain the TiO2 nanoarrays.
For comparison, we prepared m-TiO2 by referring to a previous
report.[56]
Preparation
of MAPbI3 Precursor
Solution
We synthesized CH3NH3I by
the one-step method in the literature.[57] Methylamine (24 mL, 33% in absolute ethanol) was reacted with hydroiodic
acid (10 mL, 57% in water) under a nitrogen atmosphere in 100 mL of
ethanol for 2 h. After the evaporation of the mixture, a white-colored
powder was formed to obtain the CH3NH3I crystal.
We prepared the MAPbI3 precursor solution by blending 0.463
g of PbI2 and 0.447 g of CH3NH3I
(mole ratio 1:3) in 3 mL of DMF solution.
Fabrication
and Characterization of the Device
First, we added 0.1 mL
of MAPbI3 precursor solution
onto the TiO2-NAs/FTO thin film and directly annealed at
80 °C for 30 min under an air atmosphere to assemble the MAPbI3 crystal. Then, we spin-coated 50 μL of NH4I in ethanol (0.1 M) onto the films and heated at 60 °C for
12 h to form a uniform film (the synthesis process is displayed in Figure ). After that, we
spin-coated a chlorobenzene solution containing 68 mM Spiro-MeOTAD,
55 mM tert-butylpyridine, and 9 mM lithium bis(trifluoromethylsyfonyl)imide
salt on the active layer at a rate of 2000 rpm for 40 s. Finally,
we deposited 200 nm Au onto the Spiro-MeOTAD surface (a device area
of 0.12 cm2). We measured the current–voltage (J–V) characteristics of the devices
on a solar simulator under a simulated AM1.5G spectrum at 100 mW cm–2 (Newport Oriel Sol 2A) and the external quantum efficiency
(EQE) of the devices to test the inner photocurrent (QTest Station
500 USA).
Figure 1
Synthesis process of the 3D-MAPbI3 crystal.
Synthesis process of the 3D-MAPbI3 crystal.
Results and Discussion
Figure a shows
the top-view SEM image of the untreated MAPbI3 crystal
on TiO2-NAs. MAPbI3 is rough with lots of holes,
and the crystal structure is loose. However, after 3 h of treatment
with NH4I, the perovskite crystals began to aggregate and
grow into large films (Figure b). When the treatment continued for 24 h, the perovskite
crystal was restored to a more complete dense layer (Figure c). This indicates that NH4I possesses the ability to repair the crystal into a block
film. Figure d shows
the cross-sectional image of NH4I-treated perovskite on
TiO2-NAs. Obviously, the TiO2 nanoarray has
fully penetrated the perovskite crystals and the thickness of the
compact perovskite on TiO2-NAs is calculated to be about
500–600 nm. Thus, the crystal forms a dense, smooth, and uniform
three-dimensional structure. However, the MAPbI3 crystal
on TiO2-NAs without NH4I treatment (Figure S1) is rather rough with lots of grain
boundaries and not completely filled in TiO2-NAs. Notably,
although grain boundaries are still observed on the surface of 3D-MAPbI3 crystals, the number has been greatly reduced.
Figure 2
(a) Top-view
SEM image of MAPbI3 on TiO2-NA
films without ammonium iodide; (b) MAPbI3 on TiO2-NA films treated with NH4I for 3 h; (c) MAPbI3 on TiO2-NA films treated with NH4I for 24
h; (d) cross-sectional SEM images of MAPbI3 films on TiO2-NAs after NH4I treatment for 24 h.
(a) Top-view
SEM image of MAPbI3 on TiO2-NA
films without ammonium iodide; (b) MAPbI3 on TiO2-NA films treated with NH4I for 3 h; (c) MAPbI3 on TiO2-NA films treated with NH4I for 24
h; (d) cross-sectional SEM images of MAPbI3 films on TiO2-NAs after NH4I treatment for 24 h.Figure a
and Figure b show
the SEM and
TEM images of the as-synthesized TiO2 nanoarrays, respectively.
