Narges Ataollahi1, Marica Broseghini2, Fabio F Ferreira3, Alberto Susana4, Massimo Pizzato4, Paolo Scardi1. 1. Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, Via Mesiano, 77, Trento 38123, Italy. 2. Helmholtz Zentrum Geesthacht (HZG), Institute of Coastal Research, Max-Planck-Straße 1, Geesthacht 21502, Germany. 3. Center for Natural and Human Sciences, Federal University of ABC, Santo André, SP 09210-580, Brazil. 4. Centre for Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Via Sommarive, 9, Trento 38123, Italy.
Abstract
The anti-HIV drug efavirenz (EFV) displays low and variable bioavailability because of its poor aqueous solubility. Ball milling is a simple and cost-effective alternative to traditional micronization to improve the solubility and dissolution rate of EFV. A multibody dynamics model was employed to optimize the milling process parameters, while the motion of the balls in the mill jar was monitored in operando. This led to a better understanding of the milling dynamics for efficient comminution and enhancement of EFV dissolution. The variability of results for different EFV batches was also considered. Depending on the EFV batch, there were intrinsic differences in how the milling affected the dissolution behavior and inhibition of HIV-1 infection. High-energy grinding is more effective on EFV materials containing an amorphous fraction; it helps to remove agglomeration and enhances dissolution. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) addition improves the dissolution by forming a hydrophilic layer on the EFV surface, thereby increasing the drug wettability. Polymorphism also affects the quality, dosage, and effectiveness of the drug. The mechanical stress effect and PVP addition on the EFV polymorphic transformation were monitored by X-ray powder diffraction, while the residual of ground EFV was collected after dissolution, analyzed by scanning electron microscopy, and provided insights into the morphological changes.
The anti-HIV drug efavirenz (EFV) displays low and variable bioavailability because of its poor aqueous solubility. Ball milling is a simple and cost-effective alternative to traditional micronization to improve the solubility and dissolution rate of EFV. A multibody dynamics model was employed to optimize the milling process parameters, while the motion of the balls in the mill jar was monitored in operando. This led to a better understanding of the milling dynamics for efficient comminution and enhancement of EFV dissolution. The variability of results for different EFV batches was also considered. Depending on the EFV batch, there were intrinsic differences in how the milling affected the dissolution behavior and inhibition of HIV-1 infection. High-energy grinding is more effective on EFV materials containing an amorphous fraction; it helps to remove agglomeration and enhances dissolution. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) addition improves the dissolution by forming a hydrophilic layer on the EFV surface, thereby increasing the drug wettability. Polymorphism also affects the quality, dosage, and effectiveness of the drug. The mechanical stress effect and PVP addition on the EFV polymorphic transformation were monitored by X-ray powder diffraction, while the residual of ground EFV was collected after dissolution, analyzed by scanning electron microscopy, and provided insights into the morphological changes.
Efavirenz
(EFV) is a reverse transcriptase inhibitor known for
the treatment of humanimmunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.[1−3] The solubility of a drug substance is one of the significant parameters
impacting absorption[4] as well as bioavailability,
defined as the fraction of the administered dose of a drug that enters
the systemic circulation, thereby accessing the site of action.[5] It is reported that EFV has a low aqueous solubility
(9.2 μg mL–1) (pH 8.7) at 25 °C,[6−8] higher as the pH increases above 9, for the proton loss on the carbamate
group’s amine.[6] Unfortunately, EFV
tends to be eliminated in the human systemic circulation before the
dissolution and absorption into the systemic circulation processes
are completed, therefore requiring an increased dosage to achieve
therapeutic levels in the body, often implying adverse effects for
the patient.[9−11] Several approaches to improve EFV dissolution were
reported using various carriers, including biosources[12] or synthetic routes.[13,14] These carriers have
interesting properties, including solubility in water and in a broad
range of liquid media, unique wetting, high chemical and thermal resistance,
biocompatibility, and the absence of toxicity, all necessary for different
applications as biomaterials, for medical and nonmedical uses.[15] Chemical and physical modifications of the compounds
have also been explored to overcome the limitation of poor solubility.