The average diameter of the nanorods is estimated to be 50–80
nm, and the length is about 500 nm. Figure c shows the corresponding high-resolution
TEM (HRTEM) of the TiO2 nanoarrays. The interspace (0.335
nm) of the crystal is the reflection of the rutile TiO2 (101) plane.[27] We recorded the structures
by XRD patterns (Figure d). TiO2-NAs/FTO showed three peaks at 26.3, 35.8, and
37.7°, which agrees well with rutile TiO2.[58] For the CH3NH3PbI3 crystals, there are three new peaks that appeared at 14.2,
28.5, and 31.8° in both of the 3D-MAPbI3 films before
and after the NH4I treatment, which can be attributed to
the (110), (220), and (310) planes, respectively.[59] It is worth noticing that all the peak intensities in the
3D-MAPbI3 films after the NH4I treatment are
extremely enhanced. This means that the crystallized process that
occurred in the healing process is better. The XRD peak at 52°
in all films can be attributed to the subtraction of FTO. We tested
the absorption spectra to distinguish the absorption features of MAPbI3 films. As shown in Figure e, the 3D-MAPbI3 crystal showed broad absorption
bands at regions from 300 to 800 nm, which is in good agreement with
the previous work.[60] Compared to the untreated
films, the absorption intensities of 3D-MAPbI3 crystals
after the NH4I treatment are significantly increased, indicating
that a further assembly process occurs during the NH4I
treatment process. The formation of compact bulk crystals of perovskite
should be responsible for the high absorption effects.
Figure 3
(a) Cross-sectional SEM,
(b) TEM, and (c) HRTEM images of TiO2 nanoarrays; (d) XRD
patterns of MAPbI3 on TiO2 nanoarrays and (e)
absorption spectra of MAPbI3 thin films on glasses.
(a) Cross-sectional SEM,
(b) TEM, and (c) HRTEM images of TiO2 nanoarrays; (d) XRD
patterns of MAPbI3 on TiO2 nanoarrays and (e)
absorption spectra of MAPbI3 thin films on glasses.Based on the above results, we proposed the healing
mechanism.
Actually, the repairing process of the crystal is the reversible absorption/release
of the MA gas.[47] Therefore, in an effective
healing process, we should take two aspects into consideration: (i)
the transformation of the rough film (Figure a) into a smooth one (Figure c) through self-leveling; (ii) the slow release
of MA to produce a highly uniform and compact film. The whole process
involves an intermediate state (HPbI3) that is unstable
to release a small amount of HI molecules.[49] The relative equations are as followsTherefore, if we control the slow formation of intermediate
products
(HPbI3), then the whole chemical kinetic process will be
effectively controlled. According to this, we added ammonium iodide
to films to destroy the dynamic equilibrium process, as shown in formula . The main reason
for choosing ammonium iodide is that it is unstable and easy to decompose
into HI and ammonia gas under heating conditions. Because of the release
of HI from NH4I, the equilibrium process of the chemical
reaction in formula moves toward the direction of reactants. This inhibited the decomposition
of intermediate products and slowed down the release rate of methylamine
to a certain extent. With the slow decomposition and recrystallization
of perovskite molecules, new smooth, homogeneous, and large-scale
perovskite films are gradually formed. The whole phase transition
process can be reflected by SEM from Figure a–c.It is believed that the
loose structure of MAPbI3 before
the treatment provides an effective channel for the HI gas to enter
the array, which makes the perovskite phase transitions among the
titanium dioxide arrays proceed smoothly. Thus, the pore fillings
of the MAPbI3 molecules in TiO2 nanoarrays are
improved effectively. This effect can be easily observed by the cross-sectional
SEM images (Figure d).We fabricated the solar cells based on 3D-MAPbI3. The
energy-level diagrams of the solar cells are displayed in Figure a. All the energy
levels of the materials refer to our previous work.[27] In Figure b, we measured the J–V curves
of the champion solar cells scanned in forward and reverse directions.
The 3D-MAPbI3 device after the NH4I treatment
shows less hysteresis than the untreated device. Theoretically, in
the perovskite solar cells, accumulations of chargings or ions and
transferring imbalances of chargings at the interface between perovskite/ETM
should be responsible for the hysteresis. Based on MAPbI3 before NH4I treatment, solar cells achieved performance
of an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 1.04
V, a short-circuit current (Jsc) of 20.7
mA cm–2, a fill factor (FF) of 0.65, and a PCE of
14.1%. Compared to that, based on 3D-MAPbI3 after the NH4I treatment, the performance of the device showed significant
improvement where the Voc, Jsc, FF, and PCE are measured to be 1.04 V, 23.8 mA cm–2, 0.78, and 19.3%, respectively. The PCE increased
by nearly 36.8%. In addition, the Jsc and
FF (Table S1) based on 3D-MAPbI3 are remarkably improved, indicating that 3D-MAPbI3 is
the photovoltaic material that has more potential. It should be noted
that the Voc in both of the devices is
the same, suggesting that the Voc is mainly
dominated by the energy levels between MAPbI3 and TiO2 nanoarrays. To confirm the performance of the device, we
recorded 30 devices, and the average statistics are displayed in Table (Figures S3 and S4). The statistical data demonstrates that
the average performance has been improved for NH4I-treated
3D-MAPbI3-based devices.
Figure 4
(a) Energy-level diagram of the solar
cells based on 3D-MAPbI3; (b) J–V curves
and (c) dark J–V curves of
the devices; (d) corresponding EQE and calculated Jsc of the solar cells.
Table 1
Average Performances of 30 Devices
Based on MAPbI3 Crystals
devices
Voc (V)
Jsc (mA cm–2)
FF
PCE
(%)
before treatment
1.04 ± 0.1
19.6 ± 2.0
0.63 ± 0.3
12.8 ± 2.1
after NH4I treatment
1.04 ± 0.1
22.5 ±
1.8
0.76 ± 0.3
18.8 ± 2.0
(a) Energy-level diagram of the solar
cells based on 3D-MAPbI3; (b) J–V curves
and (c) dark J–V curves of
the devices; (d) corresponding EQE and calculated Jsc of the solar cells.To better understand
the transfer and recombination kinetics of
the charging, we studied the dark J–V data (Figure c), in which the curves are in good accordance with the Shockley
diode equationwhere n is
the ideality factor, k is the Boltzmann constant, J0 is the reverse saturation current density,
and T is the temperature in Kelvin. Compared with
the device before the NH4I treatment, solar cells treated
with NH4I showed lower J0 values
and inflection points, suggesting a charging contact, which is more
effective, for which the lower charging recombination and leakage
at the interface between 3D-MAPbI3 and TiO2-NAs
should be responsible.[61]Considering
the enhancement in Jsc,
we recorded the external quantum efficiency (EQE) spectra of the solar
cells (Figure d) to
further investigate the inner photocurrent conversion efficiency.
Both of the two MAPbI3-based devices showed a broad band
in the whole region from 400 to 800 nm. Based on MAPbI3, the highest EQE before treatment is 84%, while the EQE increases
dramatically for the devices based on 3D-MAPbI3 after the
NH4I treatment. The highest EQE reaches 92%, indicating
the improvement of Jsc. The integrated Jsc values from the EQE-based devices for MAPbI3 before and after the NH4I treatment are calculated
to be 19.9 and 23.1 mA cm2, respectively, which are quite
consistent with the J–V curves.The resistance (Rs) of the device mainly
reflects the FF. Generally speaking, a lower Rs indicates a higher FF. To conform the Jsc as well as the FF, we got deep investigations in the resistance
of the series by the typical equation (eq ),[62] where IL and I0 represent
the photocurrent (n = 1) and dark saturation current
(reverse polarization), respectively. q, T, K, and V are the values
of the charging, absolute temperature, Boltzmann constant, and bias
potential, respectively.Based
on MAPbI3 before and after NH4I treatment,
the Rs values of the devices are calculated
to be 9.55 and 4.6 Ω cm2. The change in Rs is likely to be related to the structure of the perovskite.