While the former route implies the design of new polymorphs often
followed by undesirable alterations of the biological effect, the
latter keeps it unchanged, requiring consequently a smaller amount
of in vitro and in vivo testing
procedures.The chemical methods such as PEGylation,[13] spray-drying,[10,16] and hot-melt[17,18] proved to have promising therapeutic potential. However, it is essential
to consider their limitations, including the need for expensive equipment,
particularly the parameters optimization, critical to obtain a stable
and reproducible nanosuspension with a uniform distribution. One of
the most common physical methods to enhance drug solubility is particle
size reduction.[19−21] This aims at increasing the surface area in contact
with the dissolution medium, S, which is proportional
to the dissolution rate, dC/dt,
as stated by the Nernst–Brunner equation[22]where D is
the diffusion coefficient, V is the volume of the
dissolution medium, h is the diffusion layer thickness, Cs is the saturation solubility, and C is the instantaneous concentration at time t.Different technologies are available for the production of
ultrafine
particles,[23,24] and micronization is the most
widely used by the pharmaceutical industry, employing, in particular,
air-jet mills.[10,19,25] Instead, ball milling exploits high-energy impacts and mechanical
attrition for comminution and disaggregation of particles and enhances
the dissolution rate of a drug.[3,26] Apart from size reduction,
milling can induce alterations of the drug particles (e.g., shape,
roughness, structural disorder, and defect content) that have a considerable
impact on dissolution, as revealed by several studies.[3,11,19,26] Therefore, to completely understand the phenomenon, the connections
with particle size and other physicochemical parameters should be
investigated.Since the end-product characteristics strongly
relate to the milling
parameters, the application of a multibody dynamics model of the planetary
ball mill, also supported by camera recordings of the process, was
crucial to predict the mill configuration providing with the more
significant reduction of particle size, possibly leading to a faster
and complete dissolution. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) was chosen as
a carrier because of its historical safety use in pharmaceutical formulations
and capability to prevent agglomeration; moreover, the influence of
distilled water and methanol on the dissolution behavior of ground
samples was investigated.To completely understand the dissolution
phenomenon, the morphology,
the vibrational spectra of as-milled samples, and their residuals
after the dissolution test were studied by scanning electron microscopy
(SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and Fourier transform
infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The mechanical grinding effects and
PVP on EFV’s polymorphic transformation were monitored by X-ray
powder diffraction (XRPD). Finally, the in vitro antiviral
activity of EFV samples was evaluated.
Results
and Discussion
The solubility is strongly influenced by the
presence and quantity
of agglomerated and dense particles in the raw EFV. Different batches
of pristine EFV have shown different dissolution behaviors, even though
they were produced under the same nominal conditions for synthesis,
and the pristine materials available in the market present the same
structure. The XRPD pattern of pristine EFV (Figure ) shows that batch B, with sharper Bragg
peaks and a lower diffuse signal, is well-crystalline compared to
batch A.
Figure 1
XRPD patterns (Co Kα radiation λ = 1.7889 Å) of
pristine EFV (batches A and B).
XRPD patterns (Co Kα radiation λ = 1.7889 Å) of
pristine EFV (batches A and B).In general, the dissolution profile of raw materials shows poor
solubility in distilled water with respect to methanol (40 wt %),
as displayed in Figure . However, batch B shows a slightly higher dissolution rate, both
in distilled water and in methanol. The comparison of residual weight
between batch A and B shows that the amount of dissolved drug in B
is greater than in A for both dissolution media (Table SI-3). This can be related to the batch B morphology
(Figure b,d), which
is significantly less agglomerated and well-crystalline with respect
to batch A (Figure a,c). This observation finds a possible explanation in the different
pharmaceutical grades of the two batches. Batch A has been exposed
to the environment for a longer period compared with batch B; hence,
the quality of EFV raw materials influences the dissolution of EFV
drug.
Figure 2
Dissolution profile of pristine EFV (batches A and B): (a) in distilled
water and (b) in methanol.
Figure 3
SEM image
of pristine EFV with different magnifications of ×250
and ×5.0k: batch A (a, c) and batch B (b, d). Red circles are
pointing at the dense and agglomerated particles.
Dissolution profile of pristine EFV (batches A and B): (a) in distilled
water and (b) in methanol.SEM image
of pristine EFV with different magnifications of ×250
and ×5.0k: batch A (a, c) and batch B (b, d). Red circles are
pointing at the dense and agglomerated particles.A series of preliminary experimental tests were performed by milling
EFV (batch A) for 30 min under conditions typical for ceramic materials
and metals, namely, Ω = 200 rpm and as ω/Ω + 1 =
−1 and −3.4. XRPD line profile analysis (LPA) on the
end products revealed that the process had little effect on the crystalline
domain size (Figure a). This condition appeared to be too energetic, to the point of
causing the recrystallization of the material, and the formation of
a different polymorph and partial amorphization, demonstrated by the
larger diffuse scattering signal in the XRPD pattern (Figure b).
Figure 4
XRPD patterns (Mo Kα
radiation λ = 0.7093 Å) of
pristine and milled EFV with Ω = 200 rpm and ω/Ω
+ 1 = −1 and −3.4, milling time: 30 min (a). For longer
milling time (b) (EFV-Ω = 200 rpm and ω/Ω + 1 =
−1, milling time: 6 h). Arrows correspond to the supplementary
peaks in EFV-200, −1, 6 h (different polymorph).
XRPD patterns (Mo Kα
radiation λ = 0.7093 Å) of
pristine and milled EFV with Ω = 200 rpm and ω/Ω
+ 1 = −1 and −3.4, milling time: 30 min (a). For longer
milling time (b) (EFV-Ω = 200 rpm and ω/Ω + 1 =
−1, milling time: 6 h). Arrows correspond to the supplementary
peaks in EFV-200, −1, 6 h (different polymorph).When the milling process lasts for too long, recrystallization
leads to a different morphology, with thin needles on large lumps
of the agglomerate material, clearly visible in the SEM micrographs
of Figure .