In heterostructure solar cells, the grain boundaries have strong influences
on performance parameters, and Rs increases
with increasing numbers of grain boundaries. The 3D-MAPbI3 solar cells are ascribed to the low Rs, probably as a result of there being fewer grain boundaries.[1]To study the characteristics of the charging
transport, we recorded
the time-resolved photoluminescence spectra (Figure a). For the pure MAPbI3 thin films
before and after the NH4I treatment, we measured the lifetimes
to be 14.2 and 18.1 ns, respectively. The longer lifetime in 3D-MAPbI3 thin films after the NH4I treatment suggests a
longer survival time of the exciton. In addition, we calculated the
charging transfer time (τCT) by a typical formula
(formula ) τfilm = 1/τMAPbI3 + 1/τCT,[63] where the τfilm and τMAPbI3 are the decay lifetimes of MAPbI3 on TiO2 nanoarrays and pure MAPbI3 films, respectively.
The τCT for MAPbI3 on TiO2 nanoarrays
before the treatment is estimated to be 15.0 ns, while the 3D-MAPbI3 crystal after the NH4I treatment shows a short
lifetime of 9.5 ns (Table ), which indicates that the electron injection between 3D-MAPbI3 and the layer of TiO2 nanoarrays is significantly
facilitated, and the injection time is improved by 37.8%.
Figure 5
(a) Time-resolved
photoluminescence measurements of the thin films;
(b) XRD patterns of MAPbI3/TiO2 thin films under
an air atmosphere for 30 days; (c, d) SEM images of the thin films
before and after the NH4I treatment under an air atmosphere
for 30 days.
Table 2
Photoluminescence
Lifetimes Measured
for Pure MAPbI3 Thin Films and 3D-MAPbI3 Thin
Films on TiO2 Nanoarrays (τfilm) and the
Estimated Transfer Time of the Charging Carrier (τCT)
thin films on glass/FTO
τfilm (ns)
τCT (ns)
MAPbI3 (before NH4I treatment)
14.2
MAPbI3 (before NH4I treatment)/TiO2
7.3
15.0
3D-MAPbI3 (after NH4I treatment)
18.1
3D-MAPbI3 (after NH4I treatment)/TiO2
6.2
9.4
(a) Time-resolved
photoluminescence measurements of the thin films;
(b) XRD patterns of MAPbI3/TiO2 thin films under
an air atmosphere for 30 days; (c, d) SEM images of the thin films
before and after the NH4I treatment under an air atmosphere
for 30 days.We further investigated
the stability of the thin films. We recorded
the XRD patterns of the crystal under an air atmosphere for 30 days
(Figure b). For both
of the MAPbI3 crystals before and after the NH4I treatment, a new XRD diffraction peak at 12.6° (PbI2) has appeared, suggesting the decomposition of crystals. Although
they are exposed to air for 30 days, the diffraction peak intensity
of PbI2 in 3D-MAPbI3 crystals after the NH4I treatment is much lower than that of MAPbI3 crystals
before the NH4I treatment, indicating that the 3D-MAPbI3 crystal after the NH4I treatment possesses better
air stability. To confirm that, we tested the SEM images of the MAPbI3 crystal after 30 days to observe the morphology (Figure c,d). Obviously,
crystal exposure to air for 30 days before the treatment (Figure c) showed a higher
degree of decomposition due to a large number of grain boundaries
because the crystal decomposition usually occurs at the grain boundaries.
On the contrary, the NH4I-treated crystals have better
morphology stability. This observation is quite consistent with the
previous discussion.Considering the advanced stability property
of the 3D-MAPbI3 crystals, we remeasured the J–V curves of the devices exposed to air for
30 days (Figure a).