Figure 5
SEM micrographs
of EFV with an extreme grinding condition (Ω
= 200 rpm and as ω/Ω −1 and −3.4, milling
time: 6 h) with a different magnification of ×200 (a) and ×10.0
k (b).
SEM micrographs
of EFV with an extreme grinding condition (Ω
= 200 rpm and as ω/Ω −1 and −3.4, milling
time: 6 h) with a different magnification of ×200 (a) and ×10.0
k (b).A detailed XRDP study was performed
on the EFV (batch B) ground
with a mixer mill (MM400) at 25 Hz for 5 min with a waiting time of
3 min until reaching 30 min. The purpose was to investigate what phenomena
occur in highly energetic conditions; the results are illustrated
in Figure . Pristine
EFV shows crystalline form I (CSD AJEYAQ02),[27] based on the Crystallographic Structural Database system.[28]
XRPD patterns (Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54056
Å))
of (a) pristine EFV and ball-milled samples: (b) EFV-1 (as grinded),
(c) EFV-2 (after 7 days), (d) EFV-3 (after 14 days), (e) EFV-4 (after
30 days), and (f) EFV-5 (after 60 days).Rietveld refinements (Figure ) were carried out using the software TOPAS-Academic
v7.[29] For all samples, the background was
fitted using a 59-term Chebyshev function. The unit cell parameters,
isotropic displacement parameters, and an 8-term spherical harmonics
function to account for the crystallites’ preferred orientation
were refined. The fitting results are reported in Table SI-1.
Figure 7
Rietveld plot of the pristine EFV sample. The black circles
represent
the observed pattern, while the red curve indicates the calculated
one. The blue line at the bottom displays the difference between the
observed and calculated patterns. The magenta vertical bars stand
for the EFV polymorphic form I.
Rietveld plot of the pristine EFV sample. The black circles
represent
the observed pattern, while the red curve indicates the calculated
one. The blue line at the bottom displays the difference between the
observed and calculated patterns. The magenta vertical bars stand
for the EFV polymorphic form I.The pristine EFV sample is highly crystalline in comparison to
the ball-milled samples. The addition of PVP to the EFV sample promoted
the complete amorphization of the sample, which was kept even after
1 week (Figure SI-1). PVP seems to interact
with the EFV sample, thus avoiding its crystalline rearrangement.
On the other hand, in the case of the pure EFV sample subjected to
the ball milling process, the EFV polymorphic form II (CSD AJEYAQ01)[30] gradually appeared with time (Figure c–f).The EFV
sample measured after being subjected to the ball-milling
process (EFV-1) revealed form I’s maintenance but with a significant
amount of an amorphous contribution. The degree of crystallinity (DoC)[31] was calculated to be ∼53.10 wt % (Figure a). The same sample
was measured after increasing time (7 days (EFV-2), 14 days (EFV-3),
30 days (EFV-4), and 60 days (EFV-5)). A quantitative phase analysis
(QPA)[32] by the Rietveld method (Figure , more details in Figure SI-2) showed a significant evolution of
form II from 9 to 77 wt % after 30 days. Finally, after 60 days, EFV-1
was entirely transformed into form II (EFV-5), as shown in Figure c. These observations
demonstrate that polymorphism is correlated with time and occurs if
the milling process is not performed correctly. It is worth noting
that Figure d displays
only the corresponding crystalline phase mass fraction(s). The DoC
indicated the following amounts of amorphous contribution to each
sample: EFV = 1.8%, EFV-1 = 46.9%, EFV-2 = 50.3%, EFV-3 = 28.1%, EFV-4
= 76.5%, and EFV-5 = 12.0%.
Figure 8
Rietveld refinement plot of (a) EFV-1 (as ground),
(b) EFV-3 (after
14 days), (c) EFV-5 (after 60 days), and (d) comparison of EFV polymorphs
(form I and II) in wt %. The black circles represent the observed
pattern, while the red curve indicates the calculated one. The blue
line at the bottom displays the difference between the observed and
calculated patterns (residual). The magenta vertical bars stand for
the EFV polymorphic form I, while the green vertical bars indicate
the EFV polymorphic form II.
Rietveld refinement plot of (a) EFV-1 (as ground),
(b) EFV-3 (after
14 days), (c) EFV-5 (after 60 days), and (d) comparison of EFV polymorphs
(form I and II) in wt %. The black circles represent the observed
pattern, while the red curve indicates the calculated one. The blue
line at the bottom displays the difference between the observed and
calculated patterns (residual). The magenta vertical bars stand for
the EFV polymorphic form I, while the green vertical bars indicate
the EFV polymorphic form II.EFV is a delicate material where the extreme grinding condition
involves attrition and heat, resulting in amorphization, recrystallization,
polymorph transformation, agglomeration, and finally, leading to a
poor dissolution, as shown in Figure SI-3. Therefore, the model and camera recordings in operando were applied as a helpful support in the milling process comprehension
to set up conditions suitable to EFV. As a first step, energy reduction
was pursued. Ω = 60 rpm and Ω = 80 rpm were tested both
for the zirconium–zirconium, and zirconium–EFV interactions
and simulations were performed varying the ω/Ω + 1 velocity
ratio between 0 and −4.6 besides a remarkable global reduction
of the magnitude of the average stress energy with respect to Ω
= 200 rpm. Figure shows the maximum of this quantity to range between approximately
ω/Ω + 1 = −3.0 and −3.8 for both the tested
Ω.
Figure 9
Average stress energy for zirconia–zirconia and zirconia–EFV
interactions as a function of the jar to plate angular velocities,
computed from simulations performed at Ω = 60 (solid line) and
80 rpm (dashed line). For both the plate velocities and interactions,
the maximum location ranges approximately between ω/Ω
+ 1 = −3.0 and −3.8.
Average stress energy for zirconia–zirconia and zirconia–EFV
interactions as a function of the jar to plate angular velocities,
computed from simulations performed at Ω = 60 (solid line) and
80 rpm (dashed line). For both the plate velocities and interactions,
the maximum location ranges approximately between ω/Ω
+ 1 = −3.0 and −3.8.Indeed, it was shown that the maximum energy corresponds to the
largest disorder in balls motion, also providing with the more significant
amount of high normal velocity impacts, deemed as the most effective
in comminution. The maximum complexity of balls movements was confirmed
to arise around ω/Ω + 1 = −3.4 by the visual inspection
of ball trajectories both in simulations and camera recordings, as
reported in Figure, pointing out also a good agreement between images obtained from
these two techniques.
Figure 10
Top and middle, comparison of the camera and simulated
images of
milling media motion inside the jar for Ω = 60 and 80 rpm, respectively.
The maximum disorder of the motion corresponds to ω/Ω
+ 1 = −3.4.
Top and middle, comparison of the camera and simulated
images of
milling media motion inside the jar for Ω = 60 and 80 rpm, respectively.
The maximum disorder of the motion corresponds to ω/Ω
+ 1 = −3.4.High-energy grinding
positively affects the dissolution behavior
of EFV (batch A) with Ω = 60 and 80 rpm, as shown in Figure a,b. Milling with
a main disk speed of Ω = 80 rpm (EFV-A80) shows better solubility
in distilled water and methanol compared to EFV-A60 (Ω = 60
rpm). These samples dissolution profiles demonstrate that the optimized
milling conditions (reduction of Ω) lead to improved dissolution
behavior, resulting in a better biopharmaceutical performance with
respect to the preliminary test (Figure SI-3). However, the reduction of Ω is ineffective on the dissolution
behavior of batch B. The dissolution of as-milled samples (EFV-B60
and EFV-B80) is lower compared with the pristine EFV regardless of
main disk speed (Ω = 60 and Ω = 80 rpm) and dissolution
media (distilled water and methanol) (Figure c,d). This shows that the structure and
morphology of pristine EFV have an important role in the milling process’s
effect. High-energy grinding is more effective on EFV materials containing
a fraction of the amorphous phase (batch A) since it removes agglomeration
and enhances the dissolution. Basically, if the pristine EFV is well-crystalline
(batch B), the milling can cause recrystallization, forming agglomerations
and resulting in lower dissolution.
Figure 11
Dissolution profiles of pristine EFV
(batch A), EFV-A60 (Ω
= 60 rpm), and EFV-A80(Ω = 80 rpm) in (a) distilled water and
(b) methanol, and pristine EFV (batch B), EFV-B60 (Ω = 60 rpm),
and EFV-B80 (Ω = 80 rpm) in (c) distilled water and (d) methanol.
Dissolution profiles of pristine EFV
(batch A), EFV-A60 (Ω
= 60 rpm), and EFV-A80(Ω = 80 rpm) in (a) distilled water and
(b) methanol, and pristine EFV (batch B), EFV-B60 (Ω = 60 rpm),
and EFV-B80 (Ω = 80 rpm) in (c) distilled water and (d) methanol.To assess the morphology’s insight, the
residues of as-milled
EFV, deposited at the bottom of the dissolution vessel, were collected
and dried at room temperature and then observed by SEM. A correlation
between the weight of the residual (Table SI-2) and dissolution can be found: the lower the residual weight, the
higher the dissolution. The residual in distilled water (Figure c,d) demonstrated
no significant alteration in the morphology compared to the as-milled
sample (Figure a,b).
Changes in size and shape of crystals are more evident in EFV samples’
residues (EFV-A60 and EFV-A80) in methanol (Figure e,f). The rod-shaped crystal is transformed
into a needle-like crystal distributed in all parts of particles,
proving that EFV contains polymorphs with different reactions toward
the solvent.