The device based
on 3D-MAPbI3 before the NH4I treatment showed
a Voc of 0.99 V, a Jsc of 14.6 mA cm–2, a FF of 0.63, and a PCE
of 9.3% after exposure to air for 30 days. The PCE is 66% of the original
efficiency. By contrast, the devices based on 3D-MAPbI3 after the NH4I treatment showed an enhanced performance
with a Voc of 1.01 V, a Jsc of 20.1 mA cm–2, a FF of 0.74, and
a PCE of 15.1%, which possesses 78.3% of the original efficiency,
even though they are exposed to air for 30 days, which is much higher
than that of the device based on 3D-MAPbI3 after NH4I treatment.
Figure 6
(a) J–V curves
of the
devices after exposure to air for 30 days; the PCE retention rate
of the devices before and after the NH4I treatment (b,
c) after exposure to air for 30 days.
(a) J–V curves
of the
devices after exposure to air for 30 days; the PCE retention rate
of the devices before and after the NH4I treatment (b,
c) after exposure to air for 30 days.To further investigate the PCE retention rate of the solar cells
after exposure to air for 30 days, we counted 30 devices and obtained
the statistics of the PCE retention rate for 3D-MAPbI3 before
and after the NH4 treatment. For the devices based on MAPbI3 before the NH4 treatment, the average PCE retention
rate is calculated to be 65.6%, and the highest PCE retention rate
is 69%, while the average PCE retention rate for the 3D-MAPbI3 devices after the NH4 treatment is estimated to
be 78.1%, and the highest PCE retention is measured to be 85%. The
advanced air stability of the NH4I-treated solar cells
suggests the potential application of 3D-MAPbI3 in photovoltaic
devices.
Conclusions
In summary, we prepared
the 3D-MAPbI3 crystal with low
grain boundaries on TiO2 nanoarrays as well as proposed
and discussed the formation mechanism. The inhibition of ammonium
iodide came up for the first time. Solar cells based on 3D-MAPbI3 after the NH4I treatment showed a modified performance
as high as 17.6%, which increased by 36.8% in contrast to the counterpart.
Facts proved that, for the device, based on NH4I-treated
3D-MAPbI3 films, the EQE (92%) is significantly improved.
Moreover, the electron injection between the 3D-MAPbI3 layers
after the NH4I treatment and TiO2 nanoarrays
is remarkably facilitated. The total time of the electron injection
decreased by 37.8% compared to the control group. In addition, based
on 3D-MAPbI, solar cells showed excellent air stability, and the device
possesses 78.3% of the initial PCE, even though it is exposed to air
for 30 days. The devices based on NH4I-treated 3D-MAPbI3 showed an average PCE retention rate of 78.1%, much higher
than the counterpart. In view of the above results, it is believed
that the inhibition of ammonium iodide has positive effects on the
phase transformation and film formation for perovskite crystals, which
is adopted to produce advanced materials for fabrication of perovskite
photovoltaic devices with high efficiency and stability.
Authors: Jaeki Jeong; Minjin Kim; Jongdeuk Seo; Haizhou Lu; Paramvir Ahlawat; Aditya Mishra; Yingguo Yang; Michael A Hope; Felix T Eickemeyer; Maengsuk Kim; Yung Jin Yoon; In Woo Choi; Barbara Primera Darwich; Seung Ju Choi; Yimhyun Jo; Jun Hee Lee; Bright Walker; Shaik M Zakeeruddin; Lyndon Emsley; Ursula Rothlisberger; Anders Hagfeldt; Dong Suk Kim; Michael Grätzel; Jin Young Kim Journal: Nature Date: 2021-04-05 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Samuel D Stranks; Giles E Eperon; Giulia Grancini; Christopher Menelaou; Marcelo J P Alcocer; Tomas Leijtens; Laura M Herz; Annamaria Petrozza; Henry J Snaith Journal: Science Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 47.728