Figure 12
SEM images of (a) as-milled EFV-A60, (b) as-milled EFV-A80,
(c)
residual of EFV-A60 in distilled water, (d) residual of EFV-A80 in
distilled water, (e) residual of EFV-A60 in methanol, and (f) residual
of EFV-A80 in methanol.
SEM images of (a) as-milled EFV-A60, (b) as-milled EFV-A80,
(c)
residual of EFV-A60 in distilled water, (d) residual of EFV-A80 in
distilled water, (e) residual of EFV-A60 in methanol, and (f) residual
of EFV-A80 in methanol.The morphology trend
in the residuals of as-milled samples in batch
B (Figure a–c
and Figure SI-4) is different compared
with A, in particular, the shape of residues and formation of the
dense particle during the milling process. In general, the inconsistency
in the morphology of different batches in different dissolution media
could arise from different polymorphs as well as the solvent–solute
interaction. Dissolution starts with the appearance of the most soluble
form and ends with the transformation to a stable form.
Figure 13
SEM images
of (a) as-milled EFV-B60, (b) residual of EFV-B60 in
distilled water, and (c) residual of EFV-B60 in methanol.
SEM images
of (a) as-milled EFV-B60, (b) residual of EFV-B60 in
distilled water, and (c) residual of EFV-B60 in methanol.FTIR was performed on the residual of EFV-A80 in methanol
and EFV-A200
(extreme milling condition) since they show needle-like morphology
(Figures and f), and the IR spectra
were compared with pristine EFV, as shown in Figure . EFV revealed the presence of the main
characteristic bands of out-of-plane =C–H vibration
at 743 cm–1, C–Cl stretching vibration at
1038 cm–1, C–F stretching band at 1000–1400
cm–1, C=C stretching vibration in the aromatic
ring at 1601 cm–1, carbonyl group (C=O) stretching
at 1745 cm–1, the vibration of alkyne at 2250 cm–1, and N–H stretching at 3300–3400 cm–1.[33] The expected bands
in the IR spectrum of EFV-159 (residual in methanol) and EFV-104 were
shifted or merged as double or triple peaks revealing the different
appearance or molecular shifting around the functional group in the
structural orientation compared to pristine EFV. This observation
indicates that milling condition’s control is essential to
avoid unpredictable EFV structure changes.
Figure 14
FTIR spectra of efavirenz
(batch A), EFV-A200 (Ω = 200 rpm
and ω/Ω + 1 = −1, milling time 6 h), and residual
of EFV-A80 in methanol (the inset is the chemical structure of EFV).
FTIR spectra of efavirenz
(batch A), EFV-A200 (Ω = 200 rpm
and ω/Ω + 1 = −1, milling time 6 h), and residual
of EFV-A80 in methanol (the inset is the chemical structure of EFV).The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) collected
by TEM
is shown in Figure . Pristine EFV (batch A) shows Debye–Scherrer rings with more
prominent spots, indicating that pristine EFV is crystalline and has
larger domains than the residual of EFV-A80, which is amorphous after
dissolution (Figure b). More attention should be devoted to EFV raw material quality
and the energy level during the milling process to ensure high milling
conditions effectiveness on the EFV drug overall properties.
Figure 15
SAED pattern
of (a) pristine EFV (batch A) and (b) residual of
EFV-A80 in methanol.
SAED pattern
of (a) pristine EFV (batch A) and (b) residual of
EFV-A80 in methanol.The dissolution behavior
in distilled water and methanol (Figure a–d) is
appreciably enhanced in the presence of PVP. Regardless of EFV batches,
we observe a reduced agglomeration of the material and a rapid dissolution
in the first few minutes. In particular, samples made with main disk
speed Ω = 80 rpm (EFV-A80-PVP and EFV-B80-PVP) show a slightly
higher dissolution rate in both dissolution media. It is noteworthy
that, in the initial points, more rapid dissolution was observed,
whereas the final values do not show such a significant increase.
PVP thus proves effective in speeding up the early stages of dissolution.
Figure 16
Dissolution
profiles of pristine EFV (batch A), EFV-A60-PVP, and
EFV-A80-PVP in (a) distilled water and (b) methanol, and pristine-EFV
(batch B), EFV-B60-PVP, and EFV-B80-PVP in (c) distilled water and
(d) methanol.
Dissolution
profiles of pristine EFV (batch A), EFV-A60-PVP, and
EFV-A80-PVP in (a) distilled water and (b) methanol, and pristine-EFV
(batch B), EFV-B60-PVP, and EFV-B80-PVP in (c) distilled water and
(d) methanol.Besides the milling parameters,
the nature of the carrier also
affects dissolution. PVP has hydrophilic and hydrophobic functional
groups, making it easier to interact with EFV and organic and inorganic
solvents, such as methanol and water. This enhances the wettability
and solubilizing effect via a steric mechanism due to the absorption
of the long-chain polymers onto the particles’ surfaces, avoiding,
therefore, their close approach to enhancing drug solubility and bioavailability.
In the absence of PVP, particle dispersions are not sufficiently stable
and may coagulate during their formation.In order to get a
clear picture, the SEM morphology of samples
containing PVP was studied. The SEM morphology of pristine PVP appears
spherical with uneven surfaces (Figure SI-5). The reduction of drug aggregation and agglomeration is evident
in PVP-containing EFV samples morphology, regardless of batches (Figure and Figure SI-6–SI-9). EFV particles with
irregular shapes formed during milling in PVP presence tend to adsorb
on the surface of PVP (Figure a,b). The irregular shapes of EFV can increase the
wettability, thus reducing the hydrophobicity of EFV.[34] The residual of EFV-PVP in methanol shows different morphological
behaviors in different batches. Figure c shows that EFV particles almost disappear
and PVP particles remain, whereas, in batch B, the EFV particles are
still present (Figure d). In fact, batch B is more crystalline than A, thus easier to dissolve.
In general, PVPpolymer interacts with EFV and forms a complex by
forming hydrogen bonds between EFV (as hydrogen bond donors) and PVP
(as hydrogen bond acceptors), forming a layer around the drug. During
the dissolution, the bound EFV can be removed from PVP at the surface
by solvent interaction, hence improving the dissolution.
Figure 17
SEM images
of (a) as-milled EFV-A80-PVP (Ω = 80 rpm), (b)
as-milled EFV-B80-PVP (Ω = 80 rpm), (c) residual of EFV-A80-PVP
in methanol, and (d) residual of EFV-B80-PVP in methanol.
SEM images
of (a) as-milled EFV-A80-PVP (Ω = 80 rpm), (b)
as-milled EFV-B80-PVP (Ω = 80 rpm), (c) residual of EFV-A80-PVP
in methanol, and (d) residual of EFV-B80-PVP in methanol.The antiviral activity of different EFV batches and corresponding
milled samples was evaluated and is presented in Figure . The pristine EFV (batch
B) shows a higher ability to inhibit HIV-1 infection than batch A.
This is due to the well-crystalline structure of batch B that helps
to increase the dissolution. However, milling conditions are more
effective on the biological activity of samples prepared based on
batch A (EFV-A69 and EFV-A80) and it has less effect on milled samples
of batch B. The quality of raw materials (agglomeration and dense
particles, amorphous phase) contributes to the milling process’s
effectiveness and antiviral activity.
Figure 18
HIV-1 NL4-3 inhibition
of different batches of EFV and the ground
samples under different conditions. IC50 values are calculated from
fitted sigmoidal dose–response curves, as described in the Methods section. Error bars represent the standard
deviations of the mean calculated from several independent experiments.
HIV-1 NL4-3 inhibition
of different batches of EFV and the ground
samples under different conditions. IC50 values are calculated from
fitted sigmoidal dose–response curves, as described in the Methods section. Error bars represent the standard
deviations of the mean calculated from several independent experiments.As shown in the antiviral activity test, milling
significantly
reduces the IC50 values of batch A. The performance of EFV-A60 becomes
comparable to pristine EFV-B. The significant improvement of the IC50
value for batch A after milling is mainly contributed by the reduced
agglomeration of particles and enhanced dissolution rate, in agreement
with the dissolution test. Hence, grinding helps improve solubility
to minimize the EFV dose to decrease the side effects and costs while
preserving the pharmaceutical compound’s effectiveness.
Experimental Section
Materials
Two
batches of EFV were
kindly donated by the Brazilian Farmanguinhos-FIOCRUZ, a government
pharmaceutical laboratory. These drugs are from the same supplier
but different production batches. With this, we intentionally want
to consider the variability of the starting material, as it is a common
practice with pharmaceutical products, especially when drugs from
a known brand are confronted with a generic one with no label. Methanol
(99.8%) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (molecular weight = 10,000) were
purchased from Sigma Aldrich. For the purpose of analysis, distilled
water was obtained by a purification system Milli-Q (Aquatron A4S).
Methods
Sample Preparation
EFV was subjected
to high-energy grinding in a planetary ball mill (Fritsch Pulverisette
P4) using zirconium oxide balls and a jar. This material was chosen
since it offers at the same time the high grinding efficiency (due
to the high density) and great wear resistance, satisfying the requirement
of preventing sample contamination, fundamental for the milling of
a pharmaceutical. Grinding experiments were performed in a 45 mL jar
filled with 20 balls of 3 mm diameter and 800 mg of EFV powder, either
with (50 w/w%) and without PVP. The complete set of geometrical and
physical properties of the milling media is reported in Table SI-3. Different plate velocities (Ω:
200, 80, and 60) and jar-to-plate velocity ratios (ω/Ω
+ 1) were tested by both computer simulations and experiments. In
addition, a part of sample preparation was performed at the Federal
University of ABC in Brazil, particularly to study the XRPD properties
of EFV and ground samples. The samples were ground via a mixer mill
MM400 (Retsch, Haan, Germany). Two stainless-steel 10 mL jars and
two 10 mm balls were employed. The samples were ball milled at 25
Hz for 5 min with a waiting time of 3 min until reaching 30 min. The
same condition was applied to a sample using 1:1 wt % EFV and PVP.
The Multibody Dynamics Model
A
multibody dynamics model[35−37] was used for investigating the
effect of the jar-(ω) to-plate (Ω) velocity ratio defined
as ω/Ω + 1. Counter-rotating jar and plate are adopted,
and, therefore, jar velocity is taken with a negative sign. The case
of jar and plate rotating in the same direction was not considered
in this study since it has been demonstrated to be less effective
in terms of energy transfer and comminution. All the values of parameters
adopted for the zirconia–zirconia and zirconia–EFV interactions
resulting from the experiments can be found in Table SI-4. Simulations lasting for 24 s were performed for
both cases, and the results in terms of relative velocity were exploited
to compute the average stress energy.[38] Trajectories of balls were also investigated and compared with camera
recordings.
Camera Recordings
The balls motion[38] was monitored in operando by
means of a high-speed camera (Sony Action Cam HDR-AS200V, 240 fps,
1280 × 720 pixel resolution) both with and without the EFV mill
charge, by installing the equipment. Since the camera was directly
installed on the jar through an expressly designed slot, the recorded
balls’ trajectories refer to the vial reference frame. The
visibility of milling media was allowed by a transparent polycarbonate
lid and 50 LEDs mounted on a ring (i.e., an automotive angel eye).
The first group of recordings was taken without the mill feed, and
then calcium fluoride was added for a new batch of observations. This
way, the effect of the mill charge was clearly highlighted. Camera
recordings allowed a qualitative comprehension of balls’ movements
and their dependence on milling parameters setup.
Characterization
X-ray powder diffraction
(XRPD) patterns of pristine EFV (batch A and B) were obtained using
a Panalytical X’Pert MRD instrument (Philips) equipped with
a Co Kα radiation (λ = 1.7889 Å) sealed tube operated
at 40 kV and 40 mA; the XRPD patterns of ball-milled EFV were recorded
using a Thermo-ARL XT́RA diffractometer with Mo Kα radiation
(λ = 0.7093 Å) generated at 50 kV and 40 mA, with a scanning
rate of 0.4°/min over the 1.5–12° 2θ range.
Measurements were performed in Bragg–Brentano geometry. The
analysis of each powder pattern under the whole powder pattern modeling
(WPPM) approach,[39−41] provided with the corresponding full width at half
maximum (FWHM), which in the present context can be taken as inversely
proportional to the size of the crystalline domains.[42] In addition, some of XRPD data were collected in transmission
geometry using a STADI-P (Stoe, Darmstadt, Germany) diffractometer
equipped with a Ge(111) primary beam monochromator, providing pure
Cu Kα1 radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å), and
operating at 40 kV and 40 mA. The samples were loaded between two
cellulose acetate foils, and the sample holder was kept spinning during
data collection. The X-ray photons were detected using a linear detector,
Mythen 1 K (Dectris, Baden, Switzerland). The measurements were carried
out in the 2θ region from 4° to 55.935° in steps of
0.015° and a counting time of 100 s at each 1.05°. To calculate
the samples’ degree of crystallinity in TOPAS-Academic V7,
two peaks (Peaks_Phase; the peaks were positioned at 2θ values
of 12.1° and 20.6°) were inserted to perform single line
fittings, from sample EFV to EFV-5. Their corresponding peak positions
and areas were then maintained fixed to obtain the samples’
amorphous contribution. The “degree of crystallinity-DoC”
was obtained taking into account the calculated “total area”
that contributed to the overall diffraction pattern, i.e., the full
areas under the amorphous contribution (inferred as the broadening
due to the two peaks inserted in the diffraction patterns) and the
ones due to the crystalline phases of both form I and/or form II.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging and selected area electron
diffraction (SAED) were performed with a high-resolution scanning/transmission
electron microscopy instrument (Thermo Fisher TALOS 200 s). The measurements
have been carried out at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The dissolution
test was performed on powder samples using an Erweka DT-626 dissolution
tester. (six vessels) with a paddle apparatus. The dissolution procedure
consisted of placing 100 mg of the drug (powder) into the dissolution
vessel. Dissolution conditions were 900 mL of methanol solution (40%
V/V) kept at constant human body temperature (37.0 ± 0.5 °C)
with a rotation speed of 50 rpm. The drug release in the dissolution
media was real-time measured using a UV–vis spectrophotometer
(Perkin Elmer Lambda 750) coupled with the dissolutor. Samples were
collected after 10 s required for the drug to disintegrate and release
continuously using a 40 μm cannula filter; the analysis was
performed at 248 nm wavelength. The same procedure was performed for
the distilled water. A scanning electron microscope was utilized to
visualize the samples’ grain shape and surface morphology using
a Coxem EM-30AX instrument. For SEM observations, all samples were
coated with a Au–Pd (25 mA) metallization layer. Fourier transform
infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was performed using a Perkin Elmer spectrometer
by averaging 16 scans with a resolution of 2 cm–1 in the wavenumber range between 650 and 4000 cm–1.[43] The samples’ biological activity
was assessed using single-round HIV-1 Env-defective HIV-1 (NL4-3)
complemented with Env derived from HIV-1 HXB2 expressed with the vector
PBJ5. Viral particles were harvested 48 h post-transfection, clarified
by low-speed centrifugation at 300 g for 5 min, and filtered through
a 0.45 μm pore filter.[44] At 30 mM,
stock solutions were prepared in 50/50% ethanol/milli-Q water for
all 10 samples of efavirenz. Stock solutions were further diluted
to obtain a final concentration of 30 nM in complete DMEM, supplemented
with 1% glutamine (Gibco), and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum
(FBS) (Gibco) containing HIV NL4-3. Preliminary tests were performed
to determine the optimal concentration range of efavirenz to determine
the IC50 value. TZM-bl stably transfected with a construct containing
ZsGreen fluorescent protein expressed under the control of HIV LTR[45] were seeded 1 day prior to infection at a density
of 20 k cells/well in a 96-well plate (Corning) in complete DMEM.
Right before efavirenz administration, the culture medium was replaced
with complete DMEM containing HIV-1 NL4-3. Efavirenz dilutions were
added to the plate, and serial dilutions 1:3 were performed in triplicate.
Seven concentrations were tested to determine IC50 values for each
sample. The number of positive (infected) cells was measured using
an EnSight multimode plate reader (Perkin Elmer) (excitation 465 nm),
normalized on control (untreated cells exposed to NL4-3), and expressed
as a percentage; these data were fitted with a sigmoidal a curve using
the least square variable slope method and the dose-normalized response
with GraphPad to determine the IC50 value for each sample.
Conclusions
This study proved that ball milling is
a convenient tool to improve
the dissolution rate of EFV. The extreme grinding condition (Ω
= 200 rpm) with a long milling time (6 h) results in recrystallization
and agglomeration of EFV, associated with a decrease in solubility.
In addition, the decrease in crystalline domain size does not imply
an improvement of the dissolution behavior, which not only depends
on the size and shape of the crystals but also on the agglomeration
grade of efavirenz raw materials.Therefore, an optimization
of grinding variables was performed
via a multibody dynamics model. The experimental results proved that
milling conditions’ effectiveness is significantly dependent
on the quality of pristine EFV materials. The starting material with
a well-crystalline structure (batch B) shows a higher dissolution
rate both in distilled water and in methanol (40%) with respect to
as-milled samples and batch A. The reduction of energy (Ω) to
80 rpm and time to 30 min (non-stop) was found to effectively enhance
the dissolution of batch A, with favorable results obtained in methanol.
This milling condition reduces the agglomerated and dense particles
of EFV while essentially keeping intact its crystalline nature.It was found that the combination of PVP with EFV markedly enhances
the dissolution rate of efavirenz. In fact, the improvements of dissolution
using PVP could be explained by forming a hydrophilic layer on the
surface of EFV, resulting in the drug’s wettability and stabilization.
The stabilization of such complexes is due to a cooperative interaction
through hydrogen bonds forming between EFV (as hydrogen bond donors)
and PVP (as hydrogen bond acceptors) groups on the polymer chain.
In addition, the morphology of the samples following the grinding
was studied. A detailed study of the morphology of the EFV residual
in different media (distilled water and methanol) indicates the presence
of different polymorphs in EFV. A gradual transformation of the EFV
polymorph (from form I to II) was monitored by XRPD and correlated
with the dissolution phenomena and morphological behavior. The antiviral
activity is affected by the pristine EFV quality, specifically its
microstructural properties or agglomeration grade. Batch B shows a
higher ability to inhibit HIV-1 infection than batch A, requiring
a decreased dosage to achieve therapeutic levels in the body. In general,
high-energy grinding is more effective on EFV materials containing
a small degree of amorphous phase; hence more attention should be
devoted to the quality of the pristine EFV material and to the energy
level during the milling process to ensure the effectiveness of milling
on the overall properties of the EFV drug.
Authors: Ian J Bruno; Jason C Cole; Paul R Edgington; Magnus Kessler; Clare F Macrae; Patrick McCabe; Jonathan Pearson; Robin Taylor Journal: Acta Crystallogr B Date: 2002-05-29
Authors: Rodrigo Cristofoletti; Anita Nair; Bertil Abrahamsson; D W Groot; Sabine Kopp; Peter Langguth; James E Polli; Vinod P Shah; Jennifer B Dressman Journal: J Pharm Sci Date: 2012-11-22 Impact factor: 3.534